UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )
Filed by the Registrant   ☐
Filed by the Registrant  x
Filed by a party other than the Registrant  o
Check the appropriate box:
oPreliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material under §240.14a-12
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xNo fee required.
oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   ☐

Check the appropriate box:



Preliminary Proxy Statement

gpmtlogohr.jpg

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A
New York, New York 10036(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and 0-11.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: cv_ofc-pn.jpg]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_granitepoint-pn.jpg]
Dear Fellow Stockholders:Stockholders,
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., we would likeit is my pleasure to invite you to our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be conducted virtually via live webcast, on Tuesday,Thursday, June 2, 2020,1, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. We believe that hosting a virtual annual meeting will make our annual meeting more accessible for all our stockholders.
The accompanying Notice of our stockholders, particularly in lightAnnual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the COVID-19 pandemic.
business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and details regarding access to the webcast. It is important that your shares of common stock be represented at our Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares you hold and whether or not you plan to attend the virtual meeting. Accordingly, we encourage you to authorize your vote as soon as possible by following the instructions contained in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that you receive for our Annual Meeting.
The accompanying NoticeMeeting, or, if you have elected to receive a paper or email copy of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and details regarding access to the Annual Meeting webcast. Consistent with last year, we will be using the “Notice and Access” method of furnishing proxy materials, to you over the Internet. This process provides you with a convenientby completing, signing and quick way to access our proxy materials and vote your shares, while allowing us to reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting and the costs of printing and distributingreturning the proxy materials. On or about April 23, 2020, we will commence mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains information regarding how to access our proxy materials and vote.card that is provided.
We hope you are able to attend our virtual 20202023 Annual Meeting. We appreciate your continued support and the confidence demonstrated by your investment in Granite Point.
Sincerely,
jtsignaturehr.jpg
John A. Taylor
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

April 23, 2020





gpmtlogohra01.jpg

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A
New York, New York 10036

NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jacktaylor-bw.jpg]
Sincerely,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_johnataylor-bw.jpg]
John A. Taylor
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
April 17, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_gpicon-pn.jpg]
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
MEETING LOGISTICS
Date:Tuesday,
When:
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_when-pn.jpg]
Thursday, June 2, 2020
Time:1, 2023 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
Website:www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2020
Where:
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_where-pn.jpg]
You can attend the meeting by logging into virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2023 and following the instructions provided on your Notice of Availability.
Agenda:Who:
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_people-pn.jpg]
(1)    To elect as directors the six nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement, each to serve until
our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified;
(2)To hold an advisory vote relating to the compensation of our executive officers;
(3)To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and
(4)To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Record Date:
You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a holder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on April 3, 2020.2023.
Voting:
You are encouraged to vote in one of the following ways prior to the meeting.
Stockholders of Record
Proxy Materials:
On or about April 23, 2020, we expect to begin mailing aBy Internet
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_internet-pn.jpg]
Please access the website www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided on the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card.
By Telephone
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_phone-pn.jpg]
Please call the number and follow the instructions provided on the Notice of Proxy Materials,Availability or proxy card.
By Mail
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_mail-pn.jpg]
Please complete, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the reply envelope included with the paper proxy materials.
Beneficial Owners
If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, which contains information regarding howis similar to access our proxy materials and vote. Our Proxy Statement and 2019 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.the voting procedures for stockholders of record.
Admission:
To participate in the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2020. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
Questions:
You may submit a question prior to the Annual Meeting online at www.proxyvote.com or during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2020.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
rssignature.jpg
Rebecca B. Sandberg
Vice President and Secretary
April 23, 2020
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 2020:
Our Proxy Statement and 2019 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, are available at www.proxyvote.com






TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOTING ITEMS
ProposalsBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
To elect as directors the purpose ofsix nominees named in the Annual Meeting?accompanying proxy statement
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.jpg]
To approve on atan advisory basis the Annual Meeting that are not included in this proxy statement?compensation of our named executive officers
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.jpg]
To ratify the Company holding a virtual annual meeting?appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023
FOR
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.jpg]
We will also transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
On or about April 17, 2023, we will begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains information regarding how to access our proxy materials and vote, to stockholders unless they have directed us to provide the materials in a different manner. Certain stockholders will continue to receive a printed set of proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy card or voting instructions. Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.
To attend the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2023. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_michaeljkarbernew-gray.jpg]
Michael J. Karber
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
April 17, 2023

Table of Contents
PROXY SUMMARY2
2
4
4
11
1020
20
Director Independence
1020
Board Leadership Structure
1021




Committee Member Qualifications21
PageCommittee Responsibilities21
Board Committeesand Committee Meetings
1123
24
1325
26
Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections26
Communications with Our Board27
Director Orientation and Continued Education28
Director Compensation28
1631
31
Transactions with Related Persons31
SECURITY OWNERSHIP AND REPORTING32
1832
1933
2034
2237
Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisOverview
2238
Overview ofHow Executive Compensation Program and PhilosophyIs Determined
2240
Role ofExecutive Compensation CommitteeComponents
2343
Role ofExecutive Compensation ConsultantPolicies and Practices51







2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 1




[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]

Proxy Summary
gpmtlogocolora05.jpg

This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before voting. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully.
About Our Company
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (NYSE: GPMT) is an internally managed real-estate finance company that focuses primarily on directly originating, investing in and managing senior floating-rate commercial mortgage loans and other debt and debt-like commercial real estate (CRE) investments. We operate as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code.
3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400AWe are a long-term, fundamental value-oriented investor. We construct our investment portfolio on a loan-by-loan basis, emphasizing rigorous credit underwriting, selectivity and diversification, and we assess each investment from a fundamental value perspective relative to other opportunities available in the market.
New York, New York 10036GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. TIMELINE

[MISSING IMAGE: fc_crepla-pn.jpg]
PROXY STATEMENT FORINTERNALIZATION
As noted in the timeline above, we were externally managed by Pine River Capital Management L.P., or our Former Manager, through 2020. We entered into a definitive agreement with our Former Manager on October 10, 2020, ANNUAL MEETINGpursuant to which we internalized our management function on December 31, 2020. Our internal management structure and the accompanying enhancements in disclosure and transparency provide us with a differentiated platform that is more closely aligned with our stockholders’ interests.
Benefits of Internal Management Structure for Our Stockholders
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]

Meaningfully reduced operating expenses and created opportunities to realize increased economies of scale

No management fee based on stockholders’ equity

Executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based cash and equity awards that incorporate financial and non-financial goals

Compensation Committee approval  –  and transparent disclosure  –  of all components of executive compensation, not just equity awards

Alignment of capital markets activities with stockholder interests
2 / gpmtreit.com/investors


[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
This proxy statement
OUR INVESTMENT STRATEGY
Our investment objective is being furnishedto generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders over the long-term, primarily through dividends, and to preserve our stockholders’ capital through business cycles. We believe that the stability of our capital base is important to our ability to invest in assets that generate attractive returns on an ongoing basis. We seek to achieve our investment objective by relying on the experience of our team, leveraging our longstanding industry relationships and identifying, sourcing, structuring and managing investments with attractive risk-return profiles.
We directly originate, invest in and manage a portfolio of primarily senior floating-rate commercial real estate loans and other debt and debt-like instruments secured by various types of institutional quality commercial properties located in attractive markets across the United States and managed by experienced owners. These loans may vary in term and may bear interest at a fixed or floating rate, although our primary focus is on behalffloating-rate loans. We typically provide intermediate-term bridge or transitional financing for a variety of purposes, including acquisitions, recapitalizations, refinancings and a range of business plans, including lease-up, renovation, repositioning and repurposing of the board of directors, commercial property.
As a long-term, fundamental value-oriented investor, we may adjust our investment strategy as we react to evolving market dynamics. We believe there are enduring opportunities within our target investments that present attractive, risk-adjusted returns. However, as economic and business cycles develop, we may expand and/or the Board, of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation, or the Company,adjust our investment strategy and target investments to capitalize on various investment opportunities. At time, we may prioritize maintaining higher liquidity and lower leverage to provide us orwith more flexibility to actively manage our in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, or the Annual Meeting.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 2020.
This proxy statementportfolio and our 2019 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, are available at www.proxyvote.com.
Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Notice of Availability, to the holders of our common stock as of the close of business on April 3, 2020. All common stockholders will be able to access our proxy materialsbalance sheet, depending on the website referredmarket conditions. We believe that our well-diversified portfolio and flexible investment strategy will allow us to actively adapt to changing market conditions and generate attractive, long-term risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders in the Noticea variety of Availability (www.proxyvote.com) or request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. Instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet or request a printed copy of our proxy materials may be found in the Notice of Availability.
We anticipate that the Notice of Availability will be mailed to common stockholders beginning on or about April 23, 2020.
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to vote on the following matters:environments.
Portfolio and Capitalization Snapshot
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_finance4-pn.jpg]
(1)

Broadly diversified 100% loan portfolio comprised of 90 discrete investments totaling $3.6 billion in commitments and $3.4 billion outstanding balance

99% senior loans with an average commitment of $37 million and a weighted average stabilized LTV(1) of 62.9% and yield(1) of 8.4%

Capitalized with approximately $1 billion of equity and a well-balanced funding profile with 60% non-mark-to-market borrowings and moderate leverage of 2.3x debt-to-equity(1)
(1)
See definition in the Appendix
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 3

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
Meeting Information
DATE & TIME:
Thursday, June 1, 2023
10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
VIRTUAL MEETING:
This year’s meeting will be held virtually at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2023
RECORD DATE:
Holders of record of common stock at the close of business on April 3, 2023, are eligible to vote
MEETING AGENDA:
1.
To elect as directors the six nominees named in this proxy statement each to serve until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified;
(2)
2.
To holdapprove on an advisory vote relating tobasis the compensation of our named executive officers;
(3)officers
3.
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firmauditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and
(4)2023
4.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting orand any adjournment or postponement thereof.thereof
Voting Roadmap
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_propos1-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. These individuals bring a range of relevant experiences and perspectives that is essential to good governance and leadership of our Company.
“FOR”
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 11)
4 / gpmtreit.com/investors

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
NOMINEE SNAPSHOT
NomineeAgeDirector
Since
IndependentPrimary OccupationCommittees
AuditCompN&CG
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_kasnet-pn.jpg]
Stephen G. Kasnet
Chair of the Board
772017
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Harbor Global Company, Ltd.C
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jacktaylor-pn.jpg]
John (“Jack”) A.
Taylor
672017CEOPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_dehne-pn.jpg]
Tanuja M. Dehne512017
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Geraldine R. Dodge FoundationMC
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_mcgrath-pn.jpg]
Sheila K. McGrath582023
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Principal, Grayton Advisory LLCM
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sanders-pn.jpg]
W. Reid Sanders732017
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
President of Sanders Properties, Inc.MMM
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_woodhousebw-pn.jpg]
Hope B. Woodhouse662017
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Former Chief Operating Officer of Bridgewater Associates, LPMCM
Number of Meetings in 2022Full Board: 117105
Comp = Compensation   N&CG = Nominating & Corporate Governance   C = Chair   M = Member
NOMINEE CHARACTERISTICS
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_board-pn.jpg]
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 5

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Independent Chair
Independent
committees
Majority voting
Our Chief Executive Officer focuses on managing our Company while our independent Board Chair drives accountability at the Board level
All our Board committees are composed entirely of independent directorsWe have a majority standard for uncontested elections of directors and a resignation policy for directors who do not receive a majority of the votes cast
Annually elected
Board
Board assessments
Executive sessions
We do not have a classified board – each of our directors is elected annually for a one-year term
A rigorous self-assessment process helps our Board evaluate its performance and identify and address any potential gapsOur independent directors hold regular executive sessions, with the independent Board Chair presiding
Director education
Limits on outside
board service
Stock ownership
guidelines
Our Director Education Policy empowers our directors to be well versed in principles of corporate governance and other critical subject matters
A director may not serve on more than three other boards of public companies in addition to our Board, and a director who serves as a public company CEO may not serve on more than one other boardEach independent director is expected to accumulate equity interests in an amount equal to three times the director’s annual cash retainer
Commitment to Board
diversity
ESG oversight
Investor outreach
We take reasonable steps to assemble a diverse pool of nominees when conducting searches for new directors, and any search firm we engage is instructed to seek to include diverse candidates
With the leadership of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board oversees our Company’s approach to environmental, social and governance mattersWe have initiated a dialogue with many of our investors focused on corporate governance and ESG topics
No hedging or
pledging
Single class of
common stock
No political
contributions
We prohibit short sales, transactions in derivatives, hedging and pledging of our securities by directors, executive officers and employees
Each share of our common stock has one voteIn accordance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Company does not contribute to political candidates, parties or campaigns
6 / gpmtreit.com/investors

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PROGRAM
Program Foundations
At Granite Point, we are committed to identifying and responding to business risks and opportunities related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. We are also committed to being a responsible, ethical corporate citizen, an employer of choice for talented professionals, and a positive member of the communities where we live and work.
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_core-pn.jpg]
Board Oversight of ESG Matters
As reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board oversees our approach to ESG matters and reviews periodic reports from management on related topics. Our Board has assigned duties and responsibilities to its independent committees through their charters to help our Board fulfill its oversight function.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides leadership by assisting the Board in overseeing our overarching ESG approach, and each of the three committees has oversight responsibility for several specific ESG matters consistent with that committee’s overall purpose, as outlined below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Reviewing, and assisting our Board in overseeing, our ESG priorities, strategies and related public disclosures

Recommending to our Board changes to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Reviewing and advising the Board with respect to Board composition, structure and membership

Compensation Committee

Reviewing our human capital management strategies and practices, which may include those
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 7

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
related to recruiting, retention, non-executive compensation, employee engagement, professional development, and diversity, equity and inclusion

Determining compensation of executive officers

Evaluating risks arising from our compensation plans and programs

Audit Committee

Overseeing risks to which our Company is exposed – including those arising from data security issues, climate change and other environmental matters – as well as our assessment and management of such risks

Overseeing our compliance and ethics programs
Management’s Cross-Functional Approach to ESG
We have assembled an ESG working group that reports to our Chief Executive Officer and consists of members from our loan originations, human resources, legal, financial reporting and investor relations functions. This working group meets monthly and has been charged with providing leadership in the following areas:

Identifying the most significant risks and opportunities that ESG matters represent for our business and the most significant impacts that ESG matters have on our business partners, investors, employees, communities and other stakeholders. The group does this work through reflection on the members’ subject matter expertise, consideration of stakeholder priorities communicated to members, and reference to external reporting standards and peer disclosures.

Developing strategies and responsive measures to address ESG risks and opportunities while generating positive impacts

Communicating Granite Point’s ESG priorities, strategies and measures to other team members in all-hands and smaller group meetings, in training sessions, and through the development of policies and other materials distributed to all personnel

Preparing disclosures to provide our external stakeholders information about the ESG matters we have identified as being most significant to our Company, as well as the strategies and responsive measures we have developed
Overview of the Most Significant ESG Matters for Our Company
Guided by our core values and the oversight of our Board, we have identified the following topics as being the most significant ESG matters for our business and stakeholders. You can find more information about these topics on our website at www.gpmtreit.com/esg. Note that information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Environmental
Social
Governance
Climate change and other environmental factors pose risks to our investment portfolio that we must actively manage, and we also recognize our responsibility to operate our business in a manner that limits negative environmental impactsOur social commitment is centered on human capital management – that is, providing resources and support to attract, develop and retain our team of talented professionals – as well as positively engaging with the communities where we operate in New York and MinnesotaA strong governance framework – including an effective ethics and compliance program, thoughtful attention to information security and privacy concerns, and quality corporate governance practices at the Board level – is critical to our long-term success as a real-estate finance company
8 / gpmtreit.com/investors

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_propos2-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this “Say on Pay” advisory proposal. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward performance and align with stockholders’ interests.
“FOR”
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 70)
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
OUR TOTAL REWARDS PHILOSOPHY IS DESIGNED TO:

Attract, retain and incentivize the best talent to support our business objectives;

Pay for performance by linking compensation to the achievement of short-term and long-term financial and strategic goals;

Align the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by tying elements of executive compensation to corporate performance and generated returns; and

Ensure fair, equitable and competitive pay practices.
2022 TARGET TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_ceo-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_neo-pn.jpg]
*
Numbers do not add up to 100% due to rounding
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 9

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
QUALITY COMPENSATION PRACTICES
What We Do
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]

A significant majority of each executive officer’s compensation is at risk

Our forfeiture and clawback policy allows recoupment of cash or equity awards upon a financial restatement

We have adopted meaningful stock ownership requirements applicable to our NEOs

Our Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant who provides no other services to our Company

Performance-based cash and equity awards have a sliding scale earn-out structure that allows for 0% payouts and is capped at 200% of target amounts

We conduct an annual compensation risk assessment
What We Don’t Do
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_dont-bw.jpg]

Our executive officers do not receive perquisites or retirement plans not available to other employees

We do not allow our NEOs to hedge or pledge their Company stock

We do not have single-trigger accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change of control of the Company

We do not pay dividends on any performance-based equity units that are not earned through satisfaction of the awards’ performance metrics

Our executive officers do not have guaranteed bonuses

We do not provide tax gross-ups

Our NEOs’ employment agreements do not provide for excessive severance payments
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_propos3-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.
“FOR”
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.gif]
(See Page 71)
10 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Bylaws, or Bylaws, each of our directors is elected by stockholders each year at our annual meeting to serve terms expiring at the next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Our Bylaws provide that our Board may be comprised of no fewer than the number of directors required by the Maryland General Corporation Law and no more than 15, with the precise number to be set by our Board.
Our Board currently has six members, and all of them have been nominated by the Board for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 1, 2023, or the Annual Meeting. Sheila K. McGrath was elected to the Board by the directors in January 2023, and the other five directors were elected by the stockholders at the 2022 annual meeting. Ms. McGrath was recommended as a director nominee by a third-party search firm. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.
Key Skills and Qualifications
We have highly qualified director nominees who reflect a broad and diverse mix of business backgrounds, skills and experience. We believe that each of our director nominees possesses high standards of ethics, integrity and professionalism, sound judgment and a commitment to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders.
It is particularly important that the following skills and qualifications are represented on our Board so that it can oversee our Company effectively:
Key Skill or QualificationImportance to Granite Point
Real Estate or REITDirectors with extensive knowledge of, and/or experience in, the real estate sector and/or REITs have the knowledge needed to set and oversee our strategy
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet ManagementDirectors with experience overseeing corporate strategy (including M&A and capital markets transactions) and/or balance sheet management (including funding and capital allocation strategies) help evaluate value-creating opportunities for our Company and our stockholders
Finance or AccountingDirectors with strong financial literacy and experience reviewing financial reporting and internal controls enhance our Board’s ability to oversee our strategy and drive accurate and transparent reporting to our stockholders
Credit or Principal InvestingDirectors with experience in credit investing and/or principal investing provide valuable perspectives that inform our strategy and long-term, fundamental, value-driven investment philosophy
Operations and ManagementDirectors with operations and management experience help guide our Company through various economic, credit and interest rate cycles and enhance our Board’s ability to develop and oversee our internal operations and business strategy
Investor Communications and OutreachDirectors with experience understanding the investor perspective and/or maintaining deep institutional relationships enhance our investor communications and outreach practices as a publicly traded company
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 11

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Key Skill or QualificationImportance to Granite Point
ESGDirectors with experience evaluating and overseeing ESG efforts, including but not limited to environmental sustainability and diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, allow our Company to build and maintain a long-term, responsible business model, and deepen relationships with our investors, business partners, other stakeholders and communities
Prior Public Board or Governance ExperienceDirectors with experience serving on public company boards help promote a culture of accountability and transparency on our Board in addition to instituting corporate governance policies that protect stockholder interests
Nominee Skills and Qualifications Matrix
The following matrix portrays the foregoing key skills and qualifications and the self-identified demographic characteristics of the six director nominees standing for election to our Board at the Annual Meeting. Our directors have had varied experiences, and for each of them the matrix below indicates the skills and qualifications that are most salient to their service on our Board.
KasnetTaylorDehneMcGrathSandersWoodhouse
Real Estate or REIT
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet
Management
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Finance or Accounting
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Credit or Principal Investing
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Operations and Management
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Investor Communications and Outreach
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
ESG
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Demographic Characteristics
Women
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Ethnic/Racial Minorities
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.jpg]
Please read the biographical information that follows for more detailed information regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director nominee that led our Board to conclude that he or she should be nominated to serve on our Board.
12 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_kasnet-pn.jpg]
Chair of the Board and Independent Director
Committee(s):
Audit (Chair)
STEPHEN G. KASNET
Age: 77
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – Through various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Silver Bay Realty Trust, Bradley Real Estate Trust and Harbor Global, Mr. Kasnet has extensive REIT and real estate sector experience
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – In various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp. and Silver Bay Realty Trust, Mr. Kasnet has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and in balance sheet management
Finance or Accounting – As a qualified financial expert on the Audit Committee, Mr. Kasnet has the experience and financial literacy to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Credit or Principal Investing – As a director of Two Harbors, former CEO of Pioneer First Voucher Fund and former President of Pioneer Real Estate Investors, among other positions, Mr. Kasnet has experience investing in real estate and other real estate products
Operations and Management – Through various executive roles in the real estate and mortgage REIT industry, Mr. Kasnet has the right expertise to help develop and oversee our business strategy and has a broad perspective on operational matters
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – Mr. Kasnet has served as a director for multiple public companies, including Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO), Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY), Columbia Laboratories (NASDAQ: CBRX) and Rubicon (NZX: RBC)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President and CEO, Harbor Global and CEO, PIOglobal Investment Fund (a subsidiary of Harbor Global) (2000-2006)

CEO, Pioneer First Voucher Fund (Russia) (2000-2006)

President, Pioneer Global Institutional Advisors (1995-2000)

President, Pioneer Real Estate Investors (1993-2000)

Director and Member of the Executive Committee, The Bradley Real Estate Trust (1995-1999)

President, Cabot, Cabot and Forbes Asset Management (1990-1993)

Additional senior management positions with other financial organizations, including First Winthrop Corporation and Winthrop Financial Associates
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Member of the Risk Oversight Committee, Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO) (2009-present)

Director, Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. (NYSE: SBY) (2012-2017)

Chairman of the Board, Rubicon (NZX: RBC) (2008-2018)

Director, First Ipswich Bancorp (2008-2020)

Director, GoodBulk, an ocean cargo carrier (2017-2019)

Chairman of the Board, Tenon Ltd., a timberland owner and wood product producer (2016-2018)

Chairman of the Board, Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRX) (2004-2015)

Director, Republic Engineered Products, a specialty steel manufacturer (2002-2008)

Director, FTD, a florist collective (2001-2005)

Chairman of the Board, Warren Bank & Warren Bancorp. (1990-2003)
ORGANIZATIONS

Trustee, The Governor’s Academy, a private coed boarding high school in Byfield, Massachusetts
EDUCATION

BA, University of Pennsylvania
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 13

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jacktaylor-pn.jpg]
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
JOHN (“JACK”) A. TAYLOR
Age: 67
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – Through various management and real estate group leadership positions at asset management firms, including PGIM Real Estate Investors, UBS and PaineWebber, and membership in the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council and President’s Council of the Real Estate Roundtable, Mr. Taylor has extensive real estate sector experience
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – As a leader in the real estate groups at Prudential Real Estate Investors, UBS, PaineWebber and Kidder, Peabody & Co., Mr. Taylor has extensive experience managing corporate strategy in the real estate sector – including by effecting transactions and raising capital – and the right experience to manage our balance sheet and funding profile
Finance or Accounting – Through various management positions at real estate finance companies, Mr. Taylor brings strong financial literacy and a deep expertise in real estate finance fundamentals
Credit or Principal Investing – As partner of Five Mile Capital and Head of Global Real Estate Finance at Prudential Real Estate Investors, Mr. Taylor has developed deep knowledge of debt products and asset-based lending in the real estate space
Operations and Management – As President and CEO of Granite Point and through various management positions at asset management firms, Mr. Taylor has extensive knowledge of our Company and the right experience to oversee our Company’s operations and business strategy
Investor Communications and Outreach – As President and CEO of Granite Point and through various management positions at asset management firms, Mr. Taylor has extensive experience with investor communications practices
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President and CEO, Granite Point Mortgage Trust (2017-present)

Global Head of Commercial Real Estate, Pine River Capital Management (2014-2020)

Managing Director, Head of Global Real Estate Finance, Member of the Global Management Committee and Chair of the Global Investment Committee for debt and equity, Prudential Real Estate Investors (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company) (2009-2014)

Partner, Five Mile Capital Partners (2003-2007)

Co-Head of Real Estate Investment Banking for the Americas and Europe, UBS

Head of Real Estate Group and Member of the Operating Committee, PaineWebber

Head Trader and Manager of CMBS and Principal Commercial Mortgage business, Kidder, Peabody & Co.
ORGANIZATIONS

Founding Governor and Member, Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (formerly known as the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association)

Member, President’s Council of the Real Estate Roundtable

Chairman of the Board, Innocence Project, an organization that works to free the innocent, prevent wrongful convictions and create fair, compassionate and equitable systems of justice for everyone, guided by science and grounded in antiracism
EDUCATION

JD, Yale Law School

MSc, International Relations, London School of Economics and Political Science

BA, University of Illinois
14 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_dehne-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair), Compensation
TANUJA M. DEHNE
Age: 51
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – As a director at Silver Bay Realty Trust, Ms. Dehne developed knowledge of REITs and the real estate sector
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – In various director and management positions, including at Silver Bay Realty Trust, Advanced Disposal Services and NRG Energy, as well as in private legal practice, Ms. Dehne has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital market and other strategic opportunities
Finance or Accounting – Through her experience as a corporate and securities attorney, service on the Audit Committee of Silver Bay Realty Trust and her experience overseeing the investment management of an endowment, Ms. Dehne has the financial literacy to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Operations and Management – Through various roles and spans of control at NRG Energy and as the President and CEO at the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Ms. Dehne has operational and management experience that enhances our Board’s ability to develop and oversee our operations and business strategy; through various roles at NRG Energy, including Chief Administrator and Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Ms. Dehne has operational experience in managing human capital
ESG – As an executive and director at the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation and Climate Real Impact Solutions II Acquisition Corp., respectively, Ms. Dehne provides experience elevating and providing perspective regarding environmental, sustainability and social justice issues and best practices
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – With over two decades teaching, advising and serving on corporate boards, and as Co-Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Gupta Governance Institute at Drexel University, Ms. Dehne provides corporate governance expertise to our Board
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President and CEO, Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, a private foundation that supports, centers, and connects communities and changemakers who are addressing the root causes and repair of structural racism and inequity in New Jersey (2019-present)

NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG) (2004-2016)

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrator and Chief of Staff

Additional roles included: Senior Vice President, Human Resources; Secretary and Deputy/Assistant General Counsel

Practiced corporate law as a member of the business department, Saul Ewing (1999-2004)
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Director, Climate Real Impact Solutions II Acquisition Corp. (NYSE: CLIM.U) (2021-2022)

Director, Advanced Disposal Services (NYSE: ADSW) (2017-2020)

Director, Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY) (2012-2017)
ORGANIZATIONS

Co-Chair, Advisory Board of the Gupta Governance Institute, Drexel University, an institute that advocates for improved governance practices for public, private and nonprofit organizations through programming, knowledge sharing and research

Trustee, Lafayette College (member of Presidential Search Committee)

Trustee, New York Public Radio (co-chair of President and CEO Search Committee)

Trustee, AAPIP (Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders in Philanthropy)

Trustee, Philanthropy New York

Member, Nominating and Governance Peer Group Steering Committee, Women Corporate Directors
EDUCATION

JD, Syracuse University

MA, Political Science, University of Pennsylvania

AB, Lafayette College
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 15

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_mcgrath-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Nominating & Corporate Governance
SHEILA K. McGRATH
Age: 58
Director Since: 2023
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – Given her background as a senior REIT research analyst and involvement with several industry organizations such as the Real Estate Investment Advisory Counsel (REIAC) and National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), Ms. McGrath has a strong understanding of REITs and the real estate sector
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – As a Senior Equity Research Analyst for over 25 years, with the past 10 years at Evercore, Ms. McGrath has broad expertise in analyzing and evaluating the financial and public market considerations of M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and brings valuable insight into our balance sheet management policies
Finance or Accounting – Through her 25+ years of experience as a REIT research analyst, Ms. McGrath has deep expertise in REIT fundamentals and valuation
Credit or Principal Investing – As a commercial real estate appraiser with the Member of Appraisal Institute (MAI) designation while at CB Commercial, Ms. McGrath brings deep knowledge of commercial real estate valuation and feasibility analysis conducted for financial institutions and institutional investors for both equity investment and debt financing purposes
Investor Communications and Outreach – Given her sell-side research expertise, Ms. McGrath has both an acute understanding of the investor perspective and deep institutional relationships, which enhance our investor communications and outreach
ESG – Through her roles with NAREIT’s Dividends Through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and the Gaining and Retaining Outstanding Women program at Rutgers’ Business Schools’ Center for Women in Business, Ms. McGrath has experience leading on diversity, equity and inclusion in our industry
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Principal, Grayton Advisory (2022-present)

Senior Managing Director, Equity REITs, Real Estate Operating Companies, Evercore (2012-2022)

Managing Director, Senior Vice President and Member of the Research Review and Leadership Committees, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods (2007-2012)

Senior Equity research analyst covering REITs for more than 20 years at other financial organizations, including Smith Barney, UBS and Dresdner Kleinwort

Valued commercial real estate properties in the real estate advisory and valuation group at CB Commercial
ORGANIZATIONS

Member of the Advisory Board of Governors, Real Estate Investment Advisory Counsel (REIAC), Steering Committee of the Dividends Through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and Best Financial Practices Committee, NAREIT

Founding Member of the Board of the Center for Women in Business and Mentor for GROW (Gaining and Retaining Outstanding Women), Rutgers Business School

Associate Member of a variety of industry organizations including International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) and the Urban Land Institute (ULI)
EDUCATION

MBA, Finance and Real Estate, Rutgers University

AB, Lafayette College
16 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sanders-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance
W. REID SANDERS
Age: 73
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – In various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Silver Bay Realty Trust, Mid-America Apartment Communities and Sanders Properties, Mr. Sanders has extensive REIT and real estate sector experience
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – In various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Mid-America Apartment Communities, Silver Bay Realty Trust and Sanders Properties, Mr. Sanders has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and in balance sheet management
Finance or Accounting – Through Mr. Sanders’ extensive background in the financial services industry, he possesses strong financial literacy and experience to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Credit or Principal Investing – As a director of Two Harbors and former executive at Southeastern Asset Management, Longleaf Partners Mutual Funds and First Tennessee Investment Management, among others, Mr. Sanders has extensive investing experience
Operations and Management – In various director and management positions at Two Harbors, Mid-America Apartment Communities and Sanders Properties, among others, Mr. Sanders has experience managing operations in the real estate industry
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – Mr. Sanders has served as a director for multiple public companies, including Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO), Mid-America Apartment Communities (NYSE: MAA) and Silver Bay (NYSE: SBY)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

President, Sanders Properties (2004-present)

Investment Committee Member, Cypress Realty (2002-present)

Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Southeastern Asset Management

President, Longleaf Partners Mutual Funds

Investment Officer, First Tennessee Investment Management
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Director and Member of the Audit, Compensation and Risk Oversight Committees, Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO) (2009-present)

Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Mid-America Apartment Communities (NYSE: MAA) (2010-present)

Director and Member of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Strategic Planning Committees, Independent Bank (2004-present)

Advisory Board Member, SSM Venture Partners III (2000-present)

Director, Silver Bay Realty Trust (NYSE: SBY) (2015-2017)

Chairman of the Board, Two Rivers Capital Management (2004-2007)

Director, Harbor Global (2001-2006)

Director, PIOglobal Asset Management (2001-2006)

Director, TBA Entertainment (2000-2004)

Director, The Pioneer Group (1999-2000)
ORGANIZATIONS

Chairman of the Board, Hugo Dixon Foundation

Trustee, Dixon Gallery and Gardens Endowment Fund, and Dixon Gallery and Gardens
EDUCATION

BA, University of Virginia
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 17

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_woodhousebw-pn.jpg]
Independent Director
Committee(s):
Compensation (Chair), Audit, Nominating & Corporate Governance
HOPE B. WOODHOUSE
Age: 66
Director Since: 2017
KEY SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
Real Estate or REIT – As a director of Two Harbors Investment Corp., Ms. Woodhouse has developed knowledge of REITs and the real estate sector
Strategic Opportunities or Balance Sheet Management – Through various director and management positions, including at Two Harbors Investment Corp., Piper Jaffray and Seoul Securities, Ms. Woodhouse has experience navigating and evaluating M&A, capital markets and other strategic opportunities and in balance sheet management
Finance or Accounting – As a qualified financial expert on the Audit Committee, Ms. Woodhouse has the experience and financial literacy to oversee financial reporting and internal controls
Credit or Principal Investing – As a former executive at Bridgewater Associates, Soros Fund Management, Tiger Management and Salomon Brothers, Ms. Woodhouse brings extensive investing experience
Operations and Management – As a former executive at Bridgewater Associates, Soros Fund Management, Tiger Management and Salomon Brothers, Ms. Woodhouse brings extensive management and operations experience, including the oversight of human resources
Prior Public Board or Governance Experience – Ms. Woodhouse has served as a director for multiple public companies, including Two Harbors Investment Corp (NYSE: TWO), Piper Jaffray (NYSE: PJC), Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE: AKR) and Monro (NASDAQ: MNRO)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Chief Operating Officer, Bridgewater Associates (2005-2009)

President and Chief Operating Officer, Auspex Group (2003-2005)

Chief Operating Officer, Soros Fund Management

Treasurer, Tiger Management

Managing Director, Salomon Brothers
OTHER CORPORATE BOARDS

Trustee and Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE: AKR) (2023-present)

Director and Member of the Compensation and Audit Committees, Monro, Inc. (NASDAQ: MNRO) (2023-present)

Director, Chair of the Risk Oversight Committee and Member of the Audit Committee, Two Harbors Investment Group (NYSE: TWO) (2012-present)

Director, Atomyze (2020-2022)

Director, Piper Jaffray (NYSE: PJC) (2011-2014)

Director, Seoul Securities (2001-2003)
ORGANIZATIONS

Director, Children’s Services Advisory Committee of Indian River Country

Director, John’s Island Community Service League

Trustee, Tiger Foundation
EDUCATION

MBA, Harvard University

AB, Georgetown University
18 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_propos1-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. These individuals bring a range of relevant experiences and perspectives that is essential to good governance and leadership of our Company.

“FOR”
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.gif]
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 19

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Corporate Governance and
Board Matters
Governance Documents
Our Board is committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in conjunction with our Charter, Bylaws and Board committee charters, provide the framework for the corporate governance practices described in this proxy statement.
We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees, and specifically to our principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to detect and deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and other public communications;

Appropriate treatment of confidential corporate information;

A safe and healthy work environment that is free from discrimination and harassment;

Compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

Fair dealing with counterparties, suppliers, competitors, colleagues and others;

Protection and proper use of Company assets;

Prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to appropriate persons identified in therein; and

Accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also establishes that our Company does not make contributions to political candidates, political parties or political campaigns or to intermediary organizations such as political action committees.
You can access our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on our website at www.gpmtreit.com or by writing to our Investor Relations department by email to investors@gpmtreit.com or by regular mail to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
Director Independence
New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, listing standards require that a majority of a company’s board of directors be composed of “independent directors,” which is defined generally as a director having no material relationship with the company that, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with the foregoing, our Board has affirmatively determined, upon the review and recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that each of the following directors and director nominees meets the qualifications of an independent director:

Tanuja M. Dehne;

Stephen G. Kasnet;

Sheila K. McGrath;
20 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

W. Reid Sanders; and

Hope B. Woodhouse.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board is led by a Chair who is appointed by the directors to preside at all meetings of our stockholders and of our Board and to perform such other duties and exercise such powers as from time to time shall be prescribed in our Bylaws or Corporate Governance Guidelines or by our Board. Under our governance documents, both independent and non-independent directors are eligible for appointment as the Chair, and our Board is able to change its structure if it determines that such a change is appropriate and in the best interest of our Company.
Our Board has appointed Stephen G. Kasnet, who qualifies as an independent director, to serve as our Chair. As detailed in his biographical statement above, Mr. Kasnet brings a wealth of corporate leadership and industry experience to the position. Our Board believes that separating the Chair role from the CEO role provides the appropriate balance at this time between the authority of those who oversee our Company and those who manage it on a day-to-day basis.
Committee Member Qualifications
Our Board has formed three standing committees: the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Each committee is composed solely of directors who meet the independence requirements of the NYSE, including with respect to our Compensation Committee, the NYSE’s independence requirements specific to members of listed companies’ compensation committees. Additionally, our Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of “non-employee directors,” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
In accordance with NYSE rules, each member of our Audit Committee is financially literate, in that they are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. In addition, our Board has determined that both Stephen G. Kasnet and Hope B. Woodhouse qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as defined under SEC rules and regulations.
Committee Responsibilities
Information about the current membership and key responsibilities of each of our standing committees follows. The committees’ purpose and responsibilities are more fully set forth in their charters, which are available on our website or at the address listed under “Governance Documents” above. The committees review their charters at least annually.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 21

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Stephen G. Kasnet (Chair)
W. Reid Sanders
Hope B. Woodhouse
Meetings in 2022: 7
Key Responsibilities:

Review interim financial information and audited financial statements included in reports filed with the SEC;

Review financial information included in earnings press releases issued by our Company;

Produce the Audit Committee Report;

Review the adequacy and effectiveness of our Company’s system of internal accounting controls;

Review our Company’s assessment and management of its risk exposures;

Review, approve and oversee any related person transactions as defined by SEC rules and regulations;

Oversee our Company’s compliance and ethics programs;

Oversee our Company’s internal audit activities; and

Be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditor.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Hope B. Woodhouse (Chair)
Tanuja M. Dehne
W. Reid Sanders
Meetings in 2022: 10
Key Responsibilities:

Establish our Company’s general compensation philosophy for the CEO and other executive officers;

Determine all matters relating to the compensation of the CEO and other executive officers, including corporate goals and objectives tied to compensation;

Administer, review and make recommendations to our Board with respect to our Company’s incentive compensation plans;

Review and recommend to our Board compensation programs applicable to directors;

Review our Company’s human capital management strategies and practices;

Review and assess the incentives and risks arising from our Company’s compensation programs and plans; and

Produce the Compensation Committee Report.
22 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Tanuja M. Dehne (Chair)
Sheila K. McGrath
W. Reid Sanders
Hope B. Woodhouse
Meetings in 2022: 5
Key Responsibilities:

Assist our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to assure that our Company is governed in a manner consistent with the interest of its stockholders;

Recommend to our Board changes in the size, composition, organization and operational structure of the Board and its committees;

Recommend to our Board director nominees to stand for election or re-election, conducting a search to identify a nominee or nominees in the event of a vacancy or newly created Board seat;

Make recommendations to our Board regarding director qualifications, eligibility criteria and independence;

Review, and assist our Board in overseeing, our Company’s ESG priorities, strategies and related public disclosures; and

Oversee the evaluation of the effectiveness of our Board, its committees and directors.
Board and Committee Meetings
Our Board meets on a regularly scheduled basis during the year to review significant developments affecting our Company and to act on matters requiring Board approval. It also holds special meetings when important matters require Board action between scheduled meetings. Members of senior management regularly attend Board meetings to report on and discuss their areas of responsibility. In addition, our Board and its committees are able to consult with and retain independent legal, financial or other advisors as they deem necessary and appropriate from time to time. The independent directors have the opportunity to meet in executive session, without management present, at each Board meeting. Mr. Kasnet provides over these sessions as our Board’s independent Chair.
Directors are encouraged to attend all meetings of our Board and of the Company’s stockholders. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings held by our Board and all committees on which he or she served during 2022. Each of our then-current directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders held in June 2022.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 23

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Board, Committee and Director Assessment
Our Board conducts an annual assessment of its performance and the performance of its committees and individual directors. The Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (abbreviated as “N&CG Committee” below) is responsible for leading the assessment, which takes place in advance of the annual consideration of director nominees. The assessment is used to inform director nomination considerations and identify opportunities to enhance Board and committee effectiveness, including the relationship between management and our Board and committees.
The assessment carried out in early 2023 followed the process depicted below.
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_direct-pn.jpg]
24 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Role of Our Board in Risk Oversight
Our management team is responsible for assessing and managing the risks faced by our Company, subject to the oversight of our Board. Management routinely informs our Board and its committees of developments that could affect our risk profile or other aspects of our business. Our Board fulfills its oversight responsibilities as a full Board or through delegation to its committees as described below.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board exercises broad oversight of our Company’s risk management, including through the review of our business plans, capital structure and financial results. Our Board has also established investment guidelines, which set parameters for the type and size of investments management can make without further Board approval.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
This committee is primarily responsible for reviewing our Company’s assessment and management of its risk exposures:

Guidelines and policies to govern risk management and assessment;

The adequacy of our Company’s insurance coverage;

Any uninsured or commercially uninsurable risks;

Our Company’s interest rate risk management;

Our Company’s counterparty and credit risks;

Our Company’s information security and technology risks (including cybersecurity); and

Any environmental risks relating to our Company, including those related to climate change.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
This committee is responsible for assessing the risks arising from our compensation programs and plans.
It also reviews our human capital management strategies and practices.
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
This committee recommends appropriate corporate governance practices.
It also reviews our Company’s ESG priorities, strategies and public disclosures.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 25

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Director Nomination Process and Considerations
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to our Board the range of qualifications that should be represented on our Board and eligibility criteria for membership on our Board and its committees, as well as recommending director nominees to stand for election or re-election to our Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the following qualification standards applicable to our directors:

Possession of the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;

The ability to exercise good business judgment and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our Company and its stockholders;

Having an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and

The ability and willingness to devote sufficient time and effort to carrying out Board duties and responsibilities effectively.
In considering candidates for nomination as a director to fill an existing vacancy or add a member, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts a search to identify potential candidates based on their mix of skills and qualifications and the contribution that the candidate could be expected to make to the overall functioning of our Board. With respect to the re-nomination of incumbent directors, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the foregoing factors, as well as past participation in, and contributions to, the activities of our Board and its committees.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that our Company shall endeavor to have a Board representing diverse education and experience that provides knowledge of business, financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. Our Company also considers diversity of gender, race, ethnicity, age and background in the composition of our Board. To that end, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take reasonable steps to assemble a diverse pool of nominees when conducting searches for new directors, and any search firm engaged by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be affirmatively instructed to seek to include diverse candidates.
In furtherance of our expectation that directors devote significant time to their service on our Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors who also serve as chief executive officers or hold equivalent positions at other public companies should not serve on more than one other public company board in addition to our Board, and other directors should not serve on more than three other boards of public companies in addition to our Board. Our Board has not adopted term limits or a mandatory retirement age because it believes that a director’s tenure is more appropriately determined through the Board assessment and re-nomination processes.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended for nomination to our Board by our stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for nominees to our Board should be submitted in writing to our Secretary. The manner in which our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates recommended by stockholders is the same as any other candidate, except that the committee will also seek and consider information concerning any relationship between a stockholder recommending a candidate and the candidate to determine whether the candidate can represent the interests of all of our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not consider a candidate recommended by a stockholder unless the stockholder’s proposal provides a certification that the potential candidate consents to being named in a proxy statement relating to the stockholders’ meeting and will serve as a director if elected.
Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections
Our Bylaws provide that in uncontested elections (which occurs when the number of director nominees equals the number of directors to be elected), a nominee for director will be elected to the Board if the number of votes cast “for” the nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that nominee’s election.
If a director nominee who is an incumbent director receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election, and with respect to whom no successor has been elected, such incumbent director shall
26 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
promptly tender his or her offer to resign to our Board for its consideration following certification of the stockholder vote. Within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the tendered resignation offer and make a recommendation to our Board whether or not to accept such offer, and our Board shall act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation.
In determining whether to accept the resignation offer, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation offer, including, among other things, whether accepting the resignation of such director would cause our Company to fail to meet any applicable SEC or NYSE rules or requirements. Thereafter, our Board shall promptly and publicly disclose its decision-making process regarding whether to accept the director’s resignation offer or the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable, in a Current Report on Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. Any director who tenders his or her resignation offer will not participate in our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or our Board’s action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If our Board does not accept the director’s resignation offer, such director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.
In a contested election, the director nominees who receive a plurality of all the votes cast at a meeting of stockholders duly called and at which a quorum is present will be elected as directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of nominees equal to the number of vacancies to be filled who receive more votes than other nominees are elected to our Board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of votes cast.
Communications with Our Board
We provide the opportunity for our stockholders and all other interested parties to communicate with members of our Board. Stockholders and all other interested parties may communicate with the independent directors or the chair of any of the committees of our Board by email or regular mail. All communications should be sent to the Company’s Secretary, Michael J. Karber.
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_internet-pn.jpg]
BY EMAIL
Please send correspondence via email to secretary@gpmtreit.com
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_mail-pn.jpg]
BY MAIL
Please send correspondence via regular mail to the attention of the independent directors, the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Compensation Committee or the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as the case may be, in each instance in care of the Secretary at the Company’s office at 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
Our Secretary will review each communication received in accordance with this process to determine whether the communication requires immediate action. Our Secretary will forward all appropriate communications received, or a summary of such communications, to the appropriate member(s) of our Board. However, we reserve the right to disregard any communication that we determine is unduly hostile, threatening or illegal, does not reasonably relate to our Company or is similarly inappropriate. Our Secretary has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.
Stockholder proposals must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our current Bylaws or the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and not the procedures set forth in the preceding paragraph or the procedures set forth in “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors – Director Nomination Process.” Nominations for our Board may only be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. Certain matters set forth in our Bylaws for stockholder proposals, including nominations
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 27

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
to our Board, as well as certain matters set forth in Rule 14a-8 for stockholder proposals, are described later in this proxy statement under “Other Matters – Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2024 Annual Meeting.”
Director Orientation and Continued Education
We provide each new director with a comprehensive orientation about our Company, including our business operations, strategy and governance. We also provide new directors with the opportunity to meet in one-on-one sessions with our Chief Executive Officer, other directors and other members of senior management.
In addition, we believe that our stockholders are best served by a board of directors composed of individuals who are well-versed in modern principles of corporate governance and other subject matters relevant to board service, and who thoroughly comprehend the role and responsibilities of an effective board in the oversight of our Company and its management. To this end, we have adopted a formal Director Education Policy under which our directors are encouraged to attend such director education programs as they deem appropriate to stay abreast of developments in corporate governance and “best practices” relevant to their contribution to our Board generally, as well as to their responsibilities in their specific committee assignments and other roles. We reimburse our directors for their reasonable costs and attendance fees to participate in such programs up to $5,000 per director each year.
Director Compensation
We compensate the independent members of our Board for their service. We believe that director compensation should achieve the following objectives:
Align the interests of our directors and our stockholdersAttract and retain outstanding director candidates to provide meaningful oversight of our businessReflect the substantial time commitment our directors make to their Board and committee service
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION CONSIDERATIONS
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to our Board regarding the compensation of our Company’s independent directors, which is set forth in our Director Compensation Policy. In doing so, our Compensation Committee will work with an independent compensation consultant and consider, among other things, the following:

The compensation that is paid to directors of other companies that are comparable to our Company;

The amount of time directors are expected to devote to preparing for and attending meetings of our Board and the committees on which they serve;

The success of our Company;

The additional responsibilities and time commitment associated with being a chair of our Board or one of its committees;

If a committee on which a director serves undertakes a special assignment, the importance of that special assignment to our Company and its stockholders; and

The risks involved in serving as a director on our Board or a member of its committees.
ANNUAL RETAINERS FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
Under our Director Compensation Policy, we pay retainers to our independent directors in an equal mix of cash and equity. The cash retainers are paid quarterly in arrears, and the equity is awarded as restricted stock units, or RSUs, that are granted each year on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. The RSUs vest on the one-year anniversary of their grant date, with pro-rated vesting for a departure before that
28 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
anniversary. Independent directors who join our Board between annual meetings receive a pro-rated RSU award on the date of their appointment that vests on the first anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting. The RSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that, upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, pay out with respect to all outstanding RSUs.
Our Director Compensation Policy provides for the annual payments to independent directors described in the table below:
Cash
($)
Restricted
Stock
Unit Awards
($)
Board
Chair160,000160,000
Other Directors100,000100,000
Audit Committee
Chair10,00010,000
Other Members5,0005,000
Compensation Committee
Chair6,2506,250
Other Members3,7503,750
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Chair6,2506,250
Other Members3,7503,750
We do not pay retainers to directors who are not independent. All members of our Board, including directors who are not independent, are reimbursed for their costs and expenses of serving on our Board, including costs and expenses of attending Board and committee meetings. Directors may also be reimbursed for up to $5,000 per year for continuing education costs incurred in connection with their service on our Board.
SUPPLEMENTAL CHAIR COMPENSATION
In addition to the annual retainers set forth above, our current Board Chair, Stephen G. Kasnet, has been awarded supplemental compensation in recognition of the extraordinary administrative burdens placed on him in 2020 related to our Company’s transition from external management to internal management and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The supplemental chair compensation is payable in additional RSUs to be granted on an annual basis over a four-year period with a value of $155,000 per grant, subject to Mr. Kasnet’s continued service on our Board, for an aggregate award value of $620,000. The first of these four annual grants was made on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders in 2021, and the second was made on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders in 2022. Each of the supplemental RSU grants has the same vesting and dividend equivalent provisions as the annual retainer RSU grants.
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Our directors are encouraged to own shares of our Company’s common stock to better align their personal interests with the interests of our stockholders. In furtherance of this objective, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each independent director is expected to accumulate shares of common stock with a minimum market value equal to three times such director’s annual cash retainer. Unvested RSUs are included in determining whether a director has satisfied the applicable minimum ownership level.
A director is expected to attain the minimum ownership level within five years of appointment or election. If the minimum amount is not attained by such date – or is not maintained after such date – the director is expected to retain at least 50% of the shares issued upon settlement of equity awards (net of shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations) until attaining the ownership level.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 29

Corporate Governance and Board Matters
As of December 31, 2022, only one of our independent directors on the Board at that time held the minimum ownership level based on market value when measured with the year-end closing stock price (on December 30, 2022) of $5.36 per share. In comparison, all independent directors had held the minimum ownership level at the end of 2021, which was measured using the year-end closing stock price (on December 31, 2021) of $11.71 per share. The difference between the ownership levels for the two years is solely due to fluctuations in our stock price, as no independent director sold any shares during 2022. Consequently, all independent directors have been deemed to meet the guidelines’ current retention expectation.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2022
The following table shows the compensation paid to the individuals who served as independent directors of our Board during any part of the year ended December 31, 2022. John (“Jack”) A. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board, did not receive any compensation for his service as a director; the compensation he received as an executive officer is reported in the Summary Compensation Table later in this proxy statement. Sheila K. McGrath was elected to the Board in January 2023 and therefore did not receive any compensation for 2022.
NameFees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
(1)(2)
($)
Total
($)
Tanuja M. Dehne110,000109,992219,992
Stephen G. Kasnet170,000324,998494,998
W. Reid Sanders112,500112,491224,991
Hope B. Woodhouse115,000114,991229,991
(1)
The values in this column represent the fair value of awards of RSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and are based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date of the applicable award.
(2)
The independent directors held the following number of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2022:
NameRestricted Stock Units
Ms. Dehne9,945
Mr. Kasnet29,385
Mr. Sanders10,171
Ms. Woodhouse10,397
30 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Certain Relationships and Transactions
Certain Relationships and Transactions
Related Person Transactions Policy
Our Board has adopted a written Related Person Transactions Policy setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval of transactions between our Company and its Related Persons. “Related Persons” under the policy include our directors, director nominees, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, plus those persons’ immediate family members and affiliated entities, as defined in the policy.
The policy requires that the Audit Committee review and approve all transactions, arrangements or relationships, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which:

Our Company is or will be a participant;

The expected amount involved exceeds $120,000; and

A Related Person has or will have a material direct or indirect interest.
The policy directs the Audit Committee to approve such a transaction only if it determines that the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of our Company and its stockholders.
Transactions with Related Persons
CREDIT AGREEMENT AND INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT
On September 25, 2020, we (i) entered into a term loan credit agreement, or the Credit Agreement, with certain investment vehicles managed by Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, or the Initial Lenders, and (ii) in connection with the transactions contemplated by the foregoing, entered into an investor rights agreement, or the Investor Rights Agreement, which, among other things, granted the Initial Lenders certain governance and other rights and also contained certain standstill provisions applicable to the Initial Lenders and others.
Devin Chen was appointed to our Board in October 2020 pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement and was subsequently elected to our Board at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Chen served on our Board until the date of our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders but did not stand for re-election at that meeting. In 2022, we paid the Initial Lenders interest and other expenses and repaid the remaining $150 million of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
We have entered into customary indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers that require us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and our Articles of Amendment and Restatement against any claim or liability that may arise by reason of their service to us. The agreements also require us to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. In addition, each agreement provides for procedures for the determination of entitlement to indemnification, including requiring that such determination be made by independent counsel after a change in control of our Company.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 31

Security Ownership and Reporting
Security Ownership and Reporting
Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GPMT.” The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 15, 2023 (unless otherwise indicated) by each of our “Named Executive Officers,” as such term is defined in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K, and directors and by all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares of common stock if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of March 15, 2023. “Voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.
Under our Insider Trading Policy, our officers, directors and employees are prohibited from hedging or pledging shares of our stock in any manner, whether as collateral for a loan, in a margin account held at a broker or otherwise.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent
of Class
(2)
Directors
Tanuja M. Dehne27,093*
Stephen G. Kasnet63,207(3)*
Sheila K. McGrath*
W. Reid Sanders112,508 (4)*
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor(5)
260,556*
Hope B. Woodhouse44,915*
Named Executive Officers
Stephen Alpart135,080*
Peter Morral63,065*
Steven Plust180,016*
Marcin Urbaszek67,152(6)*
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 individuals)978,8191.9%
*
Represents ownership of less than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock as of March 15, 2023.
(1)
The business address of each of the individuals is 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
(2)
Based on 52,383,979 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2023.
(3)
Includes 312 shares of common stock held by the Kasnet Family Foundation, over which Mr. Kasnet has shared voting and investment control with his spouse, and 62,895 shares of common stock Mr. Kasnet owns jointly with his spouse.
(4)
Includes 12,000 shares of common stock held by Green Meadows, LLC. Mr. Sanders is the managing member and a 2% owner of Green Meadows, LLC.
(5)
Mr. Taylor is also a Named Executive Officer.
(6)
Includes 94 shares of common stock held by Mr. Urbaszek’s mother.
32 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Security Ownership and Reporting
Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent
of Our Common Stock
Based on their filings made under Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act, the persons known by us to be beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock are as follows:
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerNumber of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent
of Class
(1)
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 100
9,246,925(2)17.7%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
3,580,044(3)6.8%
(1)
Based on 52,383,979 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2023.
(2)
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 31, 2023, by BlackRock, Inc. reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 9,127,377 shares, shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 0 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares reported.
(3)
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, by The Vanguard Group reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 35,539 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,501,605 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 78,439 shares.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 33

Information about Our Executive Officers
Information about Our
Executive Officers
The following sets forth the positions, ages and selected biographical information for our executive officers as of April 1, 2023. John (“Jack”) A. Taylor’s biographical information is provided in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Proposal 1: Election of Directors.” There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he was selected as an executive officer.
Stephen Alpart
Age: 59
Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

Mr. Alpart has been our Vice President and Chief Investment Officer since our Company’s inception in 2017. He is also our Co-Head of Originations and a member of our Investment Committee.

From 2014 to 2020, he was a Managing Director at Pine River Capital Management, L.P., our Former Manager.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, Mr. Alpart was a Managing Director in the Global Real Estate Finance Group at Prudential Real Estate Investment (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company) from 2009 to 2014, responsible for managing a series of close-end debt funds in the United States.

Previously, Mr. Alpart was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group at GMAC Commercial Mortgage and Capmark Investments where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and private owner/operators. Prior to that, he was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group at PaineWebber & Co., an investment bank and stock brokerage firm, and later an Executive Director in the Real Estate Group of UBS Group AG, a Swiss multinational investment bank and financial services company, where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and owner/operators.

He has worked in real estate finance and debt investing for over 25 years in a variety of functions, including third-party funds management, proprietary on-book lending, transaction advisory business, loan syndications, loan sales and workouts/ restructurings.

Mr. Alpart received an MBA, Finance and Real Estate. From New York University and a BS in Business Administration, Accounting and Economics from Washington University.
34 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Information about Our Executive Officers
Michael Karber
Age: 43
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Mr. Karber has served as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since 2020. He has been with our Company since its inception in 2017, previously serving as Deputy General Counsel from 2018 to 2019 and as Assistant Secretary from 2018 to 2020.

Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Karber was Lead Counsel – Business Operations at Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), a hybrid mortgage real estate investment trust, beginning in 2014.

Prior to joining Two Harbors, he was a Portfolio Manager at Presidium Asset Solutions, an asset management and loan servicing company, from 2010 to 2014.

From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Karber was an Associate at Pircher, Nicols & Meeks LLP, and he was previously an Associate at Schwartz Cooper Chartered (now known as Dykema Gossett PLLC).

Mr. Karber received a JD from Northwestern University, Pritzker School of Law, and a BA in Political Science and Psychology from the University of Michigan.
Peter Morral
Age: 55
Vice President and Chief Development Officer

Mr. Morral has been our Vice President and Chief Development Officer since 2020 and has been our Co-Head of Originations and a member of our Investment Committee since our Company’s inception in 2017.

From 2014 to 2020, he was a Managing Director at our Former Manager.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, he served as a Managing Director in Annaly Capital’s Commercial Real Estate Group.

Prior to joining Annaly Capital, Mr. Morral was a Managing Director and member of the Investment Committee at UBS Securities, LLC where he was responsible for institutional client and large loan originations, investment banking coverage, subordinate debt pricing and distribution and loan syndications.

He has worked in real estate finance and debt investing for over 20 years in a variety of functions, including on-balance sheet lending, syndications and investing, credit policy and underwriting, and CMBS loan originations, pricing, ratings and credit distribution.

Mr. Morral received an MBA from the Ohio State University and a BLA in History from the University of Connecticut.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 35

Information about Our Executive Officers
Steven Plust
Age: 64
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Plust has been our Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since our Company’s inception in 2017. He is also a member of our Investment Committee.

From 2014 to 2020, he was a Managing Director at our Former Manager.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, Mr. Plust was a Managing Director in the Global Real Estate Finance Group at Prudential Real Estate Investment (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company) from 2009 to 2014, responsible for managing a series of close-end debt funds in the United States.

He has over 25 years of experience in real estate finance and capital markets and was an advisor to the Resolution Trust Corporation in the development and implementation of its securitization programs.

Mr. Plust has worked for over 20 years in principal investing platforms on Wall Street and in investment management, where he has been primarily responsible for transaction pricing and structuring, credit risk assessment and analysis of complex transactions and multi-asset portfolios.

Mr. Plust received an MBA from Columbia University and a BS in Chemistry from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Marcin Urbaszek
Age: 47
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Head of Investor Relations

Mr. Urbaszek has been our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Head of Investor Relations since our Company’s inception in 2017.

He joined our Former Manager in May 2013 and, until the formation of our Company, served as a Managing Director of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (NYSE: TWO), a hybrid mortgage real estate investment trust, focusing on corporate development and capital markets activities.

Prior to joining our Former Manager, Mr. Urbaszek worked in the Investment Banking Division at Credit Suisse Group AG from 2006 to April 2013, most recently serving as a team lead and partner on coverage and strategic transaction execution for various financial institutions, including residential and commercial mortgage lenders.

He has over 20 years of finance experience, including capital markets and equity research, with the last 15 years dedicated to financial institutions.

Over the course of his career, Mr. Urbaszek has been primarily responsible for strategic and capital raising transaction execution, as well as financial planning and analysis.

Mr. Urbaszek received a BBA in Finance, with a Minor focused on Financial Accounting and Economics, from Zicklin School of Business, Bernard M. Baruch College, CUNY. Mr. Urbaszek is a CFA® charterholder.
36 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Discussion
and Analysis
This “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section describes our compensation program for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. These Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, are as follow:
JOHN (“JACK”)
A. TAYLOR
MARCIN
URBASZEK
STEPHEN
ALPART
PETER
MORRAL
STEVEN
PLUST
President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorVice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerVice President and Chief Investment OfficerVice President and Chief Development OfficerVice President and Chief Operating Officer
“CD&A” Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERVIEWp. 38

Program Evolution

Executive Compensation Components Awarded in 2022

2022 Target Pay Levels

Results Under Performance-Based Awards

Quality Compensation Practices
HOW EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IS DETERMINEDp. 40

Background of Our Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Roles and Responsibilities in Executive Compensation Decisions

Employment Agreements

Peer Group

Say on Pay Vote
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTSp. 43

2022 Base Salary

2022 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) Awards

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) Awards Granted in 2022

Benefits
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICESp. 51

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Prohibition Against Hedging and Pledging

Forfeiture and Clawback Policy

Compensation Risk Assessment
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 37

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_left-pn.jpg]
Executive Compensation Overview
PROGRAM EVOLUTION
Until December 31, 2020, we were externally managed by Pine River Capital Management L.P., our Former Manager. We entered into a definitive agreement with our Former Manager on October 10, 2020, pursuant to which we internalized our management on December 31, 2020, or the Internalization. We did not have any employees prior to the Internalization; our NEOs were employed by an affiliate of our Former Manager.
Our Compensation Committee instituted a comprehensive executive compensation program for our internally managed company in 2021 that was designed to incentivize, reward and retain our executive officers and align their interests with stockholders’ interests. The transition to being an internally managed company had profound implications for our executive compensation program and disclosure, and we caution placing significant reliance on any trailing analyses that include compensation results prior to the Internalization.
The overall structure of the executive compensation program implemented in 2021 remained intact for 2022. The components and pay levels of the compensation paid to our NEOs in 2022 are summarized in this “Executive Compensation Overview” section. Please read the remainder of this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the tabular and narrative disclosure that follows for more complete information about the compensation paid to our NEOs in 2022.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS AWARDED IN 2022
CashBase Salary

Intended to provide market-competitive fixed income

Only element of total direct compensation not at performance risk
Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)

Target amount set as percentage of base salary (100% for CEO and 75% for each of the other NEOs)

Performance period: 2022

Pays out at 0% – 200% of target amount

Performance metrics:

50% quantitative metrics – “Core” ROAE (return on average equity), weighted 66.7% on an absolute basis and 33.3% on a relative basis

50% qualitative metrics – strategic objectives fundamental to the business
EquityPerformance Stock Units (PSUs)

50% of equity award value delivered as PSUs

Performance period: 2022-2024

Vests at 0% – 200% of target number of units

Performance metrics: absolute and relative “Core” ROAE, each weighted 50%
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

50% of equity award value delivered as RSUs

Three-year ratable vesting
Our Compensation Committee changed the program structure in early 2023 by diversifying the financial performance metrics used in the incentive awards. Instead of using absolute and relative “Core” ROAE for both short-term cash and long-term equity awards, the 2023 AIP awards use absolute “run-rate” ROAE and absolute change in book value per share as the quantitative performance metrics, and the PSUs granted in 2023 use absolute and relative “run-rate” ROAE and absolute and relative change in book value per share as performance metrics. Our Compensation Committee believes that this revised structure results in more balanced compensation opportunities and is better aligned with stockholder value. Details of these performance metrics and the 2023 awards’ structure will be included in our 2024 proxy statement.
38 / gpmtreit.com/investors

[MISSING IMAGE: bc_right-pn.jpg]
2022 TARGET PAY LEVELS
Named Executive Officer2022
Base Salary
Target AIP Award
for 2022
Performance
RSU Award
Granted in 2022
Target PSU Award
Granted in 2022
Target Total
Direct
Compensation 
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor$  1,000,000$  1,000,000$  1,125,000$  1,125,000$  4,250,000 
Marcin Urbaszek$560,000$420,000$485,000$485,000$1,950,000 
Stephen Alpart$600,000$450,000$600,000$600,000$2,250,000 
Peter Morral$600,000$450,000$600,000$600,000$2,250,000 
Steven Plust$600,000$450,000$600,000$600,000$2,250,000 
RESULTS UNDER PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
As described in detail under “Executive Compensation Components – 2022 AIP Awards” below, the Company’s 2022 performance was below the threshold levels for the absolute and relative “Core” ROAE metrics and therefore earned 0% of target levels for the quantitative component. Our Compensation Committee determined that the executive team achieved target-level performance with respect to the AIP’s qualitative metrics in the context of very uncertain and challenging market conditions. The 0% quantitative performance combined with 100% qualitative performance yielded payouts of 50% of the NEOs’ respective 2022 AIP target amounts.
Because 2021 was the first year that PSUs were granted, no PSU performance period has been completed as of December 31, 2022, and there is no performance-based equity award earn-out to report. The first PSU performance period will end on December 31, 2023, and results will be reported in our 2024 proxy statement.
QUALITY COMPENSATION PRACTICES
What We Do
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.gif]

A significant majority of each NEO’s compensation is at risk

Our forfeiture and clawback policy allows recoupment of cash or equity awards upon a financial restatement

We have adopted meaningful stock ownership requirements applicable to our NEOs

Our Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant who provides no other services to our Company

Performance-based cash and equity awards have a sliding scale earn-out structure that allows for 0% payouts
and is capped at 200% of target amounts

We conduct an annual compensation risk assessment
What We Don’t Do
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_dont-bw.gif]

Our NEOs do not receive perquisites or retirement plans not available to other employees

We do not allow our NEOs to hedge or pledge their Company stock

We do not have single-trigger accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change of control of our Company

We do not pay dividends on any performance-based equity units that are not earned through satisfaction of the awards’ performance metrics

Our NEOs do not have guaranteed bonuses

We do not provide tax gross-ups

Our NEOs’ employment agreements do not provide for excessive severance payments
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 39

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
How Executive Compensation Is Determined
BACKGROUND OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Prior to the Internalization on December 31, 2020, we were managed by our Former Manager and did not have any employees. Our NEOs were employed by an affiliate of our Former Manager and did not receive cash compensation directly from our Company before 2021, other than a one-time bonus paid at the end of 2020 in conjunction with the Internalization. Our Former Manager and its affiliates also determined whether, and to what extent, our NEOs were provided with employee benefit plans. Prior to the Internalization, we reimbursed our Former Manager for certain executive compensation costs it incurred on our behalf.
Although we did not directly pay regular cash compensation to our NEOs prior to the Internalization, we did grant them equity awards under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan to align their interests with those of our stockholders. Equity awards granted to our NEOs before 2021 were in the form of restricted stock, except for a one-time award of RSUs granted at the end of 2020 in conjunction with the Internalization. Those units will vest in full on the fifth anniversary of the grant date, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
Total compensation reported for our executives for 2021 and 2022 (our first two years as an internally managed company) is not fully comparable to total compensation reported for our executives in prior years (when we were externally managed). Prior to 2021, we did not report our executives’ base salary and annual incentive compensation because they were not employed by us and their cash compensation was paid directly by our Former Manager.
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
Our compensation program philosophy is to provide an attractive, flexible and market-based total compensation program tied to performance and aligned with stockholders’ interests.
Our total rewards philosophy is designed to:
Attract, retain and incentivize the best talent to support our business objectivesPay for performance by linking compensation to the achievement of short-term and long-term financial and strategic goalsAlign the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by tying elements of executive compensation to corporate performance and generated returnsEnsure fair, equitable and competitive pay practices
Our Compensation Committee instituted a comprehensive executive compensation program for our internally managed company in 2021 that is designed to achieve these objectives through a mix of compensation components and sound governance practices. The overall structure of the executive compensation program implemented in 2021 remained intact for 2022.
40 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Role of the Compensation Committee
Our Board’s Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for setting all compensation paid to our executive officers. Our Compensation Committee establishes the structure of the executive compensation program, the levels paid to each executive and the performance goals for incentive-based compensation. Our Compensation Committee also recommends to our Board the amount and structure of compensation to be paid to independent directors.
When making executive compensation decisions, our Compensation Committee considers the financial performance of our Company over the prior year, market data and the competitive landscape for talent, the performance and experience of each executive officer, internal pay equity within the executive officer group, alignment with stockholder interests and risk mitigation.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
Our Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC, or Semler Brossy, as its independent compensation consultant in 2019. Semler Brossy advises our Compensation Committee on market practices, peer group composition, executive compensation program design and executive pay levels. Semler Brossy also provides advice on setting compensation for independent directors.
Semler Brossy does not provide any other services to our Company. Following a review of the relationship between our Company and Semler Brossy during 2022, our Compensation Committee concluded that Semler Brossy’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest.
Role of Executive Officers
In consultation with Semler Brossy, our Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to our Compensation Committee regarding compensation for the other executive officers. Our Chief Financial Officer assists our Chief Executive Officer in advising our Compensation Committee on corporate performance matters and the nature and levels of performance metrics for incentive-based compensation. No executive officer participates in Compensation Committee discussions setting his own pay.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
In connection with the Internalization, we entered into employment agreements with each of the NEOs pursuant to which each became employed directly by the Company on December 31, 2020, the effective date of the Internalization. Our Compensation Committee negotiated the employment agreements, with the advice of Semler Brossy, and our Board of Directors approved them.
The employment agreements established the following compensation terms applicable to 2021 and subsequent years. See “Executive Compensation Components” later in this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information about the compensation awarded in 2022 in accordance with the employment agreements.
Base Salary
Base salaries for the NEOs were initially set under the employment agreements as $1,000,000 for Mr. Taylor; $560,000 for Mr. Urbaszek; and $600,000 for each of Messrs. Alpart, Morral and Plust for 2021. These salary amounts are to be reviewed at least annually and may be increased in subsequent years.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 41

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Annual Incentive Cash Payment
Under their employment agreements, the NEOs are entitled to the opportunity to earn an annual incentive cash payment with a target value equal to 100% of base salary for Mr. Taylor and 75% of base salary for the other NEOs. The agreements set the payout value as 0% to 200% of target amount, depending on achievement against performance goals established by our Compensation Committee.
The percentages included in the employment agreements (100% for Mr. Taylor and 75% for the others) will be applied to any increase in base salary in subsequent years, which would lead to a corresponding increase in the award’s target value. Our Compensation Committee establishes performance goals each year.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The employment agreements with our NEOs provide that the NEOs are entitled to annual LTIP awards with a grant date value of $2,250,000 for Mr. Taylor; $670,000 for Mr. Urbaszek (which was increased to $970,000 in 2022); and $1,200,000 for each of Messrs. Alpart, Morral and Plust. The annual LTIP awards are to be granted (i) partially in a performance-based award to be earned at 0% to 200% of target amount, depending on achievement over a three-year period against performance metrics established by our Compensation Committee, and (ii) partially in a time-based award that vest ratably over three years. The total value of the LTIP awards granted in subsequent years may vary, as may the proportion of performance-based and time-based grants (initially set as 50%/50%). The awards have associated dividend equivalent rights, are subject to the NEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, and may be settled in shares or cash, at our Company’s option.
Other Terms
The employment agreements also provide that the NEOs are eligible to participate in all employee benefit programs made available to the Company’s employees generally from time to time and to receive payments upon termination or change in control of the Company as described in detail in “Executive Compensation –  Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” later in this proxy statement.
Each employment agreement also contains covenants relating to the treatment of confidential information and intellectual property matters and restrictions on the ability of each of the NEOs on the one hand and our Company on the other hand to disparage the other. In addition, the employment agreements provide that the NEO shall not, without the prior written consent of our Chief Executive Officer (or our Board, in the case of Mr. Taylor), (i) for a period of one year for Mr. Taylor, nine months for Messrs. Alpart and Plust and six months for Messrs. Morral and Urbaszek following the termination of the NEO’s employment relationship with our Company for any reason, engage in certain competitive activities and (ii) for a period of one year following the termination of the NEO’s employment relationship with our Company for any reason, solicit certain current or former employees or customers of our Company.
PEER GROUP
Our Compensation Committee does not have a policy to set executive pay levels to a particular market benchmark, but it does review market data assembled by Semler Brossy for information about pay levels for the individual executive officers – both total compensation levels and levels of the various compensation components – as well as pay practices. This data is used to assess the reasonableness of our Company’s executive compensation program in the context of a competitive marketplace for talent.
As an internally managed commercial mortgage REIT, we face the following challenges when identifying peers for the purposes of comparing our executives’ compensation to that of other companies:

There are a limited number of internally managed commercial mortgage REITs, which makes it difficult to identify companies that are directly comparable to our Company;

REITs with a residential mortgage focus have different business strategies than those focused on commercial mortgages; and
42 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

REITs that are externally managed often do not disclose the cash compensation received by their executives, which is typically paid by their managers. A comparison of our NEOs’ reported total compensation to the publicly disclosed total compensation paid to NEOs of externally managed companies may be misleading, because in the latter case base salary and annual incentive compensation paid by managers to NEOs of externally managed companies may not have been reported.
In the context of these comparative limitations, our Compensation Committee has worked with Semler Brossy to construct a peer group with the following characteristics:

All internally managed companies;

Primary focus is on commercial mortgage REITs, but can also include mortgage REIT companies with a mix of commercial and residential portfolios, as well as diversified REITs and companies in the commercial-focused real estate financial services or thrifts and mortgage finance industries; and

Are comparably sized, which is primarily evaluated based on book value of equity and assets, with consideration also given to market cap and revenue levels.
The peer group is reviewed annually and updated to reflect the companies that most closely fit the foregoing characteristics. The peer group used when 2022 compensation decisions were made consisted of the following companies:

Arbor Realty Trust Inc. (ABR)

BrightSpire Capital, Inc. (BRSP)

Capstead Mortgage Corporation (CMO)

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM)

Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX)

iStar Inc. (STAR)

Ladder Capital Corp (LADR)

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA)

New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. (NYMT)

Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT)

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD)
BrightSprire Capital, a recently internalized mortgage REIT in the commercial space, was a new addition to the peer group in 2022.
SAY ON PAY VOTE
At our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation. Approximately 97% of the votes cast at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders approved our executive compensation as described in our proxy statement for that meeting. Our Compensation Committee carefully considers stockholder votes on this matter, along with other expressions of stockholder views on compensation policies and desirable actions that the committee receives.
Executive Compensation Components
The principal components of our executive compensation program for 2022 are as follow:

Base salary;

Cash incentive awards paid under our Annual Incentive Plan, or AIP; and

Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, awards granted under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan:

50% of the LTIP award value was granted as PSUs, and

50% of the LTIP award value was granted as RSUs.
Each of these components is described in detail below. This mix of compensation components was designed to incentivize, reward and retain the executive officers, consistent with our compensation philosophy and our Company’s long-term business goals. We also provide our NEOs the health and welfare and retirement benefits available to our other employees.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 43

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2022 BASE SALARY
Base salary amounts for 2022 remained unchanged from 2021 amounts. The 2021 amounts were established in the NEOs’ respective employment agreements at competitive levels designed to reflect their experience and expertise and to motivate their continued service with our Company following the Internalization.
2022 AIP AWARDS
The AIP is designed to reward achievement of annual goals that support long-term value creation through the opportunity to earn cash payments. The awards described below were based on 2022 performance, were paid out in the first quarter of 2023, and are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
As described in detail below, the Company’s 2022 performance was below the threshold levels for the quantitative metrics of absolute and relative “Core” ROAE. Our Compensation Committee determined that the executive team achieved target-level performance with respect to the AIP’s qualitative metrics, yielding payouts of 50% of the NEOs’ respective target amounts.
2022 AIP Award Values
Each NEO’s target AIP award value was set in his respective employment agreement as a percentage of his base salary as follows, with an opportunity to earn 0% to 200% of the target value:
Named Executive Officer2022
Base Salary
Target Award
Percentage
Minimum AIP
Award for 2022
Performance
Target AIP Award
for 2022
Performance
Maximum AIP
Award for 2022
Performance
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor$  1,000,000100%$  0$  1,000,000$  2,000,000
Marcin Urbaszek$560,00075%$0$420,000$840,000
Stephen Alpart$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Peter Morral$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Steven Plust$600,00075%$0$450,000$900,000
Our Compensation Committee believes these award values appropriately reflect internal pay equity considerations, will motivate achievement of the performance goals described below and are competitive within the marketplace for talent, while the cap of 200% of target helps protect our Company against imprudent risk taking.
2022 AIP Award Structure
The percentage of each NEO’s target award value earned was dependent on achievement of a mix of strategic objectives and financial metrics portrayed below:
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_strategic-pn.gif]
44 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation Committee assigned even weighting to the strategic component and financial component to recognize the value of both qualitative and quantitative measures of corporate performance and to incentivize a range of achievements relevant to our growing company’s long-term success. Detailed information about these performance goals and 2022 results follows.
AIP awards for 2023 will be earned based 50% on achievement of the strategic objectives used for the 2022 awards, 25% based on achievement of “run-rate” ROAE targets and 25% based on achievement of change in book value per share targets. Details of these performance metrics and the 2023 awards’ structure will be included in our 2024 proxy statement.
Strategic Component of 2022 AIP Awards – Goals and Results
Our Compensation Committee established specific assessment factors for each of the strategic objectives in the AIP awards for 2022, as follows:
ObjectivePercentage of
Strategic
Component
Summary of Assessment Factors
Balance sheet management30%

Create a diversified and stable funding profile

Maintain appropriate balance sheet leverage

Actively manage corporate liquidity and comply with financial covenants

Grow equity capital to achieve economies of scale, larger market presence and increasing liquidity for stockholders
Risk management30%

Use a comprehensive risk management framework to mitigate various risks, including credit risk, financing and liquidity risk, internal control and operational risk, and IT infrastructure and cybersecurity risk

Assess business counterparties
Stockholder/investor focus20%

Generate detailed, transparent and accurate public company disclosures

Engage equity and debt investors through a robust investor relations program

Attend various equity and fixed income industry conferences and execute marketing efforts
Enhancing franchise value20%

Enhance the Company’s brand and presence in the CRE market to further growth opportunities

Maintain a first-class team with highly skilled and experienced professionals with broad CRE lending relationships

Expand the Company’s reputation in the market as a fair and reliable business counterparty
The NEOs are evaluated collectively with respect to their performance against these objectives. To the extent that achievement of any of these qualitative metrics exceeded the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion under the AIP to apply an aggregate multiplier of between one and two based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric above target. To the extent that achievement of any of these qualitative metrics fell below the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion under the AIP to apply an aggregate multiplier of between zero and one based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric below target.
At the conclusion of the one-year performance period, our Compensation Committee conducted a thorough assessment of our executive team’s performance against the factors set forth above. The committee
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 45

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
acknowledged the uncertain and challenging market conditions that prevailed during 2022 and focused on whether the objectives that will position our Company for long-term success had been achieved. The committee’s performance assessment for the 2022 AIP’s strategic factors is summarized below:
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC FACTORS
Balance Sheet Management
(30% of AIP Strategic Component)

Despite the challenging capital markets environment, proactively managed the balance sheet and originated over $465 million of new loans and realized over $800 million of loan repayments and obligations

Strategically raised an additional $87 million of preferred equity, further strengthening the balance sheet, diversifying funding sources and expanding our permanent capital base

Closed two new financing facilities totaling $250 million in borrowing capacity, which allowed us to fund non-performing loans on a non-mark-to-market basis and opened avenues to finance the business in a challenging market environment

Successfully refinanced two de-leveraged funding vehicles, releasing $180 million of capital, which allowed for the repayment of the remainder of the high-cost term loan and further strengthened our liquidity

Actively increased liquidity over the course of the year and redeemed the $144 million principal amount of convertible notes that matured in December 2022 without accessing the capital markets

Extended the maturities of several bank facilities and renegotiated certain terms, as these lenders continued to support our platform

Continued to comply with financial covenants and actively managed the balance sheet in the context of ongoing market uncertainty and volatility
Risk Management
(30% of AIP Strategic Component)

Actively managed liquidity and funding sources, and carried the appropriate amount of cash to fund operations in the near-to-medium term

Maintained an active dialogue with financing counterparties to ensure that they have up-to-date information about loan performance

Actively managed the portfolio and collaboratively worked with borrowers to help them navigate any disruptions at their properties due to market dislocations

Successfully resolved two non-accrual loans

Realized $1.0 billion of loan repayments, principal paydowns, amortization and two loan sales

Constructively worked with borrowers on loan modifications in response to the effects of the Federal Reserve’s actions, rising interest rates and reduced liquidity in capital markets

Given the evolving market environment, increased selectivity in the origination process and picked the best investments that meet desired risk and return criteria

Actively maintained and enhanced internal controls and operations processes to ensure accurate financial reporting that meets all regulatory requirements

Maintained and enhanced a secure IT environment, including updated cybersecurity policies and procedures and regular cybersecurity risk assessments and testing
(continued)
46 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC FACTORS, cont’d
Stockholder/
Investor Focus
(20% of AIP Strategic Component)

Proactively engaged with investors by conducting non-deal roadshows, carrying out specific transaction marketing, engaging in targeted investor outreach, holding one-on-one meetings, and attending real estate lending industry and equity/fixed income investor conferences

Initiated dialogues with many of our “index-oriented” investors focused on corporate governance and ESG topics

Significantly expanded proxy disclosure, aimed at improving communication related to executive compensation and other governance topics

Further improved and expanded the financial disclosures in our quarterly SEC filings with the goal of providing a more informed view of the business

Rebuilt our corporate website with the goal of expanding the discussion of the business and highlighting ESG efforts and initiatives

Maintained an active dialogue with research analysts to help further expand their knowledge and understanding of our Company and business strategy

Further expanded our institutional equity investor base by successfully executing an $87 million additional preferred equity offering
Enhancing Franchise Value
(20% of AIP Strategic Component)

Continued to broaden our lending platform brand and presence in the CRE lending markets through loan originations during the first half of the year, and maintained an active, constructive dialogue with borrowers and other industry participants in the second half of the year, despite a significant decrease in transaction volumes across the real estate market

Participated in and presented on panels at multiple large industry conferences focused on the CRE market

Maintained an active dialogue with our capital providers in the equity and fixed income markets with the goal of developing new and preserving existing relationships and channels to access capital to support future growth of the business

Selectively expanded our highly capable team, both on the loan origination side and in the financial reporting and operations areas

Supported our team by implementing a flexible/hybrid work model, which allows employees to work up to two days a week remotely, and adopting additional health and safety measures within the office environments

Advanced several ESG initiatives through a cross-functional working group, including enhanced business ethics policies and training, an employee satisfaction survey, and implementing an employee volunteering and charitable giving platform with a corporate match

Further solidified the dedicated asset management function responsible for day-to-day credit surveillance of the portfolio, management of the sub-servicer relationships, and additional oversight of securitization
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 47

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Following this review, our Compensation Committee determined that the NEOs had achieved the objectives of the Strategic Component of the 2022 AIP awards at target levels of performance.
Financial Component of 2022 AIP Awards – Goals and Results
The Financial Component of the 2022 AIP awards was split between absolute and relative measures of “Core” ROAE performance, with a heavier weighting on the absolute value. This mix and weighting of absolute and relative measures places a premium on achieving the “Core” ROAE goal established in our Company’s internal financial plan while also providing an incentive to outperform peers that are relevant comparators for corporate performance.
“Core” ROAE is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during the performance period to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the performance period, as measured on each of the first and last day of the period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our Company’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of certain non-cash items and one-time charges that we believe are not indicative of our Company’s overall operating performance. Distributable Earnings is used to calculate this “Core” ratio instead of GAAP earnings as it is a better measure of a commercial mortgage REIT’s run-rate operating performance and is intended to over time serve as a general, though imperfect, proxy for our taxable income. As such, Distributable Earnings is considered a key indicator of our ability to generate sufficient income to pay our dividends, which is the primary focus of income-oriented investors who comprise a meaningful segment of our stockholder base. For additional information, see the Appendix – Definitions and GAAP Reconciliation.
Our Compensation Committee selected “Core” ROAE as the financial metric to be used in the AIP because it is an important valuation metric for commercial mortgage REITs like our Company that reflects efficient use of investors’ capital and management’s sound investment decisions. “Core” ROAE emphasizes the efficient generation of earnings from our Company’s equity capital that can be distributed to our Company’s stockholders as dividends, substantially reflects performance over time and encompasses all aspects of investment activities, including interest income received on loans net of borrowing costs, as well as realized gains and losses on investments, if any.
To measure relative “Core” ROAE performance, our Company’s absolute result is compared to the results of a comparator group of companies that share the following characteristics:

All are mortgage REITs;

All have investment portfolios focused on commercial mortgages;

They constitute our Company’s primary public commercial mortgage REIT competitors for investment;

They have long-term capital and return profiles similar to our Company’s profiles; and

External market conditions generally affect them in ways similar to how our Company is affected.
The comparator group used to measure “Core” ROAE results for the 2022 AIP awards consisted of the following companies:

ACRES Commercial Realty Corp.

Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation

Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

BrightSpire Capital, Inc.

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.

Ladder Capital Corp

TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
48 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation Committee established the following pay-out matrix to determine achievement under the Financial Component of the 2022 AIP awards. The percentage earned is to be linearly interpolated when the level of performance is between Threshold and Target or between Target and Maximum.
[MISSING IMAGE: box_absolute-pn.gif]
Level of
Performance
Absolute “Core”
ROAE
Percentage Earned
Below Threshold
<2.0%
0% of Target
Threshold2.0%25% of Target
Target6.0%100% of Target
Maximum
9.0%
200% of Target
Actual1.8%0% of Target
[MISSING IMAGE: box_relative-pn.gif]
Level of
Performance
Relative “Core” ROAEPercentage Earned
Below Threshold
<25th percentile      
0% of Target
Threshold
25th percentile      
25% of Target
Target
50th percentile      
100% of Target
Maximum
75th percentile      
200% of Target
Actual
<25th percentile
0% of Target
As indicated above, the Company’s actual “Core” ROAE for 2022 was 1.8% (below the threshold level for the absolute measure), which was outside the range of the comparator group companies’ results (i.e., below the threshold level for the relative measure). The total Financial Component of the 2022 AIP awards was achieved at 0% of target, as shown below:
Total Financial
Component
Results
Absolute
Performance
Percentage Earned

(66.7% weighting)
Relative Performance
Percentage Earned

(33.3% weighting)
Total Percentage
Earned
0% of Target0% of Target0% of Target
AIP Award Payouts
The 100% of target earned from the Strategic Component combined with the 0% of target earned from the Financial Component resulted in 2022 AIP payouts equal to 50% of each NEO’s respective target award, as shown below:
2022 AIP
Award
Payouts
Strategic
Component
Percentage
Earned

(50% weighting)
Financial
Component
Percentage
Earned

(50% weighting)
Total Award
Percentage
Earned
100% of Target0% of Target50% of Target
The dollar amounts paid to the NEOs for the 2022 AIP awards are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. The payouts were made in the first quarter of 2023.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 49

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
LTIP AWARDS GRANTED IN 2022
Our Company adopted our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which supersedes our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, on June 2, 2022. Since the adoption of our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan, no new awards may be granted our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.
Our Compensation Committee granted the NEOs long-term incentive awards under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan in early 2022 (prior to the adoption of our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan) to reward key drivers of stockholder value and foster a sense of ownership and commitment to our Company’s long-term success. The awards are summarized as follows:
Named Executive OfficerRSU Award Grant
Date Value
PSU Award Grant
Date Value
Total 2022 LTIP Award
Grant Date Value
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor$  1,125,000$  1,125,000$  2,250,000
Marcin Urbaszek$485,000$485,000$970,000
Stephen Alpart$600,000$600,000$1,200,000
Peter Morral$600,000$600,000$1,200,000
Steven Plust$600,000$600,000$1,200,000
Factors influencing the size of each executive’s LTIP award include job responsibilities and performance, retention considerations, internal pay equity within the executive group, and market competitiveness. The grant date value of the NEOs’ LTIP awards granted in 2022 remained unchanged from the 2021 grants except that Mr. Urbaszek’s award was increased from a total grant date value of $670,000 in 2021 to $970,000 in 2022. This increase was driven by internal pay equity considerations and the breadth of Mr. Urbaszek’s responsibilities, including his roles as Chief Financial Officer and Head of Investor Relations.
The even split of the NEOs’ LTIP target value between performance-based and time-based awards is designed to motivate achievement of financial objectives while encouraging retention and stock ownership. The ultimate value of both the PSUs and the RSUs is dependent on our long-term success as reflected in the price of our Company’s common stock.
The treatment of the awards upon the NEO’s termination of employment in connection with death, disability, retirement or a change of control of our Company is described in detail in “Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” later in this proxy statement. The award agreements provide for “double trigger” vesting, meaning that vesting is not accelerated upon a change of control unless the change of control is accompanied by a qualifying termination of employment.
PSU Awards
The PSU awards granted to the NEOs in early 2022 have a three-year performance period of January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024. All the PSUs that have been earned through satisfaction of the applicable performance metrics will vest at the conclusion of the performance period on a one-for-one basis of one share of common stock per PSU, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
The percentage of the target number of PSUs granted that will be earned is dependent on our Company’s absolute and relative “Core” ROAE performance during the three-year period. The absolute and relative measures are evenly weighted to align the NEOs’ focus on execution of our Company’s long-term plan while accounting for independent economic and real estate market forces. Actual units earned will be between 0% and 200% of target levels.
The significance and calculation of “Core” ROAE are described above under “2022 AIP Awards.” We believe that ROAE is an important metric for our Company and its stockholders, and our Compensation Committee used “Core” ROAE to measure corporate performance on both an annual and long-term basis in 2022 awards to align pay and performance. The PSUs granted in early 2023 use absolute and relative “run-rate” ROAE and absolute and relative change in book value per share as performance metrics. Details of these performance metrics and the awards’ structure will be included in our 2024 proxy statement.
50 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The threshold, target and maximum levels of absolute performance are different for the PSUs granted in 2022 than for the 2022 AIP awards to reflect the equity awards’ longer performance period. The “Core” ROAE level used for target absolute performance is intended to be challenging but achievable. Relative “Core” ROAE will be calculated using the same comparator group of companies used in the AIP awards.
The PSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that accrue during the performance period but are paid out upon vesting only with respect to shares that have been earned through satisfaction of the performance metrics. Upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to all outstanding PSUs. No dividend equivalent rights are paid out with respect to shares not earned or PSUs that have terminated before vesting.
Because 2021 was the first year that PSUs were granted, no PSU performance period has been completed and there is no equity award earn-out to report as of December 31, 2022. Management estimated as of December 31, 2022, based on information available at the time, that the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted in early 2021 was that they would vest at 25% of target, and the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted in early 2022 was that they would vest at 62.5% of target. The performance period for the PSUs granted in early 2021 will end on December 31, 2023, and the earn-out will be reported in our 2024 proxy statement.
RSU Awards
The RSUs granted to the NEOs in early 2022 vest ratably over a three-year period – 33% on each of February 16, 2023, and February 16, 2024, and 34% on February 16, 2025 – subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement. The RSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that, upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, pay out with respect to all outstanding RSUs.
BENEFITS
Our NEOs receive the same benefits package available to our other employees, which consists primarily of health and wellness offerings, a 401(k) savings plan with a Company contribution and paid time off.
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Our Compensation Committee believes that ownership of our Company’s common stock by our executive officers directly aligns their interests with those of our other stockholders and helps balance the incentives for risk taking inherent in equity-based awards. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee has adopted the following stock ownership guidelines:
Executive OfficerMinimum Ownership Level
Chief Executive OfficerMarket value of stock held 5x base salary
Other executive officersMarket value of stock held 3x base salary
All restricted shares and unvested RSUs are included in determining whether an executive officer satisfies the applicable minimum ownership level. Shares underlying unvested PSUs are not included. An executive officer is expected to attain the minimum ownership level within five years of appointment. If the minimum amount is not attained by such date – or is not maintained after such date – the officer is expected to retain at least 75% of the shares issued upon settlement of equity awards (net of shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations) until attaining the ownership level.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 51

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
As of December 31, 2022, none of our NEOs held the minimum ownership level based on market value when measured with the year-end closing stock price (on December 30, 2022) of $5.36 per share. In comparison, all NEOs had held the minimum ownership level at the end of 2021, which was measured using the year-end closing stock price (on December 31, 2021) of $11.71 per share. The difference between the ownership levels for the two years is solely due to fluctuations in our stock price, as no NEO sold any shares during 2022. Consequently, all NEOs have been deemed to meet the guidelines’ current retention expectation.
PROHIBITION AGAINST HEDGING AND PLEDGING
Our Board has adopted, as part of our Insider Trading Policy, prohibitions against our officers, directors and employees engaging in transactions designed to profit from fluctuations in the price of our securities, such as short sales or purchasing our securities on margin. In addition, such persons are prohibited from purchasing or selling puts or calls or other derivative securities on our securities, pledging our securities as collateral for a loan, or entering into hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to our securities.
FORFEITURE AND CLAWBACK POLICY
Both our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan and 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which became effective on June 2, 2022, include forfeiture and clawback provisions that are triggered by a restatement of incorrect financial results. In the case of a restatement, our Compensation Committee will review all cash and equity awards (whether granted under either of those plans or otherwise) held by executive officers that were earned based on performance or vested during the course of the financial period subject to such restatement or were granted during or within one year following such financial period.
If any award would have been lower or would not have vested, been earned or been granted based on the restated financial results, our Compensation Committee may (i) cancel the award, in whole or in part, whether or not vested, earned or payable or (ii) require the executive officer to repay to our Company an amount equal to all or any portion of the value of any gains from the grant, vesting or payment of the award that would not have been realized had the restatement not occurred. Our Compensation Committee will determine, in its sole discretion, whether such a forfeiture or clawback is appropriate, and any forfeiture or clawback will be undertaken to the extent permitted by governing law.
We expect to update our forfeiture and clawback policy as may be necessary to comply with New York Stock Exchange listing standards to be issued in connection with the SEC rules promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or Dodd-Frank Act.
COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT
Our Compensation Committee reviewed our Company’s compensation programs and plans for both executive officers and other employees in early 2023 to assess whether those programs and plans create incentives for risk-taking behavior that could damage our Company and its stockholders. Following this assessment, our Compensation Committee determined that the risks arising from our Company’s compensation programs and plans for executive officers and other employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.
52 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
When making this determination, our Compensation Committee specifically considered the following features of our executive compensation program:
Risk-Mitigating Features of Executive Compensation Program
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_do-pn.gif]

Earnout of performance-based equity (PSU) and annual cash (AIP) awards is capped at
200% of target

Performance-based awards have a sliding scale earnout structure, not an all-or-nothing
structure

A significant percentage of the executives’ total direct compensation is paid as equity
with three-year vesting

PSUs have a three-year performance period

Our forfeiture and clawback policy allows recoupment of cash or equity awards upon a
financial restatement

All officers and employees are prohibited from hedging Company securities through
our Insider Trading Policy

Executive stock ownership levels and retention requirements are governed by stock
ownership guidelines
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 53

Compensation Committee Report
Compensation Committee Report
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management.
Based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board:
Hope B. Woodhouse (Chair)
Tanuja M. Dehne
W. Reid Sanders
54 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the cash and equity compensation awarded to or earned by our NEOs for services rendered to us during the fiscal years presented:
Name and Principal
Position
YearSalary
($)
Bonus(1)
($)
Stock
Awards
(2)
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
($)
All Other
Compensation
(4)
($)
Total(5)
($)
John (“Jack”) A.
Taylor

President and
Chief Executive
Officer
20221,000,0002,249,979500,0009,1503,759,129
20211,000,0002,718,4541,000,0008,7004,727,154
20201,000,0002,199,9953,199,995
Marcin Urbaszek
Vice President,
Chief Financial
Officer and
Treasurer
2022560,000969,980210,0009,1501,749,130
2021560,000809,487420,0008,7001,798,187
2020420,000809,9901,229,990
Stephen Alpart
Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
2022600,0001,199,984225,0009,1502,034,134
2021600,0001,449,848450,0008,7002,508,548
2020450,0001,349,9921,779,992
Peter Morral
Vice President and Chief Development Officer
2022600,0001,199,984225,0009,1502,034,134
2021600,0001,449,848450,0008,7002,508,548
2020450,0001,449,9881,899,988
Steven Plust
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
2022600,0001,199,984225,0009,1502,034,134
2021600,0001,449,848450,0008,7002,508,548
2020450,0001,349,9921,844,407
(1)
The amounts in this column for 2020 represent one-time cash awards paid in connection with the Internalization process, as discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
(2)
The amounts in this column are calculated based on the number of restricted stock awards, RSUs and PSUs awarded and the fair market value of our common stock on the date the award was made in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K for assumptions used to calculate our stock awards.
The 2022 amounts in this table reflect the fair market value of each NEO’s RSUs plus the target payout for the PSUs on the grant date. As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the actual number of PSUs earned will be determined after a three-year performance period beginning on January 1, 2022, and ending on December 31, 2024. Depending on our Company’s performance during this time with respect to the awards’ metrics, 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted to the NEOs can be earned. The grant date fair value of RSUs plus the grant date fair value of the PSUs assuming maximum potential payout amounts are as follow: (a) Mr. Taylor, $3,374,968; (b) Mr. Urbaszek, $1,454,970; (c) Mr. Alpart, $1,799,976; (d) Mr. Morral, $1,799,976; and (e) Mr. Plust, $1,799,976.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 55

Executive Compensation
(3)
The amounts in this column for 2022 represent payments made to the NEOs under the AIP in early 2023 based on performance during 2022. The AIP and these awards are described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
(4)
The amounts in this column for 2022 represent Company contributions into each NEO’s 401(k) savings plan for 2022 service.
(5)
Any cash compensation paid to our NEOs by our Former Manager during 2020 is not included in this Summary Compensation Table.
56 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2022
The following table shows the cash incentive awards made under our AIP, and the PSU and RSU awards made under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, to our NEOs during 2022.
NameAward
Type
Grant
Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(3)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(5)
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
(6)
($)
Threshold
($)
(2)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
(4)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
John (“Jack”) A. TaylorAIP125,0001,000,0002,000,000
PSU2/16/202223,75495,016190,0321,124,989
RSU2/16/202295,0161,124,989
Marcin UrbaszekAIP52,500420,000840,000
PSU2/16/202210,24140,96281,924484,990
RSU2/16/202240,962484,990
Stephen AlpartAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU2/16/202212,66950,675101,350599,992
RSU2/16/202250,675599,992
Peter MorralAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU2/16/202212,66950,675101,350599,992
RSU2/16/202250,675599,992
Steven PlustAIP56,250450,000900,000
PSU2/16/202212,66950,675101,350599,992
RSU2/16/202250,675599,992
(1)
These columns show the potential payments for each of the NEOs under our AIP for 2022 performance. Actual payment amounts are determined in accordance with the performance metrics and calculation formula described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amounts paid to the NEOs in early 2023 for 2022 performance are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)
As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” 50% of the AIP was subject to quantitative metrics – absolute “Core” ROAE and relative “Core” ROAE – which have threshold performance levels, and 50% was subject to qualitative metrics, which do not have threshold performance levels. To the extent that achievement of any of the qualitative metrics exceeded the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion to apply an aggregate multiplier of between one and two based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric above target. To the extent that achievement of any of the qualitative metrics fell below the target level of performance, our Compensation Committee had the discretion to apply an aggregate multiplier of between zero and one based on the actual achievement of the qualitative metric below target. The amounts in this column reflect threshold performance for each of the quantitative metrics and a determination of zero with respect to the qualitative metrics. Performance below the threshold levels for the quantitative metrics, when paired with a determination of zero with respect to the qualitative metrics, would yield a payout of $0.
(3)
These columns show the potential number of PSUs that could be earned by each of the NEOs during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024. As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted to the NEOs can be earned depending on our Company’s performance during this period with respect to the awards’ metrics.
Any PSUs earned during the performance period will vest at the conclusion of the performance period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 57

Executive Compensation
respective award agreement. The PSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that accrue during the performance period but are paid out upon vesting only with respect to shares that have been earned through satisfaction of the performance metrics. Upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to all outstanding PSUs. No dividend equivalent rights are paid out with respect to shares not earned or PSUs that have terminated before vesting.
(4)
The amounts in this column reflect performance equal to threshold levels with respect to both absolute “Core” ROAE and relative “Core” ROAE. Performance below those levels would yield an earn-out of zero PSUs.
(5)
The RSUs reflected in this column vest ratably over a three-year period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement. The RSU awards are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that, upon the payment of any dividend (other than non-cash extraordinary dividends) by our Company to its common stockholders, pay out with respect to all outstanding RSUs.
(6)
The values in this column were calculated by multiplying the number of units granted (in the case of PSUs, the target number was used) by the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the grant date.
58 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning unvested restricted stock, RSU and PSU awards held by each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2022.
Stock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of Shares or
Units of Stock that
Have Not Vested
(#)
Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock that Have Not
Vested
(1)
($)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number
of Unearned Units
That Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
Value or Payout
Value of Unearned
Units That Have Not
Vested
(1)
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor2/16/202295,016(2)509,286
2/16/202295,016(3)509,286
1/29/2021112,612(4)603,600
1/29/202175,075(5)402,402
12/31/2020100,100(6)536,536
1/29/202021,657(7)116,082
Marcin Urbaszek2/16/202240,962(2)219,556
2/16/202240,962(3)219,556
1/29/202133,533(4)179,737
1/29/202122,356(5)119,828
12/31/202056,056(6)300,460
1/29/20204,512(7)24,184
Stephen Alpart2/16/202250,675(2)271,618
2/16/202250,675(3)271,618
1/29/202160,060(4)321,922
1/29/202140,040(5)214,614
12/31/202060,060(6)321,922
1/29/202013,536(7)72,553
Peter Morral2/16/202250,675(2)271,618
2/16/202250,675(3)271,618
1/29/202160,060(4)321,922
1/29/202140,040(5)214,614
12/31/202060,060(6)321,922
1/29/202015,340(7)82,222
Steven Plust2/16/202250,675(2)271,618
2/16/202250,675(3)271,618
1/29/202160,060(4)321,922
1/29/202140,040(5)214,614
12/31/202060,060(6)321,922
1/29/202013,536(7)72,553
(1)
The values in this column are based on the $5.36 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(2)
The number of PSUs listed is the target number that can be earned during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024. The actual number of PSUs earned will be 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted, depending on our Company’s performance during the
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 59

Executive Compensation
performance period with respect to the awards’ metrics. Any PSUs earned during the performance period will vest at the conclusion of the performance period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(3)
These RSUs vest at the rate of 33% on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date and 34% on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(4)
The number of PSUs listed is the target number that can be earned during the three-year performance period of January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023. The actual number of PSUs earned will be 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted, depending on our Company’s performance during the performance period with respect to the awards’ metrics. Any PSUs earned during the performance period will vest at the conclusion of the performance period, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(5)
These RSUs vest at the rate of 33% on January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023, and 34% on January 1, 2024, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(6)
These RSUs will vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant date, or December 31, 2025, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
(7)
These shares of restricted stock vest at the rate of 33% on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date and 34% on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and other terms and conditions contained in the respective award agreement.
60 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
Stock Vested in 2022
The following table sets forth information concerning the shares of restricted stock and RSUs held by our NEOs that vested during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
(1)
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor79,909945,480
Marcin Urbaszek20,005236,289
Stephen Alpart46,502550,629
Peter Morral47,012556,719
Steven Plust46,502550,629
(1)
The values in this column are based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the applicable vesting date or, if the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the vesting date.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Although certain equity awards granted to the NEOs have features that could be deemed subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, we do not currently maintain a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides for deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified for the NEOs.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change
in Control
Our NEOs’ employment agreements provide for payment of various compensation and benefits to our NEOs upon certain types of termination of employment, including the following:
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control) – if, at any time other than during the three-month period immediately prior to (or otherwise in connection with or in anticipation of) a “Change of Control” ​(as defined below) or during the twenty-four (24) month period immediately following a Change of Control, or a Change-in-Control Period, (i) we terminate the employment of an NEO involuntarily without “Cause” ​(as defined below) or because of death or disability or (ii) an NEO resigns for “Good Reason” ​(as defined below), the NEO will generally be entitled to the following:

All accrued and unpaid base salary and benefits;

Severance payments equal to 2.0 times for Mr. Taylor, 1.5 times for Messrs. Alpart and Plust and 1.0 times for Messrs. Morral and Urbaszek the sum of the NEO’s then-applicable base salary and target cash bonus, if any, payable in equal installments over twelve months;

To the extent not yet paid, if applicable and earned based on actual performance, the NEO’s prior year’s cash bonus, payable at the same time the prior year’s cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers;

A cash bonus equal to the cash bonus that the NEO would have received for the fiscal year, if any, based on actual performance and prorated for the number of days the NEO was employed by us during that fiscal year, payable at the same time cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers for that fiscal year;

Reimbursement for Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, or COBRA, premiums for the NEO and such executive officer’s eligible dependents for up to eighteen (18) months;
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 61

Executive Compensation

Unvested time-based equity awards will continue to vest as if the NEO had remained employed by us through the applicable vesting date; and

Unvested performance-based equity awards will be prorated for the number of days in the applicable performance period and vest at the end of the applicable performance period based on actual performance;.
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (related to a Change of Control) – if, during a Change-in-Control Period, (i) we terminate the employment of an NEO involuntarily without Cause (as defined below) or because of death or disability or (ii) an NEO resigns for Good Reason (as defined below), the NEO will generally be entitled to the following:

All accrued and unpaid base salary and benefits;

Severance payments equal to 2.5 times for Mr. Taylor, 2.0 times for Messrs. Alpart and Plust and 1.5 times for Messrs. Morral and Urbaszek the sum of the NEO’s then-applicable base salary and target cash bonus, if any, payable in a lump sum on the Release Deadline (as defined below);

To the extent not yet paid, if applicable and earned based on actual performance, the NEO’s prior year’s cash bonus, payable at the same time the prior year’s cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers;

A cash bonus equal to the NEO’s target cash bonus and prorated for the number of days such executive officer was employed by us during that fiscal year, payable within ten (10) days after the Release Deadline;

Reimbursement for COBRA premiums for the NEO and such executive officer’s eligible dependents for up to eighteen (18) months;

Unvested time-based equity awards will immediately vest upon the NEO’s termination of employment; provided, however, in limited circumstances, to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of certain taxes, such awards will continue to vest as if such executive officer had remained employed by us through the applicable vesting date; and

Unvested performance-based equity awards will immediately vest at the target amount upon the NEO’s termination of employment; provided, however, in limited circumstances, if necessary to avoid certain adverse tax consequences, settlement of the awards will occur at the end of the applicable performance period.
Termination upon Death, Disability or Retirement – if an NEO’s employment terminates because of such executive officer’s (i) death, (ii) disability or (iii) “Retirement,” which is defined by the employment agreements as the executive officer’s resignation (other than for Good Reason) after the age of 65 with five years of service with the Company, inclusive of service with our Former Manager, such executive officer will generally be entitled to the following:

All accrued and unpaid base salary and benefits;

To the extent not yet paid, if applicable and earned based on actual performance, the NEO’s prior year’s cash bonus, payable at the same time the prior year’s cash bonuses are paid to other executive officers;

A cash bonus equal to the NEO’s target cash bonus and prorated for the number of days such executive officer was employed by us during that fiscal year, payable within ten days after the Release Deadline (as defined below);

For termination because of disability only, reimbursement for COBRA premiums for the NEO and such executive officer’s eligible dependents for up to eighteen (18) months; and

Unvested equity awards will receive the same treatment that unvested equity awards do for terminations without Cause or resignations for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control), as described above; provided, however, if the termination is the result of the NEO’s retirement during a Change-in-Control Period, unvested equity awards will receive the same treatment that unvested equity awards do for terminations without Cause or resignations for Good Reason (related to a Change of Control), as described above, except that the number of performance-based equity awards vesting
62 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
will be prorated based on the number of days such executive officer was employed by us during the applicable performance period.
Each NEO’s receipt of severance payments and other post-termination benefits is subject to, among other conditions, such executive officer executing a separation agreement and release of claims that is effective no later than sixty (60) days following the termination of such executive officer’s employment, or the Release Deadline, and such executive officer’s continued compliance with the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained in such executive officer’s Employment Agreement. For more information regarding the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions in our NEOs’ employment agreements, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – How Executive Compensation Is Determined – Employment Agreements” above.
As used in our NEOs’ employment agreements:

“Cause” generally includes an NEO’s: (i) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties and responsibilities to our Company; (ii) commission of any act of fraud, theft, embezzlement or any other willful misconduct that injures our Company; (iii) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, any felony or a lesser crime involving moral turpitude; (iv) willful violation of any material written policy of our Company; (v) alcohol abuse or other substance abuse that materially impairs his ability to perform his obligations; (vi) unauthorized and willful use or disclosure of any proprietary information or trade secrets of our Company or other parties; and (vii) material and willful breach of any restrictive covenants to our Company;

“Change of Control” has the same definition as is given to such term in our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, provided that a management-led buyout is not considered a Change of Control;

“Good Reason” with respect to an NEO generally includes: (i) a change in such executive officer’s title or reporting relationship or a material reduction in such executive officer’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (ii) a reduction in such executive officer’s base salary or target cash bonus of 10% or more; (iii) a material change in the geographic location of such executive officer’s primary work location; and (iv) a material breach by our Company of a material provision of such executive officer’s employment agreement.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 63

Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth estimates of the potential benefits to our NEOs in connection with certain termination and change in control events, assuming such events occurred on December 31, 2022. The actual payments due upon the occurrence of such events could materially differ from the estimates provided in the table if such events occur on a different date.
Name and
Form of Benefit
Termination without
Cause or Resignation for
Good Reason (not
related to a Change of
Control)
($)
Termination without
Cause or Resignation for
Good Reason (related to
a Change of Control)
($)
Death
($)
Disability
($)
Retirement(1)
($)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor
Severance4,000,0005,000,000
Cash Bonus(2)
500,0001,000,0001,000,0001,000,0001,000,000
Equity2,130,746(3)2,677,191(4)2,130,746(3)2,130,746(3)2,130,746(3)
Other Benefits64,418(5)64,418(5)64,418(5)
Totals6,695,1648,741,6093,130,7463,195,1643,130,746
Marcin Urbaszek
Severance980,0001,470,000
Cash Bonus(2)
210,000420,000420,000420,000420,000
Equity855,109(3)1,063,322(4)855,109(3)855,109(3)855,109(3)
Other Benefits64,418(5)64,418(5)64,418(5)
Totals2,109,5273,017,7401,275,1091,339,5271,275,109
Stephen Alpart
Severance1,575,0002,100,000
Cash Bonus(2)
225,000450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity1,182,809(3)1,474,247(4)1,182,809(3)1,182,809(3)1,182,809(3)
Other Benefits64,418(5)64,418(5)64,418(5)
Totals3,047,2274,088,6651,632,8091,697,2271,632,809
Peter Morral
Severance1,050,0001,575,000
Cash Bonus(2)
225,000450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity1,192,479(3)1,483,916(4)1,192,479(3)1,192,479(3)1,192,479(3)
Other Benefits78,665(5)78,665(5)78,665(5)
Totals2,546,1443,587,5811,642,4791,721,1441,642,479
Steven Plust
Severance1,575,0002,100,000
Cash Bonus(2)
225,000450,000450,000450,000450,000
Equity1,182,809(3)1,474,247(4)1,182,809(3)1,182,809(3)1,182,809(3)
Other Benefits64,418(5)64,418(5)64,418(5)
Totals3,047,2274,088,6651,632,8091,697,2271,632,809
(1)
As of December 31, 2022, Mr. Taylor was the only NEO who was Retirement eligible, but we have reflected the amounts that would have been paid upon Retirement on December 31, 2022, had all NEOs been so eligible.
(2)
Cash bonus amounts reflect pro-rated AIP payments for actual 2022 performance for a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control), and pro-rated AIP payments for target performance for a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason related to a Change of Control, death, disability or Retirement.
(3)
While settlement of outstanding equity awards is not accelerated upon a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (not related to a Change of Control), death, disability or Retirement, outstanding equity awards would not be forfeited but would instead continue to vest without regard to continued service and settle on the original schedule. Therefore, the value of such awards has been included in this table for such events. Unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested RSUs would
64 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
continue to vest as though the NEO had remained employed through the applicable vesting period, and unvested PSUs would be prorated for the NEO’s partial service during the performance period. In these circumstances, the PSUs would vest at the end of the performance period at levels reflecting actual performance. However, for purposes of this table, the value of the outstanding PSU awards is reflected at target levels of performance. The value for all awards is based on the $5.36 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(4)
Comprised of outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock, unvested RSUs and unvested PSUs held by the NEO as of December 31, 2022, that would have vested in full upon a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (related to a Change of Control). The PSUs would vest at target levels in this circumstance. The value for all awards is based on the $5.36 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of the fiscal year.
(5)
Assumes reimbursement of COBRA premiums for eighteen (18) months after the termination of the NEO’s employment.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 65

Executive Compensation
Pay Versus Performance
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our executive officers and certain corporate performance metrics, in accordance with SEC regulations, during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021, and 2022. Please note that the compensation information presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table below is different from the compensation information presented in the Summary Compensation Table largely due to the different methodologies applied to calculate equity award information.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
(1)
($)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
(2)
($)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
(3)
($)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs
(4)
($)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net Income
(Loss) (in
thousands)
(7)
($)
“Core”
ROAE
(8)
Year
Total
Shareholder
Return
(5)
($)
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
(6)
($)
20223,759,129216,8871,962,883168,5823869(40,825)1.8%
20214,727,1545,202,8642,330,9582,600,747749168,3535.9%
20203,199,9951,921,6171,682,4911,116,4625878(40,439)6.7%
(1)
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO – The amounts in this column are the amounts of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Taylor, our Chief Executive Officer, for the covered years. Any cash compensation paid to Mr. Taylor by our Former Manager during 2020 is not included in the reported amount.
(2)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO – The amounts in the following table represent deductions from and additions to the equity award values for Mr. Taylor for the purposes of computing compensation actually paid amounts appearing in this column of the Pay Versus Performance Table:
YearSummary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
($)
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
Year-End Fair
Value of
Outstanding
Equity Awards
Granted During the
Year
(a)
($)
Change in Fair
Value as of
Year-End of Any
Prior Year
Equity Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End
(a)
($)
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date of
Equity Awards
Granted in Prior
Years that
Vested During
the Year
(a)
($)
Value of Dividends
and Dividend
Equivalent Rights
Paid on Unvested
Equity Awards
During the Year
(b)
($)
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO
($)
20223,759,129(2,249,979)827,589(2,417,670)9,746288,071216,887
20214,727,154(2,718,454)2,637,373282,302(34,647)309,1365,202,864
20203,199,995(2,199,995)1,649,049(508,971)(296,731)78,2691,921,617
(a)
Equity fair value calculations reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table were made using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the relevant date (or, if the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the relevant date).
For PSUs, the probable outcome of those awards’ performance conditions as of the relevant date was used to calculate fair value. Target-level performance was assumed on the grant date. As of December 31, 2021, management estimated that the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted in early 2021 was that they would vest at 100% of target, based on information available at the time. As of December 31, 2022, management estimated that the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted in early 2021 was that they would vest at 25% of target, and the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted In early 2022 was that they would vest at 62.5% of
66 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
target, in both cases based on information available at the time. No PSUs were granted in or outstanding during 2020.
(b)
Represents dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards and dividend equivalent rights paid with respect to unvested RSUs during the covered fiscal year.
(3)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs – The amounts in this column are the average amounts of compensation reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our NEOs other than Mr. Taylor for the covered years. For all covered years, our NEOs other than Mr. Taylor were Mr. Urbaszek, Mr. Alpart, Mr. Morral and Mr. Plust. Any cash compensation paid to our NEOs by our Former Manager during 2020 is not included in the reported amount.
(4)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs – The amounts in the following table represent deductions from and additions to the equity award values for our NEOs other than Mr. Taylor for the purposes of computing average amounts of compensation actually paid appearing in this column of the Pay Versus Performance Table:
YearAverage
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value of Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
Average Year-
End Fair Value
of Outstanding
Equity Awards
Granted
During the
Year
(a)
($)
Average
Change in Fair
Value as of
Year-End of Any
Prior Year
Equity Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End
(a)
($)
Average
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date of
Equity Awards
Granted in Prior
Years that
Vested During
the Year
(a)
($)
Average Value of
Dividends and
Dividend
Equivalent Rights
Paid on Unvested
Equity Awards
During the Year
(b)
($)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
20221,962,883(1,142,483)420,229(1,229,748)5,105152,595168,582
20212,330,958(1,289,758)1,251,290159,936(16,999)165,3212,600,747
20201,682,491(1,239,991)941,565(244,193)(58,501)35,0911,116,462
(a)
Equity fair value calculations reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table were made using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the relevant date (or, if the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the relevant date).
For PSUs, the probable outcome of those awards’ performance conditions as of the relevant date was used to calculate fair value. Target-level performance was assumed on the grant date. As of December 31, 2021, management estimated that the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted in early 2021 was that they would vest at 100% of target, based on information available at the time. As of December 31, 2022, management estimated that the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted in early 2021 was that they would vest at 25% of target, and the probable outcome of the outstanding PSUs granted In early 2022 was that they would vest at 62.5% of target, in both cases based on information available at the time. No PSUs were granted in or outstanding during 2020.
(b)
Represents dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards and dividend equivalent rights paid with respect to unvested RSUs during the covered fiscal year.
(5)
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) – The amounts in this column represent cumulative total return on our Company’s common stock at the end of each covered year, assuming $100 invested on December 31, 2019, with quarterly investment of dividends before consideration of income taxes and without the payment of any commissions.
(6)
Peer Group TSR – The amounts in this column represent cumulative total return on the stocks included in the Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index (which is the index we reference in the “Performance Graph” appearing in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K) at the end of each covered year, assuming $100 invested on December 31, 2019, with quarterly investment of dividends before consideration of income taxes and without the payment of any commissions.
(7)
Net Income (Loss) – The amounts in this column reflect the amount of net income (loss) reported in our Company’s audited financial statements for the covered years.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 67

Executive Compensation
(8)
Core” ROAE – The amounts in this column represent “Core” ROAE for the covered years, which is calculated as the ratio of (i) our Company’s Distributable Earnings generated during a period to (ii) our Company’s average common stockholders’ equity during the same period, as measured on each of the first and last day of such period. For these purposes, Distributable Earnings are as reported in our Company’s publicly filed financial reports, excluding the effects of certain non-cash items and one-time charges that we believe are not indicative of our Company’s overall operating performance.
In addition to financial results for these measures that are reported in accordance with GAAP, we report certain measures on a non-GAAP basis. These measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP, and our financial measures may differ from the non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. For additional information, see the Appendix – Definitions and GAAP Reconciliation.
ANALYSIS OF THE PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
As described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, our executive compensation program changed dramatically in 2021, when we first become an internally managed company. In 2020 and earlier, we did not report cash compensation that had been paid to our NEOs by our Former Manager, and we did not grant performance-based equity. A significant portion of the NEOs’ total compensation opportunity in 2021 and 2022 was performance based through the AIP cash awards and PSU equity awards. The evolution of our executive compensation program over the three-year period reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table complicates some year-over-year comparisons.
We are providing the following information analyzing the relationship among items reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. Please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information about our Compensation Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy and the ways in which the committee structures our NEOs’ compensation opportunities to align with corporate performance.
Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative TSR
The amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Taylor and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the other NEOs are directionally aligned with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three years covered by the Pay versus Performance Table. Over that period, the compensation actually paid to Mr. Taylor decreased by 89% and the average compensation actually paid to the other NEOs decreased by 85%, while our Company’s cumulative TSR decreased by 34%. This directional alignment reflects the significant portion of the compensation actually paid to the NEOs that consisted of equity awards for all covered years.
Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income (Loss)
The amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Taylor and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the other NEOs are not aligned with net income (loss) results over the three years covered by the Pay versus Performance Table. Over that period, the compensation actually paid to Mr. Taylor decreased by 89% and the average compensation actually paid to the other NEOs decreased by 85%, while our Company’s net income (loss) decreased by only 1%. Net income has not been used as a performance measure in our executive compensation program, and over the three covered years it has not correlated strongly with stock price on the measurement dates used to calculate compensation actually paid to the NEOs.
Compensation Actually Paid and “Core” ROAE
“Core” ROAE is the most significant performance measure used by our Company during the most recently completed fiscal year to link (i) compensation actually paid to our NEOs to (ii) corporate performance. For both 2021 and 2022, PSUs comprised 50% of the equity award value granted to the NEOs, and “Core” ROAE was the performance metric for those awards (weighted 50% on an absolute basis and 50% on a relative basis). In addition, 50% of the NEOs’ AIP awards paid for 2021 and 2022 were based on “Core” ROAE achievement (weighted 66.7% on an absolute basis and 33.3% on a relative basis).
The amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Taylor and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the other NEOs are generally aligned with “Core” ROAE results over the three years covered by the Pay versus Performance Table. Over that period, the compensation actually paid to Mr. Taylor decreased by 89%
68 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Executive Compensation
and the average compensation actually paid to the other NEOs decreased by 85%, while our Company’s “Core” ROAE decreased by 73%. The alignment for 2021 and 2022 in particular reflects the significant role of this performance metric in determining the amount of compensation actually paid to the NEOs during the last two fiscal years.
Cumulative TSR of Our Company and Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group
We believe that the TSR of the Company and of the companies included in the Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index has been affected during the covered years, to varying degrees, by the ongoing negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on macroeconomic conditions and the real estate market fundamentals, as well as the rapid increase in interest rates driven by the aggressive Federal Reserve monetary policy implemented to reduce the high rate of inflation, which has meaningfully contributed to a highly uncertain and volatile capital markets environment. The above factors have impacted various sectors and companies in different ways, including the performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, its capital structure and cost of funds.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
As summarized above in “Analysis of the Pay versus Performance Information – Compensation Actually Paid and ‘Core’ ROAE,” “Core” ROAE is the financial performance measure that has been tied to the NEOs’ long-term and short-term incentive awards for the last two fiscal years. During that time, payout levels under the AIP awards was partially determined by the NEOs’ performance relative to certain strategic objectives as well. Accordingly, the following performance measures were the most important performance measures used by our Company during the most recently completed fiscal year to link (i) compensation actually paid to our NEOs to (ii) corporate performance:

“Core” ROAE

Balance Sheet Management

Risk Management

Stockholder/Investor Focus

Enhancing Franchise Value
Please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for detailed information about the role of these performance metrics in our 2022 executive compensation program.
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the annual total compensation of our median employee and the annual total compensation of our CEO.
As of December 31, 2022, we had 35 employees, all of whom were located in the United States and working for our Company full time. To identify the median employee, we calculated all employees’ total 2022 compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table, using annualized amounts for anyone who was employed by us for only part of the year. The median employee identified for this disclosure received 2022 compensation at the median point of the 2022 compensation received by all non-CEO employees.
Our median employee’s annual total compensation was $318,450 in 2022, and our CEO’s annual total compensation was $3,759,129 in 2022. These amounts were calculated in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. The ratio of these amounts is 1:11.8.
The ratio stated above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable SEC regulations under Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K and is not necessarily comparable to the ratios reported by other companies.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 69

Proposal 2: Approval of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Proposal 2: Approval of Advisory Vote
on Executive Compensation
The SEC adopted rules pursuant to Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act that require public companies to provide stockholders with periodic advisory (nonbinding) votes on executive compensation, also referred to as “say-on-pay” proposals.
We are asking you to vote “FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLVED: That the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company, as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and the related disclosure contained in the proxy statement.
For more information regarding our executive compensation program, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections above.
Because this say-on-pay vote is advisory in nature, it is not binding on us, our Board or our Compensation Committee. However, our Board values our stockholders’ opinion, and our Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of this vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Our Board has determined that our Company will hold an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis. We currently expect to conduct the next advisory vote on executive compensation at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2024.
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_propos2-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this “Say on Pay” advisory proposal. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward performance and align with stockholders’ interests.

“FOR”
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.gif]
70 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment
of Independent Auditor
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, our Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.
In the event stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by our Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
We retained Ernst & Young LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022. The table below presents the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
Audit fees(1)$1,063,000$1,063,000
Audit-related fees$$
Tax fees(2)$235,954$226,281
All other fees$$
Total$1,298,954$1,289,281
(1)
Audit fees pertain to the audit of our annual Consolidated Financial Statements, including review of the interim financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters to underwriters in connection with our registration statements and security offerings, attest services, consents to the incorporation of the Ernst & Young LLP audit report in publicly filed documents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)
Tax fees pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including REIT compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including preparation of tax returns and claims for refund and tax-payment planning services. Tax planning and advice also includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, and tax advice related to specific transactions.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 71

Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy
The services performed by Ernst & Young LLP in 2022 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. This policy requires that all engagement fees and the terms and scope of all audit and non-audit services be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in advance of their formal initiation.
Voting Recommendation
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_propos3-pn.jpg]
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2023.

”FOR”
[MISSING IMAGE: icon_check-pn.gif]
72 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Audit Committee Report
Audit Committee Report
Our Board has appointed an Audit Committee presently composed of independent directors Stephen G. Kasnet, W. Reid Sanders and Hope B. Woodhouse. Mr. Kasnet serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. Each of the directors on our Audit Committee is an independent director under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Kasnet and Ms. Woodhouse satisfies the definition of financial sophistication and is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC.
Our Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight with respect to the preparation, review and audit of our financial statements and the qualifications, independence and performance of our internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in its charter which is available on our website at www.gpmtreit.com. It is not the duty of our Audit Committee to prepare our financial statements or to plan or conduct audits. Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and for developing, maintaining and evaluating our internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our consolidated financial statements and for expressing an opinion as to whether they fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, as appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm.
Our Audit Committee reviews our financial reporting process on behalf of our Board. In performance of its oversight function, our Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, or EY, with respect to our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2022 and related matters. Management advised our Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and our Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and EY. EY presented to and reviewed with our Audit Committee the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, and the SEC. EY also provided to our Audit Committee the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EY’s communications with our Audit Committee concerning its independence, and, in connection therewith, our Audit Committee discussed with EY their views as to its independence. Our Audit Committee also reviewed, among other things, the audit and non-audit services performed by, and the amount of fees paid for such services to, EY. Our Audit Committee meetings regularly include executive sessions with EY without the presence of our management.
In undertaking its oversight function, our Audit Committee relied, without independent verification, on management’s representation that the financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on EY’s representation included in their report on our financial statements. Our Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance or professional opinion as the sufficiency of the external or internal audits or whether our Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, our Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, for filing with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board:
Stephen G. Kasnet (Chair)
W. Reid Sanders
Hope B. Woodhouse
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 73

Other Matters
Other Matters
Meeting Matters
Our Board does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting except items incident to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all matters properly brought before the meeting by our Board or others, the persons named as proxy holders in the accompanying proxy, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in their discretion to the extent permitted by law.
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2024 Annual Meeting
PROPOSALS INCLUDED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT
If a stockholder intends to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the stockholder proposal must be received by the Secretary of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036, on or before December 19, 2023. A proposal must comply with all the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act to be included in our proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting.
We suggest such proposals be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require us to include any stockholder proposal that does not meet all the requirements for such inclusion established by the SEC in effect at that time.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS OR OTHER PROPOSALS
Outside of Rule 14I(e), stockholders may nominate candidates for election to our Board or propose business for consideration at our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders under Maryland law and our Bylaws. Our Bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our Board and the proposal of other business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of our Board or (iii) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the notice required by our Bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in our Bylaws.
Under our Bylaws, notice of such a nomination or proposal of other business must generally be provided to the Secretary not earlier than the 150th day nor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 19, 2023, but not earlier than November 19, 2023. Any such nomination or proposal must include the information required by our Bylaws. Stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.
Annual Report
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder, without charge, upon written request to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036. You also may obtain our Annual Report on Form 10-K on the Internet at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or on our website at www.gpmtreit.com.
74 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to vote on the following matters:
(1)
To elect as directors the six nominees named in this proxy statement;
(2)
To approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers;
(3)
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent auditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023; and
(4)
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Are there any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that are not included in this proxy statement?
We currently are not aware of any business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than as described in this proxy statement. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, your proxy includes discretionary authority on the part of the individuals appointed to vote your shares of common stock or act on those matters according to their best judgment.


Why is the Company holding a virtual annual meeting?
We have elected to conduct our Annual Meeting in a virtual format in order to better facilitate stockholder participation by enabling stockholders to participate fully, and equally, from any location at no cost, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.cost. We believe this approach increases our ability to engage with all stockholders, regardless of size, resources or physical location, and also provides cost savings for the Company. We have designed this virtual format to enhance, rather than constrain, stockholder access, participation and communication. For example, the online format allows stockholders to communicate with us in advance of, and during, the meeting so they can ask any appropriate questions ofto management and our Board.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Our Board has set April 3, 2020,2023, as the record date for the Annual Meeting. This means that the holders of our common stock as of the close of business on that date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereof. On the record date, there were 55,136,88551,526,039 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
A list of the holders of our common stock as of the record date will be available at our principal executive office, during normal business hours for the ten days preceding the Annual Meeting, for examination by any registered holder of common stockholderstock as of the record date for any purpose pertaining to the Annual Meeting. Our principal executive office is located at 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
What are my voting rights?
You are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held by you on the record date on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. There is no cumulative voting.
How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?
The presence, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of shares of our common stock entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum for the
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 75

Frequently Asked Questions
transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Your shares will be counted toward the quorum if you submit a proxy or vote at the Annual Meeting. Shares represented by proxies marked “abstain” and “broker non-votes” also are counted in determining whether a quorum is present.
What is a proxy?
A proxy is your designation of another person to vote shares of our common stock that you own. The person you designate is called a proxy.proxy holder. If you designate someone as your proxy holder in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy holder, you also may direct the proxy holder how to vote your shares. We refer to this as your “proxy vote.” Two executive officers have been designated as proxiesproxy holders for our Annual Meeting. These executive officers areMeeting: John (“Jack”) A. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael J. Karber, our Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary.
What is a proxy statement?
A proxy statement is a document that SEC regulations require us to make available to you by Internet or, if you request, by mail when we ask you to designate proxiesproxy holders to vote your shares of our common stock at a meeting of our stockholders. This proxy statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by regulations of the SEC and rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE.
Why did I receive a notice instead of a full set of proxy materials?
As permitted by SEC rules, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet, which reduces the environmental impact and costs of our Annual Meeting. Accordingly, we mailed a Notice of Availability to beneficial owners and the holders of record of our common stock who have not previously requested a printed set of proxy materials. TheAll holders of common stock will be able to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Availability contains instructions(www.proxyvote.com) or request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. Instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online, as well as instructions on how toover the Internet or request a printed setcopy of our proxy materials.

materials may be found in the Notice of Availability.

Why did I receive more than one notice or printed set of proxy materials?
If you receive more than one Notice of Availability or printed set of proxy materials, it likely means that you hold shares of our common stock in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you should vote once for each control number you receive, as described below under How“How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?”
How can I obtain a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials?
To obtain a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials, you will need your control number, which was provided to you in the Notice of Availability or the proxy card included with your printed set of proxy materials. Once you have your control number, you may request a paper copy or an electronic copy of our proxy materials using any of the following methods: (i) visit www.proxyvote.com and enter your control number when prompted; (ii) call 1-800-579-1639 and enter your control number when prompted; or (iii) send an email requesting electronic delivery of the materials to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.
What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?
If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares.
If your shares of common stock are held in a stock brokerage account, or by a bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote the shares that you beneficially own and you are also invited to attend our Annual Meeting. However, beneficial owners generally cannot vote their shares directly because they are not the stockholder of record; instead, beneficial owners must instruct the broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote their shares using the method described below under How“How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?
76 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Frequently Asked Questions
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We plan to publish the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available within the four business day timeframe, we plan to file a Form 8-K disclosing preliminary voting results within the required four business days, to be followed as soon as practicable by an amendment to the Form 8-K containing final voting results.
How can I vote prior to the Annual Meeting?
Stockholders of Record.If you are a holder of record of our common stock, you may vote your shares or submit a proxy to be voted at the Annual Meeting by one of the following methods:
Vote by Internet: You may authorize your proxy online via the Internet by accessing the website www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided on the Notice of Availability or proxy card. Internet voting facilities will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on June 1, 2020. To vote by Internet, you will need to use the control number listed on your Notice of Availability or proxy card, which was provided to you by our vote tabulator, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.; then follow the additional steps when prompted. These steps have been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly.
Vote by Telephone: You may authorize your proxy by touch-tone telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903. Telephone voting facilities will be available 24 hours a daythe number and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on June 1, 2020. To vote by telephone, you will need to usefollowing the control number listedinstructions provided on the Notice of Availability or proxy card, which was provided to you by our vote tabulator, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.; then follow the additional steps when prompted. The steps have been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly.card.
Vote by Mail: If you request paper copies of the proxy materials to be sent to you by mail, you may authorize your proxy by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the reply envelope included with the paper proxy materials.
Beneficial Owners.If your shares of common stock are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares in street name, you


must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, which is similar to the voting procedures for stockholders of record. Other than ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmauditor for the year ending December 31, 2020, the rules do not permit2023, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee is not permitted to vote your shares of stock on any proposal unless you provide them with specific instructions on how to vote your shares of common stock. You should instruct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares of common stock by following the directions provided by such party. However, if you request the proxy materials by mail after receiving a Notice of Availability from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you will receive a voting instruction form (not a proxy card) to use in directing such party how to vote your shares.
Can I vote my shares during the Annual Meeting?
You may vote your shares during the Annual Meeting until such time as the ChairmanChair declares the polls closed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2020GPMT2023and following the instructions. You will need the 16-digit control number included in your proxy card, voting instructionsinstruction form or Notice of Availability.
How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares and what vote is required for approval of each proposal at the Annual Meeting?
ProposalBoard RecommendationAvailable Voting OptionsVoting Approval StandardEffect of an AbstentionEffect of a Broker Non-Vote
1.Election of six directors
FOR each of the six nominees
FOR;
AGAINST or ABSTAIN, with respect to each nominee
A nominee who receives a majority of all votes cast “for” such nominee is elected as a directorNo EffectNo Effect
2.Advisory vote relating to executive compensationFOR
FOR;
AGAINST or
ABSTAIN
Majority of all votes cast “for” the proposalNo EffectNo Effect
3.Ratification of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firmFOR
FOR;
AGAINST or
ABSTAIN
Majority of all votes cast “for” the proposalNo EffectNot Applicable
If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?
How Do You Hold Your Shares?
How Your Shares will be Voted
if You Specify How to Vote:
How Your Shares will be Voted if
You Do Not Specify How to Vote:
Stockholder of Record (your shares are
registered in your name)
The named proxies will vote your shares
as you direct on the proxy card.
The named proxies will vote as recommended by the Board. In the case of Proposal 1, that means your shares will be voted FOR each director nominee. In the case of Proposals 2 and 3, that means your shares will be voted FOR each proposal.
Beneficial Owner (your shares are held in “street name”)
Your broker, bank, trustee or
other nominee will vote your shares as
you direct them to.
Your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may use its discretion to vote only on items deemed by the NYSE to be “routine,” such as Proposal 3 - Ratification of Auditors. For non-routine items, such as Proposals 1 and 2, your shares will be considered “uninstructed” and result in a broker non-vote.


How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?
Under NYSE rules, brokers, banks, trustees or other nominees who hold shares for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on a limited number of “routine” proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the annual meeting. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee does not receive such voting instructions and does not have the discretion to vote the shares. Pursuant to Maryland law, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the determination of the shares of common stock voting on such matters, but are counted for quorum purposes.
The only “routine” matter to be voted on at our Annual Meeting is Proposal 3 -3: Ratification of Auditors.Appointment of Independent Auditor. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, they may only vote your shares only on Proposal 3.
Your vote is important. We urge you to vote, or to instruct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote, your shares on all matters before the Annual Meeting. For more information regarding the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes on the outcome of a vote, please see How“How does theour Board recommend that I vote my shares and what vote is required for approval of each proposal at the Annual Meeting?” and “If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?” below.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 77

Frequently Asked Questions
How does our Board recommend that I vote my shares and what vote is required for approval of each proposal at the Annual Meeting?
ProposalBoard
Recommendation
Available Voting
Options
Voting Approval
Standard
Effect of an
Abstention
Effect of a Broker
Non-Vote
1
Election of directors
FOR each of the six nomineesFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN, with respect to each nomineeA nominee who receives a majority of all votes cast FOR such nominee is elected as a directorNo EffectNo Effect
2
Approval of advisory vote on executive compensation
FORFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINMajority of all votes cast FOR the proposalNo EffectNo Effect
3
Ratification of appointment of independent auditor
FORFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINMajority of all votes cast FOR the proposalNo EffectNot Applicable
If I submit my proxy, how will my shares of common stock be voted?
How Do You Hold Your Shares?How Your Shares Will Be Voted if You
Specify How to Vote:
How Your Shares Will Be Voted if You
Do Not Specify How to Vote:
Stockholder of Record (your shares are registered in your name)The named proxy holders will vote your shares as you direct on the proxy card.The named proxy holders will vote as recommended by our Board. In the case of Proposal 1, that means your shares will be voted FOR each director nominee. In the case of Proposals 2-3, that means your shares will be voted FOR each proposal.
Beneficial Owner (your shares are held in “street name”)Your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will vote your shares as you direct them to.Your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may use its discretion to vote only on items deemed by the NYSE to be “routine,” such as Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor. For non-routine items, such as Proposals 1-2, your shares will be considered “uninstructed” and result in a broker non-vote.
Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?
You may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised. For holdersIf you are a holder of record of our common stock ifand you voted by mail, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by executing and delivering a timely and valid later-dated proxy, by voting via the Internet during the virtual Annual Meeting or by giving written notice of such revocation to the Secretary. If you voted by Internet or telephone, you may also change your vote with a timely and valid later-dated Internet or telephone vote, as the case may be, or by voting via the Internet during the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless (i) you give proper written notice of revocation to the Secretary before the proxy is exercised or (ii) you vote online during the Annual Meeting.
Notices of revocation of proxies should be sent to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Michael J. Karber, Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
78 / gpmtreit.com/investors

Frequently Asked Questions
Who will count the votes?
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., our independent proxy tabulator, will count the votes.
How can I attend the Annual Meeting?
The Annual Meeting will be conducted virtually via the Internet on Tuesday,Thursday, June 2, 2020.1, 2023. You can attend the meeting by logging in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2020GPMT2023 and following the instructions provided on your Notice of Availability. We recommend that you log in at least ten15 minutes before the Annual Meeting to ensure you are logged inpresent when the meeting starts. Only stockholders who own shares of our common stock as of the record date, April 3, 2020,2023, may submit questions and vote at the Annual Meeting. You may still virtually attend the Annual Meeting if you vote by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting.
If you wish to attend the virtual Annual Meeting at a location provided by us, our legal counsel, StinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, will air the webcast at its offices located at 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 2600, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.One Manhattan West, New York, New York 10001. Please note that no members of management or theour Board will be in attendance at this location, and you will not have the ability to vote your shares during the Annual Meeting from this location. If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting via webcast at StinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP’s offices, you must complete and return the Reservation Request Form found at the end of this proxy statement.
How can I submit questions for the Annual Meeting?
You may submit questions prior to the meeting at www.proxyvote.com or during the meeting by logging in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2020GPMT2023. Questions pertinent to matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, as well as appropriate questions regarding the business and operations of the Company, will be answered during the Annual Meeting, subject to time constraints. In the interests of time and efficiency, we reserve the right to group questions of a similar nature together to facilitate the question and answerquestion-and-answer portion of the meeting. We may not be able to answer all questions submitted in the allotted time.


What is householding?
We may send a single Notice of Availability, as well as other stockholder communications, to any household at which two or more stockholders reside unless we receive other instructions from you. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and printing and postage costs, and conserve natural resources. If your Notice of Availability is being householded and you wish to receive multiple copies of the Notice of Availability, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive a single copy, you may contact:
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Householding Department

51 Mercedes Way

Edgewood, New York 11717
1-866-540-7095
1-866-540-7095
If you participate in householding and would like to receive a separate copy of our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Notice of Availability or proxy statement, please contact Broadridge in the manner described above. Broadridge will deliver the requested documents to you promptly upon receipt of your request.
Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation?
We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies and may make arrangements with brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries to send proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock. We will reimburse these third parties for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors and officers may solicit proxies by telephone, electronic transmission and personally. Our directors and officers will not receive any special compensation for such services. We have retained Morrow SodaliAlliance Advisors, LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut 06902,to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimatedthe Annual Meeting for a fee of $6,500,$15,000, plus out of pocket expenses, to assist us in soliciting proxies.associated costs and expenses.
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / 79

Frequently Asked Questions
Who can help answer my questions?
If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card, please contact our Investor Relations department at our principal executive office:
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

Attention: Investor Relations

3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A

New York, New York 10036

Phone 212-364-5500

Email:
investors@gpmortgagetrust.com


PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board Composition 
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Bylaws, or Bylaws, our directors are elected by stockholders each year at our annual meeting to serve terms expiring at the next annual meeting. Our Bylaws provide that our Board may be comprised of no less than the number of directors required by the Maryland General Corporation Law and no more than 15, with the precise number to be set by our Board. Our Board has set its size at seven and our Board is currently comprised of seven directors. On April 9, 2020, one of our current directors, Thomas E. Siering, notified the Board that he would not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. As a result, Mr. Siering’s current term will expire at the Annual Meeting and the Board approved a reduction in the size of the Board from seven to six effective upon the expiration of Mr. Siering’s current term.
Director Nominations
Action will be taken at the Annual Meeting for the election of six directors, each to hold office until our annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021 and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.
Director Nominees
Following are the names, ages as of April 3, 2020, and existing positions with us of the six director nominees standing for election to our Board at the Annual Meeting:
investors@gpmtreit.com
80 / gpmtreit.com/investors
NameAgeOffice or Position Held
Stephen G. Kasnet74Chairman of the Board
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor64President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Tanuja M. Dehne48Independent Director
Martin A. Kamarck70Independent Director
W. Reid Sanders70Independent Director
Hope B. Woodhouse63Independent Director

Information concerning each of the director nominees is set forth below. Each of the nominees has been recommended for nomination
Appendix – Definitions and GAAP Reconciliation
Appendix – Definitions and GAAP Reconciliation
Debt-to-Equity
Definition: Borrowings outstanding on repurchase facilities, securitized debt obligations, asset-specific financings, convertible senior notes and senior secured term loan facilities, less cash, divided by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and nominated by our Board. Except as described below, there were no arrangements or understandings between any director nominee and any other person pursuant to which they were selected as a director nominee. There are no family relationships between any director nominee and our executive officers. If elected, it is expected that each of the director nominees will be able to serve, but if any such nominee is unable serve or for good cause will not serve, the proxies reserve discretion to vote or refrain from voting for a substitute nominee or nominees.total stockholders’ equity.
We believe that each of the director nominees displays personal and professional integrity; satisfactory levels of education and/or business experience; business acumen; an appropriate level of understanding of our business and its industry and other industries relevant to our business; the ability and willingness to devote adequate time to the work of our Board and its Committees; a fit of skills and personality with those of our other directors that helps build a board that is effective and responsive to the needs of our Company; strategic thinking and a willingness to express ideas; a diversity of experiences, expertise and background; and the ability to represent the interests of our stockholders. The information presented below regarding each director nominee also sets forth specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that he or she should be nominated to stand for election to serve as a director.Distributable Earnings
Stephen G. Kasnet is an independent member and the Chairman of our Board. He has served as a director of the Company since its inception. Mr. Kasnet also serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors, chair of the audit committee and a member of the risk oversight committee of Two Harbors Investment Corp., a hybrid mortgage real estate investment trust (NYSE: TWO), or Two Harbors, since 2009, and served as a director of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp., a real estate investment trust (NYSE: SBY), or Silver Bay, from 2012 to 2017. Mr. Kasnet was also a director of Columbia Laboratories, Inc., a specialty pharmaceuticals company (NASDAQ: CBRX), now Juniper Pharmaceuticals, from August 2004 to June 2015, including as Chairman of the Board from November 2004 to June 2015. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Kasnet was the Chairman of Dartmouth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm. He was also the President and Chief Executive Officer of Raymond Property Company LLC, a real estate company, from 2007 through October 2009. From 2000 to 2006, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Harbor Global Company, Ltd., an asset management, natural resources and real estate investment company, and President of PIOglobal, a RussianDEFINITION AND USE


real estate investment fund. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Kasnet was a director and member of the Executive Committee of The Bradley Real Estate Trust, a real estate investment trust. He was Chairman of Warren Bank, a state commercial bank, from 1990 to 2003. Mr. Kasnet has also held senior management positions with other financial organizations, including Pioneer Group, Inc., First Winthrop Corporation and Winthrop Financial Associates; and Cabot, Cabot and Forbes, a real estate development firm. He served as Chairman of the Board of Rubicon Ltd., an international investor in forestry related industries (NZX: RBC), from 2004 to 2018, as a director of First Ipswich Bancorp, a holding company for The First National Bank of Ipswich which is owned by Brookline Bancorp, Inc., from 2008 to 2020, and as a director of GoodBulk Ltd., a cargo company, from 2017 to 2019. He served as a director and Chairman of Tenon Ltd., a wood products company, from 2016 to 2018. He is also a trustee of the board of the Governor’s Academy, a private coed boarding high school in Byfield, Massachusetts. Mr. Kasnet received a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Kasnet was initially appointed to our Board pursuant to a Director Designation Agreement, between us and Two Harbors, entered into in connectionBeginning with our formation transaction and initial public offering, or our IPO. We believe Mr. Kasnet is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because of his broad business background, extensive experience as a director of public companies and his qualification as an audit committee financial expert.
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor is our President and Chief Executive Officer, a member of our Investment Committee and a member of our Board. Mr. Taylor has been a director and executive officer of the Company since its inception. Mr. Taylor has also served as Global Head of Commercial Real Estate of our company’s external manager, Pine River Capital Management L.P., or our Manager, since November 2014. Prior to joining our Manager, Mr. Taylor served as a Managing Director and Head of Global Real Estate Finance for Prudential Real Estate Investors (now known as PGIM Real Estate Company), a commercial real estate investor, from 2009 to November 2014, where he was also a member of the Global Management Committee and chaired the Global Investment Committee for debt and equity. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Taylor was a partner at Five Mile Capital Partners LLC, an alternative investment and asset management company. Prior to Five Mile Capital Partners, he was co-head of real estate investment banking for the Americas and Europe at UBS Group AG, a Swiss multinational investment bank and financial services company. He previously led the Real Estate Group at PaineWebber & Co., an investment bank and stock brokerage firm, and servedAnnual Report on the firm’s Operating Committee. He was head trader and manager of the CMBS and Principal Commercial Mortgage business for Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., a securities firm. Mr. Taylor was a founding governor of the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association (now the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council) and a member of the President’s Council of the Real Estate Roundtable. Mr. Taylor received a J.D. from Yale Law School, a MSc. in international relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science and a B.A. in philosophy from the University of Illinois. We believe Mr. Taylor is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because of his role as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and his extensive knowledge of, and experience in, the commercial real estate markets in which the Company operates.
Tanuja M. Dehne is an independent member of our Board and has served as a director of the Company since its inception. Ms. Dehne has also served as a director of Advanced Disposal Services, Inc., a solid waste collection company (NYSE: ADSW), since May 2017. Ms. Dehne is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation since September 2019. From December 2012 until May 2017, Ms. Dehne served as an independent director of Silver Bay. From October 2014 through April 2016, she was the Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief of Staff of NRG Energy, Inc., a power generation and retail electricity company (NYSE: NRG). In this role, Ms. Dehne oversaw NRG’s Human Resources, Information Technology, Communications, Corporate Marketing and Sustainability Departments, including the company’s charitable giving program, mergers and acquisition integrations and Big Data Analytics. Prior to these positions, she was the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of NRG since 2011, where she led NRG’s Human Resources department, which handled all HR functions for more than 8,000 employees. From 2004 to 2011, Ms. Dehne served as the Corporate Secretary of NRG, leading corporate governance and corporate transactions, including financing, mergers and acquisitions, public and private securities offerings, securities and stock exchange matters and reporting compliance. Prior to joining NRG, from 1998 to 2004, Ms. Dehne practiced corporate law as a member of the business department of Saul Ewing Arnstien & Lehr, LLP. She received a J.D. from Syracuse University, an M.A. from the University of Pennsylvania in political science and a B.A. from Lafayette College. We believe Ms. Dehne is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because of her knowledge of corporate governance, background serving in various executive management roles and prior public company experience.
Martin A. Kamarck is an independent member of our Board and has served as a director of the Company since its inception. Mr. Kamarck has over 45 years of experience in business and law in both the public and private sectors. He was a partner at Elanus Capital Management, LLC, an alternative asset manager, from 2011 to 2018. Prior to that time, from 1999 to 2005, he was the President of Radian Asset Assurance Inc., the financial guaranty arm of Radian Group Inc., a mortgage insurance company (NYSE: RDN). Prior to Radian, Mr. Kamarck served as Chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States from 1996 to 1997, and Co-Head of Structured Credit and General Counsel at Financial Guarantee Insurance Company, a monoline bond insurer, from 1989 to 1993. Mr. Kamarck began his professional career as an attorney with Morrison & Foerster LLP, at which he ultimately became a Partner and head of the securitization practice. He received a J.D. from Stanford Law School and a B.A. in English Literature from Haverford College. We believe Mr. Kamarck is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because of his extensive background in the financial services industry and experience serving in executive management and leadership roles.


W. Reid Sanders is an independent member of our Board and has served as a director of the Company since its inception. He currently serves as the President of Sanders Properties, Inc., a real estate company, since 2004, and is a director and a member of the audit, compensation and risk oversight committees of Two Harbors since 2009. He also serves as a director and member of the audit and investment committees of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., a real estate investment trust that owns and operates apartment complexes (NYSE: MAA), since 2010. Mr. Sanders is a member of the board and executive and compensation committees of Independent Bank, a bank holding company, since 2004, serves on the investment committee at Cypress Realty, a commercial real estate company, since 2002, and is on the advisory board of SSM Venture Partners III, L.P., a private venture capital firm, since 2000. He was the chairman of the board of Two Rivers Capital Management, a financial planning and investments firm, from 2004 to 2007, and his former directorships include Harbor Global Company Ltd., an asset management, natural resources and real estate investment company, from 2001 to 2006, Silver Bay from 2015 to 2016, PioGlobal Asset Management, a private investment management company, from 2001 to 2006, The Pioneer Group Inc., a global investment management firm, from 1999 to 2000, and TBA Entertainment Corporation, a strategic communications and entertainment marketing company, from 2000 to 2004. He was co-founder and Executive Vice President of Southeastern Asset Management, Inc., a global investment management firm, and former President of Longleaf Partners Mutual Funds, from 1975 to 2000. He served as an Investment Officer at First Tennessee Investment Management, the investment management division of First Horizon National Corporation, a bank holding company, from 1973 to 1975. Mr. Sanders is chairman of the Hugo Dixon Foundation and a trustee of the Dixon Gallery and Gardens, the Hutchison School, Rhodes College and the Tennessee Shakespeare Company, and is a former trustee of The Jefferson Scholars Foundation and the Campbell Clinic Foundation. Mr. Sanders was initially appointed to our Board pursuant to a Director Designation Agreement, between us and Two Harbors, entered into in connection with our formation transaction and IPO. We believe Mr. Sanders is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because of his extensive background in the financial services and real estate businesses and his experience serving as a director and audit committee member of public companies.
Hope B. Woodhouse is an independent member of our Board and has served as a director of the Company since its inception. Ms. Woodhouse has over 25 years of experience in the financial services industry at top-ranked, global alternative asset management firms and broker dealers. Ms. Woodhouse has served as a director of Two Harbors since May 2012, and is currently chair of its risk oversight committee and a member of its audit committee. From 2005 to 2009, she served as Chief Operating Officer and as a member of the management committee for Bridgewater Associates, LP, an investment management firm. Between 2003 and 2005, Ms. Woodhouse was President and Chief Operating Officer of Auspex Group LP, an investment management firm, and was Chief Operating Officer and a member of the management committee of Soros Fund Management, LLC, an investment management firm, from 2000 to 2003. Prior to that, she held various executive leadership positions, including Treasurer of Funds at Tiger Management Corp., a hedge fund, from 1998 to 2000, and Managing Director of the Global Finance Department at Salomon Brothers Inc., an investment bank, from 1983 to 1998. She served as a director of Piper Jaffray Companies, a multinational independent investment bank and financial services company (NYSE: PJC), and as a member of its audit and compensation committees from 2011 to 2014, Seoul Securities Co. Ltd., a brokerage firm, from 2001 to 2003, and The Bond Market Association, an international trade association, from 1997 to 1998. Ms. Woodhouse also serves on the boards of the Kindergarten Reading Collaborative, Children’s Services Advisory Committee and the John’s Island Community Service League, and is a trustee of the Tiger Foundation. Ms. Woodhouse received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and an A.B. degree in Economics from Georgetown University. Ms. Woodhouse was initially appointed to our Board pursuant to a Director Designation Agreement, between us and Two Harbors, entered into in connection with our formation transaction and IPO. We believe Ms. Woodhouse is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because of her background in the financial services industry, her experience as a director of public companies and her qualification as an audit committee financial expert.
VOTING RECOMMENDATION
OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board is committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance. As described more fully below, we have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to the conduct of our officers and directors, as well as to the employees of our Manager and its affiliates. We have also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which, in conjunction with our Charter, Bylaws and our board committee charters, provide the framework for our corporate governance practices.
You can access our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and certain other policies under “Corporate Governance” in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.gpmtreit.com or by writing to our Investor Relations department at Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers and directors and to the officers, directors and employees of our Manager and its affiliates when such individuals are acting for us or on our behalf. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to detect and deter wrongdoing and to promote:
honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC reports and other public communications;
compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to appropriate persons identified in the Code; and
accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our executive officers or directors may be made only by our Board, or a committee thereof, and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or stock exchange listing standards. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was adopted by the Board on June 14, 2017 and updated on March 18, 2020.
Director Independence
NYSE listing standards require that a majority of a company’s board of directors be composed of “independent directors,” which is defined generally as a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company, or its subsidiaries, or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with these considerations, our Board has affirmatively determined, upon the review and recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that each of the following directors and director nominees meets the qualifications of an independent director: Tanuja M. Dehne, Martin A. Kamarck, Stephen G. Kasnet, W. Reid Sanders and Hope B. Woodhouse.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board is led by a Chair who is appointed by the directors. Both independent and non-independent directors are eligible for appointment as the Chair. The Chair presides at all meetings of our stockholders and of our Board. The Chair performs such other duties and exercises such powers as from time to time shall be prescribed in our Bylaws or by our Board. Our Board has appointed Mr. Kasnet, who qualifies as an independent director, to serve as our Chair.
Our Board consists of a majority of independent directors and exercises a strong, independent oversight function. All of the committees of our Board are comprised entirely of independent directors. A number of board committee processes and procedures, including regular executive sessions of independent directors and a regular review of the performance of our Manager, provide substantial independent oversight of our management’s performance. Under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board has the ability to change its structure if it determines that such a change is appropriate and in the best interest of our Company. Our Board believes that these factors provide the appropriate balance between the authority of those who oversee our Company and those who manage it on a day-to-day basis. 


We currently separate the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer.
Board Committees
Our Board has formed three standing committees, including our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, and has adopted charters for each of these committees. Each committee is composed exclusively of directors who meet the independence and other requirements established by the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE listing standards. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of individuals intended to be, to the extent required by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, non-employee directors. 
The following table summarizes the current membership of each of our standing committees.
DirectorAuditCompensation
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Tanuja M. DehnexChair
Martin A. KamarckChairx
Stephen G. KasnetChair
W. Reid Sandersxx
Hope B. Woodhousexx

In addition, in 2019, the Board formed an ad hoc committee, the Independent Committee, composed exclusively of our five independent directors. On March 2, 2020, we announced that we have agreed to a process with our Manager to internalize the Company’s management function and that the Independent Committee has been negotiating the internalization on our behalf.
Audit Committee 
Our Audit Committee is responsible for engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, preparing Audit Committee reports, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. 
Our Audit Committee is, and will at all times be, composed exclusively of “independent directors,” as defined under the NYSE listing standards and who otherwise meet the NYSE listing standards. Each member of our Audit Committee is also financially literate, in that they are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. 
In addition, as a listed company, we must certify that our Audit Committee has, and will continue to have, at least one member who is financially sophisticated in that he or she has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Kasnet and Ms. Woodhouse satisfies the definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC. 
Our Audit Committee’s purpose and responsibilities are more fully set forth in its charter.
Compensation Committee
The principal functions of our Compensation Committee are to:
evaluate the performance of our executive officers;
in consultation with senior management, establish the Company’s general compensation philosophy and review the compensation philosophy of our Manager;
evaluate the performance of our Manager;


review the compensation and fees payable to our Manager under the Management Agreement between us and our Manager dated June 28, 2017, or the Management Agreement;
review the compensation and fees payable to any affiliates of our Manager or any other related party;
prepare Compensation Committee reports;
make recommendations to our Board with respect to our Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans; and
administer any equity incentive plan, including the issuance of any common stock or other equity awards thereunder to employees of our Manager or its affiliates who provide services to us under the Management Agreement.
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to our Board regarding the compensation of our Company’s independent directors. In doing so, our Compensation Committee will work with our independent compensation consultant and consider, among other things, the following: 
the compensation that is paid to directors of other companies that are comparable to us;
the amount of time directors are expected to devote to preparing for and attending meetings of our Board and the committees on which they serve;
the success of our Company;
whether a director is a lead independent director or chair of our Board or one of the committees of our Board and the time commitment related thereto;
if a committee on which a director serves undertakes a special assignment, the importance of that special assignment to our Company and its stockholders; and
the risks involved in serving as a director on our Board or a member of its committees.
Other than our Chief Executive Officer, who serves as a non-independent director, none of our executive officers are involved in determining independent director compensation levels, although our management team may provide support to the Compensation Committee and its independent compensation consultant, including certain information, data and other resources in connection with its compensation recommendations to our Board. 
Our Compensation Committee may delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee’s purpose and responsibilities are more fully set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee 
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for seeking, considering and recommending to our Board qualified candidates for election as directors and approves and recommends to the full Board the appointment of each of our executive officers. It also periodically prepares and submits to our Board for adoption its selection criteria for director nominees. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our Board and our corporate governance, and annually recommends to our Board nominees for each committee of our Board. In addition, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually facilitates the assessment of our Board’s performance and report thereon to our Board. 
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following factors in making its recommendations to the Board: background experience, skills, expertise, accessibility and availability to serve effectively on the Board. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of potential candidates.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s purpose and responsibilities are more fully set forth in its charter.


Role of Our Board in Risk Oversight
Our management team is responsible for assessing and managing the risks faced by our Company, subject to the oversight of our Board. Our Board exercises its oversight of our Company’s risks, including through the review of our business plans, capital structure, financial results and infrastructure. Our Board has also established investment guidelines, which set parameters for the type and size of investments we can make without further Board approval. Additionally, our Board relies upon our Audit Committee to oversee risks related to the quality and integrity of our financial reports, the performance and independence of our external auditor, the performance of our internal audit function, our policies regarding accounting, financial matters and internal controls, performance of our information technology and data security function, including as it relates to cybersecurity, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Our Audit Committee also discusses and reviews policies with respect to our risk assessment and risk management, including, but not limited to, the adequacy of our insurance coverage, our interest rate risk management, our counter-party and credit risks, our capital availability and refinancing risks.
Our Board relies upon our Compensation Committee to oversee and evaluate risks related to our Company’s compensation programs, including the formulation, administration and regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters. The Compensation Committee also considers, and discusses with management, whether any risks arising from those compensation policies the Company oversees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees and evaluates programs and risks associated with the Board and its committees’ membership and structure, succession planning and corporate governance.
Management routinely informs the Board and its committees of developments that could affect our risk profile or other aspects of our business.
Cyber Security
Our Manager currently provides our Company with personnel, including its Chief Information Security Officer, to help manage the growing complexity of cyber risks. Our Manager’s Chief Information Security Officer reports to our Board and/or our Audit Committee on a regular basis regarding our Company’s exposure to cyber risk, including with respect to our cyber security infrastructure, the development and implementation of policies, procedures, standards and technical measures to create an environment that is designed to minimize exposure to cyber threats and recovery from adverse events, if any.
Board and Committee Meetings
Our Board held nine meetings during 2019. During five of the meetings of our Board, the independent directors also met separately in executive sessions, without management present, to discuss various matters. The Chair of the Board presided at such executive sessions. During 2019, our Audit Committee held seven meetings, our Compensation Committee held seven meetings and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate total number of meetings held by the Board and all committees on which he or she served during 2019. Although we do not have a policy on director attendance at our annual meetings of stockholders, directors are encouraged to attend all annual meetings. Each of our then-current directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders held in May 2019.
Director Nomination Process
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the following minimum qualifications for directors in order to be considered for a position on our Board: 
possession of the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;
the ability to exercise good business judgment and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders;
having an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and
the willingness to devote the sufficient time and effort to carrying out Board duties and responsibilities effectively, including preparing for and attending meetings of the Board and its committees.
In considering candidates for nomination as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee generally assembles all information regarding a candidate’s background and qualifications, evaluates a candidate’s mix of skills and qualifications and determines the contribution that the candidate could be expected to make to the overall functioning of our Board.


Although we do not have a formal policy on diversity, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Company shall endeavor to have a Board representing a diverse education and experience that provides knowledge of business, financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to our business and to our status as a publicly owned company. With respect to the re-nomination of current directors, the Committee considers the foregoing factors, as well as past participation in, and contributions to, the activities of our Board and its committees. 
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended for nomination to our Board by our stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for nominees to the Board should be submitted in writing to our Secretary. The manner in which such Committee evaluates candidates recommended by stockholders is generally the same as any other candidate, including customary diligence, interviews and background checks. However, the Committee will also seek and consider information concerning any relationship between a stockholder recommending a candidate and the candidate to determine if the candidate can represent the interests of all of the stockholders. The Committee will not evaluate a candidate recommended by a stockholder unless the stockholder’s proposal provides a certification that the potential candidate consents to being named in our proxy statement and will serve as a director if elected.
Majority Voting for Directors and Director Resignation Policy
Our Bylaws provide that a director nominee will be elected by receiving the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the election of such nominee on a per nominee basis in an uncontested election (which occurs when the number of director nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected). If a director nominee who is an incumbent director receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election and with respect to whom no successor has been elected, such incumbent director shall promptly tender his or her offer to resign to our Board for its consideration following certification of the stockholder vote. Within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the tendered resignation offer and make a recommendation to our Board whether or not to accept such offer, and our Board shall act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. In determining whether to accept the resignation offer, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation offer, including, among other things, whether accepting the resignation of such director would cause our Company to fail to meet any applicable SEC or stock exchange rules or requirements. Thereafter, our Board shall promptly and publicly disclose its decision-making process regarding whether to accept the director’s resignation offer or the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable, in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. Any director who tenders his or her resignation offer will not participate in our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or our Board’s action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If our Board does not accept the director’s resignation offer, such director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.
In a contested election, the director nominees who receive a plurality of all the votes cast at a meeting of stockholders duly called and at which a quorum is present will be elected as directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of nominees equal to the number of vacancies to be filled who receive more votes than other nominees are elected to our Board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of votes cast.
Communications with our Board
We provide the opportunity for our stockholders and all other interested parties to communicate with members of our Board. Stockholders and all other interested parties may communicate with the independent directors or the chair of any of the committees of the Board by email or regular mail. All communications should be sent to the Company’s Secretary, Rebecca B. Sandberg, by email to secretary@gpmortgagetrust.com or by regular mail to the attention of the independent directors, the Chair of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Compensation Committee or the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as the case may be, in each instance in care of the Secretary at the Company’s office at 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036. 
Our Secretary will review each communication received in accordance with this process to determine whether the communication requires immediate action. Our Secretary will forward all appropriate communications received, or a summary of such communications, to the appropriate member(s) of our Board. However, we reserve the right to disregard any communication that we determine is unduly hostile, threatening or illegal, does not reasonably relate to us or our business or is similarly inappropriate. Our Secretary has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications. 
Stockholder proposals must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our current Bylaws or the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act and not the procedures set forth in the preceding paragraph or the procedures set forth


in “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors - Director Nomination Process.” Nominations for the Board may only be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. Certain matters set forth in our Bylaws for stockholder proposals, including nominations for our Board, as well as certain matters set forth in Rule 14a-8 for stockholder proposals, are described in “Other Matters - Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2021 Annual Meeting.”
Director Compensation
We compensate the independent members of our Board for their service. It is our belief that director compensation should:
align the interests of our directors and our stockholders;
ensure our Company can attract and retain outstanding director candidates who meet the selection criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter; and
reflect the substantial time commitment of our directors necessary to oversee our business.
Generally, it has been our practice to compensate our independent directors with a mix of cash and common stock awards.  We do not pay any compensation to the non-independent directors for their service on our Board.  However, all members of our Board are reimbursed for their costs and expenses of serving on the Board, including costs and expenses of attending all meetings of our Board and its committees.  As discussed above, the Compensation Committee Charter provides that the Compensation Committee has the primary responsibility for reviewing and recommending any changes to director compensation. Our Board reviews the Compensation Committee’s recommendations and determines the amount and manner of independent director compensation.
Independent Director Compensation for 2019
For the one-year term commencing immediately following the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and ending at the Annual Meeting, our independent directors, which includes the individuals listed below, earned the following fees for their service:
for each independent director, an annual fee of $125,000, paid half in cash and half in restricted shares of our common stock;
for the Audit Committee Chair, an additional fee of $15,000, paid half in cash and half in restricted shares of our common stock;
for each of the Compensation Committee Chair and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair, an additional fee of $5,000, paid half in cash and half in restricted shares of our common stock; and
for the independent Chair of the Board, an additional fee of $50,000, paid half in cash and half in restricted shares of our common stock.
The cash portion of the annual fee is paid in four equal quarterly installments over the course of the service term. The restricted stock portion of the annual fee is granted under our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Equity Incentive Plan, which generally occurs on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders at which such director is elected. The number of shares of restricted stock subject to issuance is determined using the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, which is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The restricted stock granted to the independent directors under our Equity Incentive Plan as part of the director fee noted above fully vests on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, so long as such director has complied with the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement.


The following table shows the compensation of our independent directors for services in all capacities provided to us10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019:
Name 
Fees
Paid in Cash(1)
 
Stock
Awards(2)(3)
 Total
Tanuja M. Dehne $65,000 $64,993 $129,993
Martin A. Kamarck $65,000 $64,993 $129,993
Stephen G. Kasnet $91,250 $94,988 $186,238
W. Reid Sanders $62,500 $62,492 $124,992
Hope B. Woodhouse $62,500 $62,492 $124,992
       
(1)This column sets forth the cash fees paid by us during the year ended December 31, 2019. The current term of each of the independent directors expires on the date of the Annual Meeting.
(2)The values in this column were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and are based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date of the stock award.
(3)As of December 31, 2019, the following directors had the following amounts of shares of outstanding unvested restricted common stock: Ms. Dehne, 3,378; Mr. Kamarck, 3,378; Mr. Kasnet, 4,937; Mr. Sanders, 3,248; and Ms. Woodhouse, 3,248.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Compensation Committee Interlocks2020, and Insider Participation
None of the members of our Compensation Committee is,for all subsequent reporting periods ending on or has been, employed by us. None of our executive officers currently serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or our Compensation Committee. In 2019, two of our directors, Messrs. Siering and William M. Roth, each of whom was a partner of our Manager during that time, participated in making compensation decisions for our executive officers and employees of our Manager and its affiliates who provide services to our Company. Mr. Roth retired from our Board effectiveafter December 31, 2019.
Transactions with Related Persons
Management Agreement with our Manager
We are currently party2021, we have elected to present Distributable Earnings, a Management Agreement with our Manager pursuant to which our Manager provides the day-to-day management of our business, including providing us with our executive officers and all other personnel necessary to support our operations. The Management Agreement requires our Manager to manage our business in conformity with the policies and the investment guidelinesmeasure that are approved and monitored by our Board. The Management Agreement has an initial three-year term, which expires on June 28, 2020, and renews automatically for successive one-year terms unless earlier terminated by either us or our Manageris not prepared in accordance with GAAP, as a supplemental method of evaluating our operating performance. Distributable Earnings replaces our prior presentation of Core Earnings with no changes to the terms thereof. Our Manager is entitleddefinition. In order to receivemaintain our status as a termination fee from us under certain circumstances. In exchange for its services,REIT, we are obligatedrequired to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income as dividends. Distributable Earnings is intended to serve as a general, though imperfect, proxy for our taxable income. As such, Distributable Earnings is considered a key indicator of our ability to generate sufficient income to pay our Manager an annual management fee comprisedcommon dividends, which is the primary focus of income-oriented investors who comprise a base fee and an incentive fee, as well as reimburse it for certain expenses incurred by it and its affiliates in rendering management services to us. Mr. Siering, a membermeaningful segment of our Board,stockholder base. We believe providing Distributable Earnings on a supplemental basis to our net income (loss) and cash flow from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, is a partnerhelpful to stockholders in assessing the overall run-rate operating performance of our Manager. Mr. Taylor, a memberbusiness.
We use Distributable Earnings to evaluate our performance, excluding the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments we believe are not necessarily indicative of our Boardcurrent loan portfolio and our President and Chief Executive Officer, Marcin Urbaszek, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Stephen Alpart, our Chief Investment Officer, Steven Plust, our Chief Operations Officer, Rebecca B. Sandberg, our Secretary, and Michael J. Karber, our General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, are each employees of an affiliate of our Manager.
We incurred charges of $26.8 million for fiscal year 2019 related to the Management Agreement, of which $14.9 million represented the base management fee, $0.2 million represented incentive fees and $11.7 million represented expense reimbursements for general and administrative expenses incurred on behalf of the Company in the normal course of its operations and certain compensation expenses incurred by our Manager,operations. For reporting purposes, we define Distributable Earnings as described in greater detail below.
Under the Management Agreement, we pay our Manager a base management fee equal to 1.5% of equity on an annualized basis. For purposes of calculating the management fee, “equity” means the sum of the net proceeds from all issuances of our equity securities, plus cumulative “core earnings” at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter, less any distributions to stockholders, any amount paid to repurchase stock and any incentive fees earned by our Manager, but excluding the incentive


fee earned in the current quarter. In addition, if earned, we pay our Manager an incentive fee equal to the excess of (1) the product of (a) 20% and (b) the result of (i) “core earnings” for the previous 12-month period, minus (ii) the product of (A) equity in the previous 12-month period, and (B) 8% per annum, less (2) the sum of any incentive fees paid to our Manager with respect to the first three calendar quarters of such previous 12-month period; provided, however, that no incentive fees are payable with respect to any calendar quarter unless “core earnings” for the 12 most recently completed calendar quarters in the aggregate is greater than zero.
For purpose of calculating the base management and incentive fees, “core earnings” means net income (loss) attributable to commonour stockholders, excludingcomputed in accordance with GAAP, excluding: (i) non-cash equity compensation expense, incentive fees earned by our Manager,expenses; (ii) depreciation and amortization,amortization; (iii) any unrealized gains or losses(losses) or other similar non-cash items that are included in net income for the applicable reporting period (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss(loss) or in net income)income for such period); and (iv) certain non-cash items and one-time expenses. Distributable Earnings may also be adjusted from time to time for reporting purposes to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in U.S. GAAP and certain other material non-cash income or expense items in each case after discussions between our Manager and the independent members of our Board and approved by a majority of our independent directors.
In 2019, we reimbursed our Manager for a share The exclusion of depreciation and amortization from the compensation expenses paid by our Manager’s affiliatecalculation of Distributable Earnings only applies to its employees providing services to us, including a total of approximately $2.1 million for compensation paid to employees of our Manager’s affiliate serving as our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel. We did not reimburse our Manager for any expensesdebt investments related to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Investment Officer.
As noted above, we recently announced that we have agreed to a process with our Manager to internalize the Company’s management function. If the internalization is completed, the Management Agreement will be terminated and, thereafter, we will no longer be obligated to pay our Manager base management or incentive fees or reimburse our Manager for expenses as described above. There can be no assurance that the internalization will be consummated.
Indemnification Agreements with Directors and Officers
We have entered into customary indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers that require us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, and our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, against any claim or liability that may arise by reason of their service to us. The agreements also require us to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. In addition, each agreement provides for procedures for the determination of entitlement to indemnification, including requiring that such determination be made by independent counsel after a change in control of us.
Related Person Transaction Policies 
Our Audit Committee Charter requires our Audit Committee to review, approve and oversee any related party transactions involving our Company and also authorizes such Committee to develop policies and procedures for its approval of related party transactions.
Our Management Agreement places restrictions on our Manager from entering into transactions with its related parties or providing services under the Management Agreement on terms that are no more favorable to our Manager or its affiliates than would be obtained from a third party on an arm’s-length basis, in any event unless approved by a majority of our independent directors.



STOCK OWNERSHIP
Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Director Nominees and Named Executive Officers
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GPMT.” The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 3, 2020 (unless otherwise indicated) by each of our “named executive officers,” as such term is defined in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act, or our Named Executive Officers, current directors and director nominees and by all of the current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares of common stock if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of April 3, 2020. “Voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned(2)
 
Percent of Class(2)
Directors and Director Nominees:    
     
Tanuja M. Dehne 10,581 *
Martin A. Kamarck 9,581 *
Stephen G. Kasnet 27,155 *
W. Reid Sanders 77,175 *
Thomas E. Siering 185,482 *
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor 278,862 *
Hope B. Woodhouse 19,674 *
Named Executive Officers:    
Stephen Alpart 147,112 *
Steven Plust 174,502 *
Marcin Urbaszek(3)
 59,146 *
Rebecca B. Sandberg 33,330 *
All director nominees and executive officers as a group (12 individuals) (2)
 1,044,309 1.89%
     
*Represents ownership of less than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock as of April 3, 2020.
(1)The business address of each of the individuals is 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036.
(2)Based on 55,136,885 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 3, 2020. Under our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, Named Executive Officers and employees are prohibited from hedging or pledging shares of our stock in any manner, whether as collateral for a loan, in a margin account held at a broker or otherwise.
(3)Includes 94 shares of common stock held by Mr. Urbaszek’s mother.


Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent of Our Common Stock
Based on their filings made under Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act, the persons known by us to be beneficial owners of five percent (5%) or more of our common stock are as follows:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
 
Percent of Class(1)
BlackRock, Inc.(2)
   55 East 52nd Street
   New York, NY 10055
 9,658,833  17.52%
The Vanguard Group(3)
   100 Vanguard Blvd.
   Malvern, PA 19355
 5,663,346  10.27%
      
(1)Based on 55,136,885 shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 9, 2020.
(2)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 4, 2020, by BlackRock, Inc. reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 9,516,084 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares reported.
(3)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on April 9, 2020, by The Vanguard Group reporting that it has sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 58,589 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 5,565,788 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 97,558 shares.
Hedging and Other Transactions Prohibited
The Board has adopted, as part of our insider trading policy, prohibitions against our officers, directors, employees and consultants, and all employees, partners and consultants of our Manager, engaging in transactions designed to profit from fluctuations in the price of our securities, such as short sales or purchasing our securities on margin. In addition, such persons are prohibited from purchasing or selling puts or calls or other derivative securities on our securities, pledging our securities as collateral for a loan or entering into hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to our securities.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our directors are encouraged to own shares of our common stock in order to better align their personal interests with the interests of our stockholders. In furtherance of this objective, our director stock ownership guidelines require each director to own at least $200,000 in shares of our common stock within five years of being elected to our Board and thereafter so long as such person continues to serve as a director. Common stock granted in respect of annual director fees is counted toward achieving these stock ownership guidelines. Under our Insider Trading Policy, our directors are prohibited from hedging or pledging shares of our common stock in any manner, whether as collateral for a loan, in a margin account held at a broker or otherwise.


INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following sets forth the positions, ages and selected biographical information for our executive officers as of April 23, 2020. Mr. Taylor’s biographical information is provided in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Proposal 1: Election of Directors.” There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which they were selected as an executive officer.
NameAgeOffice or Position Held
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor64President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Stephen Alpart56Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
Steven Plust61Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Marcin Urbaszek44Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Rebecca B. Sandberg48Vice President and Secretary
Michael J. Karber40Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Stephen Alpart is our Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and has served in that role since the Company’s inception. Mr. Alpart is also a member of our Investment Committee. Before joining our Manager, he was Managing Director in the Prudential Financial, Inc., an insurance, investment management and financial products company, Global Real Estate Finance Group, focused on the United States from 2009 to 2014. Previously, he was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group at GMAC Commercial Mortgage and Capmark Investments where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and private owner/operators. Prior to that, he was a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group at PaineWebber & Co., an investment bank and stock brokerage firm, and later an Executive Director in the Real Estate Group of UBS Group AG, a Swiss multinational investment bank and financial services company, where he focused on originating, underwriting and closing large structured commercial real estate loans for private equity firms and owner/operators. He has worked in real estate finance and debt investing for over 25 years in a variety of functions, including third-party funds management, proprietary on-book lending, transaction advisory business, loan syndications, loan sales and workouts/restructurings. Mr. Alpart received a Masters in Business Administration, Finance and Real Estate, from New York University and a B.S. in Business Administration, Accounting and Economics, from Washington University.
Steven Plust is our Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and has served in that role since the Company’s inception. Mr. Plust is also a member of our Investment Committee. Prior to joining our Manager, Mr. Plust was a Managing Director in the Prudential Financial, Inc., an insurance, investment management and financial products company, Global Real Estate Finance Group from 2009 to 2014. He has over 25 years of experience in real estate finance and capital markets, and was an advisor to the Resolution Trust Corporation in the development and implementation of its securitization programs. Mr. Plust has worked for over 20 years in principal investing platforms on Wall Street and in investment management, where he has been primarily responsible for transaction pricing and structuring, credit risk assessment and analysis of complex transactions and multi-asset portfolios. He received a Masters in Business Administration from Columbia University and a B.S. in Chemistry from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Marcin Urbaszek is our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and has served in those roles since the Company’s inception. He joined our Manager in May 2013 and, until the formation of the Company, served as a Managing Director of Two Harbors focusing on strategy, corporate development and capital markets activities. Prior to joining our Manager, Mr. Urbaszek worked at Credit Suisse Group AG, a Swiss multinational investment bank and financial services company, in the Financial Institutions Group, Investment Banking, serving in various capacities from 2006 to April 2013, most recently as a team lead and partner on coverage and strategic transaction execution for residential and commercial mortgage companies, banks and other specialty consumer and commercial lenders. He has over 19 years of experience in various areas of finance including corporate finance, capital markets and equity research, with the last 15 years dedicated to financial institutions. Over the course of his career, Mr. Urbaszek has been primarily responsible for transaction advisory, structuring, negotiation and execution, as well as financial planning and analysis. Mr. Urbaszek received a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance, with a Minor focused on Financial Accounting and Economics, from Zicklin School of Business, Bernard M. Baruch College, CUNY. Mr. Urbaszek is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Charterholder.
Rebecca B. Sandberg is our Vice President and Secretary and has served in that role since the Company’s inception. From the Company’s inception to December 31, 2019, Ms. Sandberg also served as our General Counsel. In addition, she serves as the General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary of Two Harbors, a position she has held since March 2013. Ms. Sandberg served as Deputy General Counsel and Secretary of Two Harbors beginning in May 2012, and from 2010 to May 2012 she served as Senior Counsel to Two Harbors. Prior to joining Two Harbors in 2010, Ms. Sandberg was in the private practice of law where


she advised clients of all sizes primarily in the areas of federal and state securities laws, mergers and acquisitions, public and private capital markets transactions, corporate governance and general corporate law. She received a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Minnesota and a Juris Doctorate from William Mitchell College of Law.
Michael J. Karber is our Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary and has served in that role since January 1, 2020. He has been with the Company since its inception, previously serving as our Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from 2018 to 2019. Prior to joining the Company, he was Lead Counsel - Business Operations at Two Harbors beginning in 2014. Prior to joining Two Harbors, he was a Portfolio Manager at Presidium Asset Solutions, an asset management and loan servicing company, from 2010 to 2014, and from 2007 to 2009 he was an Associate at Pircher, Nicols & Meeks LLP. Prior to that, Mr. Karber was an Associate at Dykema Gossett PLLC. Mr. Karber received a B.A. in Political Science and Psychology from the University of Michigan and a J.D. from Northwestern University, Pritzker School of Law.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Our Compensation Committee has furnished the following report. The information contained in this “Compensation Committee Report” is not to be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor is such information to be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference intoforeclose upon the property or properties underlying such filings.debt investments.
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussedWhile Distributable Earnings excludes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis” required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-Kimpact of the Exchange Act with management.unrealized non-cash current provision for credit losses, we expect to only recognize such potential credit losses in Distributable Earnings if and when such amounts are deemed non-recoverable. This is generally at the time a loan is repaid, or in the case of foreclosure, when the underlying asset is sold, but non-recoverability may also be concluded if, in our determination, it is nearly certain that all amounts due will not be collected. The realized loss amount reflected in Distributable Earnings will equal the difference between the cash received, or expected to be received, and the carrying value of the asset, and is reflective of our economic experience as it relates to the ultimate realization of the loan.
Based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board thatDuring theCompensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board:
Martin A. Kamarck (Chair)
Tanuja M. Dehne
W. Reid Sanders


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation program, objectives and policies for our Named Executive Officers for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, or fiscal 2019.
Our Named Executive Officers2022, we recorded provision for fiscal 2019 were:
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor, our President, Chief Executive Officercredit losses of $(69.3) million, of which $(44.2) million has been excluded from Distributable Earnings consistent with other unrealized gains (losses) and Director;
Stephen Alpart, our Vice President and Chief Investment Officer;
Steven Plust, our Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;
Marcin Urbaszek, our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and
Rebecca B. Sandberg, our Vice President, Secretary and former General Counsel.

Michael J. Karber was appointed as our Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary effective as of January 1, 2020 following the resignation of Ms. Sandberg as our General Counsel.
Overview of Compensation Program and Philosophy
We do not currently have any employees and we are currently managed by our Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement. As a result, none of our Named Executive Officers are employees of our Company and none of our Named Executive Officers receive cash compensation from us.
Our Manager currently provides the day-to-day management of our Company’s operations. All of our Named Executive Officers are currently employees of an affiliate of our Manager, who makes them available to our Manager who, in turn, provides them to us under the terms of the Management Agreement. Because the Management Agreement provides that our Manager is responsible for managing our affairs, our Named Executive Officers do not currently receive any cash compensation from us or any of our subsidiaries for serving as our executive officers and we do not reimburse our Manager for any cash compensation paid by it to our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Investment Officer. In addition, the Management Agreement does not require our Named Executive Officers to dedicate a specific amount of time to fulfilling our Manager’s obligations to us under the Management Agreement. Our Management Agreement also does not require that any specified amount or percentage of the base management fees and incentive fees we pay to our Manager be allocated to our Named Executive Officers. However, we estimate that the aggregate cash compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers that may reasonably be associated with their management of our Company totaled approximately $4.6 million for fiscal 2019. This aggregate amount represents approximately 17.2% of the $26.8 million in total base management fees, incentive fees and expense reimbursements paid by us to our Manager for fiscal 2019.
Of the aggregate cash compensation paid by our Manager to our Named Executive Officers in 2019 that was reasonably associated with their management of our Company, we estimate that approximately 52.0% represented fixed compensation (e.g., salaries) and 48.0% represented variable compensation (e.g., performance-based bonuses and profit sharing). We understand that our Manager takes into account a number of factors in determining the amount of variable compensation it pays to each of our Named Executive Officers; for example, based on the individual’s position, factors may include our Company’s net equity, financial results and overall performance, total stockholder return, market practices and the recommendations of our Compensation Committee and its independent compensation consultant.
Our Manager and its affiliates also determine whether, and to what extent, our Named Executive Officers will be provided with employee benefit plans. We do not currently have employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers and we do not currently provide pension or retirement benefits, perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers.
While we may not currently pay our Named Executive Officers any cash compensation, we currently pay our Manager the base management and incentive fees and reimburse our Manager for certain expenses it incurs in the course of rendering services to us under the Management Agreement, as described in more detail in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions - Transactions With Related Persons - Management Agreement.” Additionally, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of our Board, as ratified by our Board, we may also grant our Named Executive Officers equity awards that vest annually over a three-year periodnon-cash items pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan, or equity awards, as described in more detail in “Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Equity Awards.” We believe that our use of equity awards and the long-term nature of the vesting of those equity awards serve to further align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders


and mitigate the possibility of excessive risk taking. For fiscal 2019, we incurred $14.9 million in base management fees, $0.2 million in incentive fees and $11.7 million in expense reimbursementsexisting policy for reporting Distributable Earnings referenced above. Pursuant to our Manager under the Management Agreement.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our committee charters require our Board and certain of its committees to oversee our relationship with, and compensation paid to, our Manager. The base management and incentive fees cannot be increased or revised without the approval of our independent directors. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions - Transactions with Related Persons - Management Agreement”existing policy for further discussion of the terms of the Management Agreement, including the base management and incentive fees payable to our Manager and our expense reimbursement obligations to our Manager thereunder.
As notedreporting Distributable Earnings referenced above, we recently announced that we have agreed to a process with our Manager to internalize the Company’s management function. In connection with the completion of the internalization, we expect to continue to be managed by our strong senior management team along with other personnel providing services to us, who are currently employed by our Manager, and to whom the Independent Committee expects to extend offers of employment. If the internalization is completed, the Management Agreement will be terminated and, thereafter, we will no longer be obligated to pay our Manager base management or incentive fees or reimburse our Manager for expenses. There can be no assurance that the internalization will be consummated.
Role of Compensation Committee
Currently, we do not have any employees and our Named Executive Officers, each of whom is an employee of an affiliate of our Manager, do not receive any cash compensation from us or any of our subsidiaries for serving as executive officers. While our Compensation Committee consults with our Manager regarding cash compensation it pays to our Named Executive Officers, our Manager is responsible for paying such cash compensation and making all decisions relating thereto based on such factors as it determines appropriate. Our Compensation Committee reviews and approves the equity awards to be paid or made by us to our Named Executive Officers based on recommendations from our Company’s Chief Executive Officer, other than with respect to himself, and its independent compensation consultant.
Role of Compensation Consultant
From January through July 2019, our Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance, LLC, or Pay Governance, as its independent compensation consultant. Beginning in August 2019, our Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC, or Semler Brossy, as its independent compensation consultant. Our Compensation Committee considered advice and recommendations received from Pay Governance and Semler Brossy regarding compensation matters, including decisions made with respect to director compensation and equity awards. Neither Pay Governance nor Semler Brossy provided services to our Company other than the advice provided to our Compensation Committee, and each of Pay Governance and Semler Brossy has advised our Compensation Committee that the payments for fees and direct expense reimbursements it received from us during 2019 were immaterial as a percentage of their income for the period. Each of Pay Governance and Semler Brossy has also advised us that neither it nor, to its knowledge, any member of its consulting team who provides services to our Compensation Committee owns any shares of our common stock. After considering the foregoing, as well as the conflict of interest policies and procedures of each of Pay Governance and Semler Brossy and the lack of known business and personal relationships between each of Pay Governance and Semler Brossy, its team members providing services to our Compensation Committee and its members and our Named Executive Officers, our Compensation Committee concluded that the provision of services to the Committee by each of Pay Governance and Semler Brossy did not raise any conflict of interest concerns pursuant to the SEC and NYSE rules.
Role of Executive Officers
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for making all equity award decisions related to our Named Executive Officers. Our Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the financial performance of our Company, current market conditions and the performance of each Named Executive Officer and, based on these reviews, provides a recommendation regarding the appropriate equity awards, if any, other than his own, to be presented to our Compensation Committee for approval.
Say-On-Pay Vote
At our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation. More than 98% of the votes cast at our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders voted to approve our executive compensation as described in our proxy statement for the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. Our Compensation Committee will carefully consider future stockholder votes on this matter, along with other expressions of stockholder views it receives on specific policies and desirable actions.


Equity Compensation
Our Compensation Committee may, from time to time pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan, grant equity awards to our Named Executive Officers. These equity awards generally provide for ratable vesting on an annual basis over a three-year period, with accelerated vesting occurring under certain circumstances, as described in further detail in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” These awards are designed to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders, by allowing our Named Executive Officers to share in the creation of value for our stockholders through capital appreciation and dividends. We also believe that the vesting restrictions are an important retention and risk management device that encourages our Named Executive Officers to focus on sustaining our Company’s long-term performance and delivering total return to our stockholders, rather than encouraging decisions that result in short-term benefits to our Company or excessive risk-taking.
Our Compensation Committee reviews the recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer, other than with respect to himself, and its independent compensation consultant in determining the appropriate size of the equity award for each Named Executive Officer. These recommendations take into account the financial performance of our Company during the prior fiscal year, current market conditions, the performance of each executive officer and the desire to align the interests of each of our executive officers with our stockholders.
In addition, our Compensation Committee considered a number of key factors in determining the size of the equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in 2019, including that, in 2018, we executed our first collateralized loan obligation transaction, we established a two-year $75 million short-term financing facility, we raised approximately $130 million of additional investable capital to support further portfolio growth by issuing five-year senior unsecured convertible bonds, we originated forty-four new commercial real estate loans for a total of $1.57 billion during the fiscal year, an increase of 24% in volume and 63% in loan count versus 2017, and we maintained a 100% performing portfolio with no credit impairments recognized, among other things. There was no specific numerical value given to any individual factor and each factor was considered in light of the other factors noted along with any additional information available to our Compensation Committee at the time, including market conditions in general.


Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the equity compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers during the fiscal years ending December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 for services rendered to us during the fiscal years presented:
Name and Principal PositionYear
Restricted Stock Awards(1)
All Other Compensation(2)
Total(3)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor,
President and Chief Executive Officer
2019
2018
2017
$1,199,981
$999,993
$1,516,125
$216,317
$170,867
$24,880
$1,416,298
$1,170,830
$1,541,005
Stephen Alpart,
Vice President and Chief Investment
   Officer
2019
2018
2017
$749,981
$599,999
$390,000
$109,363
$67,680
$6,400
$859,344
$667,679
$396,400
Steven Plust
Vice President and Chief Operating
   Officer
2019
2018
2017
$749,981
$599,999
$390,000
$109,363
$67,680
$6,400
$859,344
$667,679
$396,400
Marcin Urbaszek,
Vice President, Chief Financial
   Officer and Treasurer
2019
2018
2017
$249,987
$199,988
$263,250
$42,193
$31,488
$4,320
$292,180
$231,476
$267,570
Rebecca B. Sandberg,
Vice President and Secretary
2019
2018
2017
$69,999
$49,997
$195,000
$16,604
$16,529
$3,200
$86,603
$66,526
$198,200
(1)
See also “Grants of Plan-Based Awards.” The shares of restricted stock were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan and vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as the Named Executive Officer complies with the terms and conditions of his or her restricted stock agreement. The values in this column represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of such grant.
(2)The values in this column represent dividends paid on unvested shares of restricted common stock.
(3)
Because we do not currently pay cash compensation to our Named Executive Officers, any such compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers by our Manager is not included in this Summary Compensation Table. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Overview of Compensation Program and Philosophy” for further discussion of cash compensation paid by our Manager.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2019
The following table provides information regarding restricted stock awards granted to our Named Executive Officers under our Equity Incentive Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
Name Grant Date 
All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares
of Stock(1)
 
Grant Date Fair Value
of Stock Awards(2)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor 01/28/2019 62,143 $1,199,981
Stephen Alpart 01/28/2019 38,839 $749,981
Steven Plust 01/28/2019 38,839 $749,981
Marcin Urbaszek 01/28/2019 12,946 $249,987
Rebecca B. Sandberg 01/28/2019 3,625 $69,999
(1)
See also “Summary Compensation Table.” The shares of restricted stock were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan and vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as the Named Executive Officer complies with the terms and conditions of his or her restricted stock award agreement.
(2)The values in this column represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of such grant.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning unvested restricted stock awards for each of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2019.
Stock Awards
NameGrant Date
Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested(1)
Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested(2)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor
01/28/2019
01/29/2018
06/22/2017
62,143
38,469
25.917
$1,142,188
$707,060
$476,354
Stephen Alpart
01/28/2019
01/29/2018
06/22/2017
38,839
23,082
6,667
$713,861
$424,247
$122,539
Steven Plust
01/28/2019
01/29/2018
06/22/2017
38,839
23,082
6,667
$713,861
$424,247
$122,539
Marcin Urbaszek
01/28/2019
01/29/2018
06/22/2017
12,946
7,694
4,500
$237,947
$141,416
$82,710
Rebecca B. Sandberg
01/28/2019
01/29/2018
06/22/2017
3,625
1,924
3,334
$66,627
$35,363
$61,279
(1)The shares of restricted stock were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan and vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as the Named Executive Officer complies with the terms and conditions of his or her restricted stock award agreement.
(2)The values in this column are based on the $18.38 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2019.
Stock Vested in 2019
The following table sets forth information concerning the shares of restricted stock held by our Named Executive Officers that vested during the year ended December 31, 2019.2022, we recorded a $0.5 million recovery of amounts previously written off in a prior period on
2023 PROXY STATEMENT / A-1

Appendix – Definitions and GAAP Reconciliation
  Stock Awards
Name  Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting 
Value Realized on Vesting(1)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor  45,151 $860,981
Stephen Alpart  18,207 $348,777
Steven Plust  18,207 $348,777
Marcin Urbaszek  8,346 $159,271
Rebecca B. Sandberg  4,294 $81,517
(1)The values in this column are based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on such date or, to the extent the NYSE was closed on such date, the closing market price of our common stock on the most recent NYSE trading date prior to the vesting date.



Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not currently have a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides for deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified for the Named Executive Officers.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
We do not currently have any agreements with our Named Executive Officers to pay cash compensation upon termination or change of control. However, our Equity Incentive Plan and the restricted stock award agreements with our Named Executive Officers provide for accelerated vesting of any unvested restricted stock awards in the event of termination of service without cause or due to death, disability or retirement and, potentially, in connection with a change in control of our Company. The following table sets forth estimates of the potential benefits to our Named Executive Officers in connection with such circumstances, assuming such event occurred on December 31, 2019 and assuming our Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to accelerate vesting of unvested restricted stock awards upon a change in control. The actual payments due upon the occurrence of certain events could materially differ from the estimates provided in the table if such events occur on a different date.
Name Number of Shares of Vesting Restricted Stock 
Value of Vesting
Restricted Stock(1)
John (“Jack”) A. Taylor 126,529 $2,325,603
Stephen Alpart 108,588 $1,995,847
Steven Plust 108,588 $1,995,847
Marcin Urbaszek 25,140 $462,073
Rebecca B. Sandberg 8,883 $163,270
(1)Comprised of all outstanding shares of restricted stock held by such Named Executive Officer that had not vested as of December 31, 2019. The values in this column are based on the $18.38 closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2019.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
In August 2015, the SEC issued final rules implementing the provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that require U.S. publicly-traded companies to disclose the ratio of their Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to that of their median employee. Disclosure pursuant to such rules is not included herein because our Company does not currently have any employees.


PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The SEC adopted rules pursuant to Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act that require public companies to provide stockholders with periodic advisory (non-binding) votes on executive compensation, also referred to as “say-on-pay” proposals.
As more fully described under the sections of this proxy statement entitled “Executive Officers” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” we are currently externally managed by our Manager pursuant a Management Agreement and, consequently, we do not currently have any employees and have not paid any cash compensation directly to any of our Named Executive Officers. Each Named Executive Officer’s compensation is currently comprised of cash compensation paid to them directly by our Manager and equity awards granted by our Company pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan. The amount of cash compensation paid to each Named Executive Officer is currently determined by, and is the responsibility of, our Manager and the amount of the equity awards granted to each Named Executive Officer is the responsibility of, and determined by, our Compensation Committee. For more information regarding our executive compensation, please see “Executive Officers” above.
At the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders with an opportunity to cast an advisory vote regarding our executive compensation. At that meeting, the stockholders approved the proposal, with more than 98% of the votes cast voting in favor of the proposal.
Similar to last year, at the Annual Meeting, we are asking you to vote “FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLVED: That the stockholders of the Company approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related narrative discussions in the proxy statement.”
Because this say-on-pay vote is advisory in nature, it is not binding on us, our Board, our Compensation Committee or our Manager. Our Board has determined that our Company will hold an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis. We currently expect to conduct the next advisory vote on executive compensation at our next annual meeting of stockholders in June 2021.
VOTING RECOMMENDATION
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY VOTE RELATED TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.


PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, our Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by our Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any timediscounted payoff. Additionally, during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
We retained Ernst & Young LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. We also retained Ernst & Young LLP, as well as other accounting and consulting firms, to provide various other services2022, we recorded $(25.6) million in 2019.
The table below presents the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
Year Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018
Audit fees(1)
$765,000 $859,552
Audit-related fees -  -
Tax fees(2)
 171,242  197,476
All other fees -  -
Total$936,242 $1,057,028
(1)Audit fees pertain to the audit of our annual Consolidated Financial Statements, including review of the interim financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters to underwriters in connection with our registration statements and common stock offerings, attest services, consents to the incorporation of the Ernst & Young LLP audit report in publicly filed documents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Tax fees pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including REIT compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including preparation of tax returns and claims for refund and tax-payment planning services. Tax planning and advice also includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, and tax advice related to specific transactions.
Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy
The services performed by Ernst & Young LLP in 2019 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. This policy requires that all engagement fees and the terms and scope of all audit and non-audit services be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in advance of their formal initiation.
VOTING RECOMMENDATION
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2020.


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Our Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee presently composed of independent directors Stephen G. Kasnet, W. Reid Sanders and Hope B. Woodhouse. Mr. Kasnet serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Each of the directors on our Audit Committee is an independent director under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Kasnet and Ms. Woodhouse satisfies the definition of financial sophistication and is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. 
Our Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight with respect to the preparation, review and audit of our financial statements and the qualifications, independence and performance of our internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in its charterwrite-offs, which is available on our website at www.gpmtreit.com. It is not the duty of our Audit Committee to prepare our financial statements or to plan or conduct audits. Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and for developing, maintaining and evaluating our internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our consolidated financial statements and for expressing an opinion as to whether they fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, as appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee reviews our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. In performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, or EY, with respect to our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2019 and related matters. Management advised the Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and EY. EY presented to and reviewed with the Audit Committee the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, and the SEC. EY also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EY’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning its independence, and, in connection therewith, the Audit Committee discussed with EY their views as to its independence. The Audit Committee also reviewed, among other things, the audit and non-audit services performed by, and the amount of fees paid for such services to, EY. The Audit Committee meetings regularly include executive sessions with EY without the presence of our management.
In undertaking its oversight function, the Audit Committee relied, without independent verification, on management’s representation that the financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on EY’s representationwe included in their report on our financial statements. The Audit Committee isDistributable Earnings because we did not however, professionally engaged incollect all amounts due at the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance or professional opinion astime the sufficiency of the external or internal audits or whether the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, our Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements forloans were resolved. During the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, we recorded a $(18.8) million loss on early extinguishment of debt, which has been excluded from Distributable Earnings consistent with certain one-time expenses pursuant to our existing policy for reporting Distributable Earnings as a helpful indicator in assessing the overall run-rate operating performance of our business.
Distributable Earnings does not represent net income (loss) or cash flow from operating activities and should not be includedconsidered as an alternative to GAAP net income (loss), or an indication of our GAAP cash flows from operations, a measure of our liquidity, or an indication of funds available for our cash needs. In addition, our methodology for calculating Distributable Earnings may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures, and, accordingly, our reported Distributable Earnings may not be comparable to the Distributable Earnings reported by other companies.
RECONCILIATION TO RELATED GAAP MEASURE
($ in millions, except per share data)2022
GAAP Net (Loss)$(55.3)
Adjustments:
Provision for Credit Losses$69.3
Write-offs$(25.6)
Recovery of amounts previously written off$0.5
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt$18.8
Non-Cash Equity Compensation$7.0
Distributable Earnings$14.7
Basic Wtd. Avg. Common Shares53,011,806
Distributable Earnings Per Basic Share$0.28
Stabilized LTV
Definition: The fully funded loan amount (plus any financing that is pari passu with or senior to such loan), including all contractually provided for future fundings, divided by the as stabilized value (as determined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for filingconformance with the SEC. Our Audit Committee also has recommendedUniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) set forth in the appointmentoriginal appraisal. As stabilized value may be based on certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting, payment of EY to servetenant improvement or leasing commissions allowances or free or abated rent periods, or increased tenant occupancies.
Weighted Average Yield
Definition: Provided for illustrative purposes only. Calculations of all-in yield at origination are based on a number of assumptions (some or all of which may not occur) and are expressed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020. 
monthly equivalent yields that include net origination fees and exit fees and exclude future fundings and any potential or completed loan amendments or modifications. Calculations of all-in weighted average yield at origination exclude fixed-rate loans.
A-2 / gpmtreit.com/investors
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board:
Stephen G. Kasnet (Chair)
W. Reid Sanders
Hope B. Woodhouse

Use of Audit Committee Report
In accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable law or regulation, the information contained in the foregoing Report of the Audit Committee is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act.


OTHER MATTERS
Meeting Matters
Our Board does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting except items incident to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all matters properly brought before the meeting by our Board or others, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in their discretion to the extent permitted by law. 
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2021 Annual Meeting 
Our 2021 annual meeting is expected to be held on or about June 1, 2021. If a stockholder intends to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the stockholder proposal must be received by the Secretary of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036, on or before December 18, 2020. If such proposal is in compliance with all of the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the proposal will be included in our proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting. We suggest such proposals be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require us to include any stockholder proposal that does not meet all the requirements for such inclusion established by the SEC in effect at that time. 
Stockholders may (outside of Rule 14a-8(e)) nominate candidates for election to the Board or propose business for consideration at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders under Maryland law and our Bylaws. Our Bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our Board and the proposal of other business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting; (ii) by or at the direction of our Board or (iii) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the notice required by our Bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in our Bylaws. Under our Bylaws, notice of such a nomination or proposal of other business must generally be provided to the Secretary not earlier than the 150th day nor later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. In addition, any such nomination or proposal must include the information required by our Bylaws. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by December 18, 2020, but in no event earlier than November 18, 2020.
Annual Report
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder, without charge, upon written request to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036. You also may obtain our Annual Report on Form 10-K on the Internet at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or on our website at www.gmptreit.com. Our 2019 Annual Report, which contains information about our business, but is not part of our disclosure deemed to be filed with the SEC, is also available on our website at www.gpmtreit.com.



Detach Here

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC.
2020
2023
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

RESERVATION REQUEST FORM
If you wish to attend the webcast of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.’s 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) at the offices of StinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (located at 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 2600, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402)One Manhattan West, New York, New York 10001), you must complete the following information and return the form to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., Attention: Michael J. Karber, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 3 Bryant Park, Suite 2400A, New York, New York 10036. Please note that no members of management or theour Board will be in attendance at StinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP’s offices and you will not have the ability to vote your shares from that location. This form must be received by Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. no later than June 1, 2020.May 30, 2023.
Your name and address:    
   
Your name and address:
Number of shares of Granite Point common stock you hold:
   
   

   
   
Number of shares of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. common stock you hold:
Please note that if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee(i.e. (i.e., in street name), you may be able to authorize your proxy by telephone or the Internet, as well as by mail. You should follow the instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee to vote these shares. Also, if you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from your bank, broker or nominee to be able to vote via the Annual Meeting webcast. If the shares listed above are not registered in your name, identify the name of the registered stockholder belowand include evidence that you beneficially own the shares.
Record stockholder:
  (name of your bank, broker or other nominee)
Record stockholder:
(name of your bank, broker, or other nominee)
THIS IS NOT A PROXY CARD
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




proxycardpage1.jpg



[MISSING IMAGE: cv_obc-pn.jpg]

proxycardpage2.jpg


[MISSING IMAGE: px_proxy01pg01-bw.jpg]
GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. 3 BRYANT PARK, SUITE 2400ANEW YORK, NY 10036 SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTEVOTE BY INTERNETBefore The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode aboveUse the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time May 31, 2023. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPMT2023You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time May 31, 2023. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.VOTE BY MAILMark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:D97655-P88538KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDSTHIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYGRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:1.Election of Directors Nominees: 1a. Tanuja M. Dehne 1b. Stephen G. Kasnet 1c. Sheila K. McGrath 1d. W. Reid Sanders 1e. John A. Taylor 1f. Hope B. Woodhouse The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.2.To approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers. For Against Abstain! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! 3.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. NOTE: To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. For Against Abstain! ! ! Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date

[MISSING IMAGE: px_proxy01pg02-bw.jpg]
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Annual Report and Notice and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com.D97656-P88538GRANITE POINT MORTGAGE TRUST INC.Annual Meeting of StockholdersJune 1, 2023 10:00 AM Eastern TimeThis proxy is solicited by the Board of DirectorsThe undersigned hereby authorizes and appoints John A. Taylor and Michael J. Karber, and each of them, as proxy holders, with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually on Thursday, June 1, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof, and to cast on behalf of the undersigned all votes that the undersigned is entitled to cast at such meeting and to otherwise represent the undersigned at the meeting with all powers possessed by the undersigned if personally present at the meeting.When properly executed, this proxy will be voted on the proposals set forth herein as directed by the stockholder, but if no direction is made in the space provided, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of all nominees for director, FOR the advisory vote on executive compensation, FOR ratification of the independent auditor appointment, and according to the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. This proxy is revocable.The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies relating to the shares covered hereby and acknowledges receipt of the Notice and Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Continued and to be signed on reverse side

0001703644 5 2022-01-01 2022-12-31